Cited by 58Pleural and Pulmonary DiseasesPneumothorax, Barotrauma, EmphysemaTrauma Management and Diagnosis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of size classification of primary spontaneous pneumothorax by three international guidelines: A case for international consensus?

Open access
Kelly, Anne-Maree, Druda, Dino·2008·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare classification of pneumothoraces into size groups for treatment using the British Thoracic Society [BTS], American College of Chest Physicians [ACCP] and Belgian Society of Pulmonology [BSP] guidelines and the range of pneumothorax sizes in each group calculated using the volumetrically-derived Collins' method.Method This was a retrospective cohort study. Participants were patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax [PSP] attending emergency departments of two teaching hospitals between 1996 and 2005. Participants were identified from a pre-existing database. Data collected included demographics, side of PSP and interpleural distances for size classification based on BTS, ACCP, BSP and Collins' method requirements measured on inspiratory X-rays. The outcome of interest was comparison of classification into size groups according to each guideline. Analysis was by descriptive statistics, overall agreement and Kappa analysis for agreement between guideline pairs.Results Forty-nine episodes [44 patients] were studied. Median age was 22 years; 66% of patients were male. Median PSP size [Collins' method; inspiratory films] was 24%; range 5-100%. Based on inspiratory films, the BTS guideline classified 10% of PSP as large compared with 47% by the BSP guideline and 49% by the ACCP guideline. The three guidelines agreed in their classification in only 47% of cases.Conclusion Size classification of PSP based on available treatment guideline definitions shows poor agreement. This goes some way to explain management variation between regions and limits comparability of reported outcomes. There is a strong case for international agreement in size classification/estimation in order to facilitate high-quality studies into optimal management approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.07.026

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kelly, A.-M., & Druda, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Western Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Anne-Maree
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
102
Issue
12
Pages
1830-1832
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150245847
Cited by
58
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Trauma Management and Diagnosis
Keywords
primary spontaneous pneumothorax, treatment guidelines, guideline agreement, BTS guidelines, international consensus
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, International Cooperation, Male, Pneumothorax, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review