The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of size classification of primary spontaneous pneumothorax by three international guidelines: A case for international consensus?
Open accessAbstract
Objective The aim of this study was to compare classification of pneumothoraces into size groups for treatment using the British Thoracic Society [BTS], American College of Chest Physicians [ACCP] and Belgian Society of Pulmonology [BSP] guidelines and the range of pneumothorax sizes in each group calculated using the volumetrically-derived Collins' method.Method This was a retrospective cohort study. Participants were patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax [PSP] attending emergency departments of two teaching hospitals between 1996 and 2005. Participants were identified from a pre-existing database. Data collected included demographics, side of PSP and interpleural distances for size classification based on BTS, ACCP, BSP and Collins' method requirements measured on inspiratory X-rays. The outcome of interest was comparison of classification into size groups according to each guideline. Analysis was by descriptive statistics, overall agreement and Kappa analysis for agreement between guideline pairs.Results Forty-nine episodes [44 patients] were studied. Median age was 22 years; 66% of patients were male. Median PSP size [Collins' method; inspiratory films] was 24%; range 5-100%. Based on inspiratory films, the BTS guideline classified 10% of PSP as large compared with 47% by the BSP guideline and 49% by the ACCP guideline. The three guidelines agreed in their classification in only 47% of cases.Conclusion Size classification of PSP based on available treatment guideline definitions shows poor agreement. This goes some way to explain management variation between regions and limits comparability of reported outcomes. There is a strong case for international agreement in size classification/estimation in order to facilitate high-quality studies into optimal management approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No consensus exists on the definition of primary spontaneous pneumothorax severity, with CHEST and BTS using different arbitrary measurements of the presentation chest radiograph.
“Remarkably, no consensus regarding the definition of PSP severity exists, with CHEST and the BTS each using different arbitrary measurements of the presentation chest radiograph.”
From Noninterventional statistical comparison of BTS and CHEST guidelines for size and severity in primary pneumothorax (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
When the CHEST and BTS measurements were compared directly, they showed poor correlation.
“When these measurements were compared directly to one another, they showed poor correlation [4].”
From Noninterventional statistical comparison of BTS and CHEST guidelines for size and severity in primary pneumothorax (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Management of Spontaneous Pneumothorax
Baumann, M. H., Strange, C., Heffner, J. E., Light, R. W., Kirby, T. J., Klein, J. S., Luketich, J. D., Panacek, E. A., & Sahn, S. A. (2001) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1378/chest.119.2.590 · Cited by 1,259
BTS guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax
Henry, M. T., Arnold, T., & Harvey, J. (2003) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.58.suppl_2.ii39 · Cited by 629
Collins, C. D., Lopez, A., Ag, M., et al. (1995) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.165.5.7572489 · Cited by 204
Belgian Society of Pneumology. Guidelines on the management of spontaneous pneumothorax
Leyn, P. D., Lismonde, M., Ninane, V., Noppen, M. M. P., Slabbynck, H., MEERHAEGHE, A. V., Schil, P. E. V., & Vermassen, F. E. G. (2005) · Acta chirurgica Belgica · doi:10.1080/00015458.2005.11679714 · Cited by 103
How accurate is the Light index for estimating pneumothorax size?
Hoi, K., Turchin, B., & Kelly, A. (2007) · Australasian Radiology · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01705.x · Cited by 31
Self-citationKelly, A., Clooney, M., & Spontaneous Pneumothorax Australia Study Group (2008) · Internal Medicine Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01540.x · Cited by 25
Self-citationReview of management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: Is the best evidence clearer 15 years on?
Kelly, A. (2007) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00997.x · Cited by 24
Self-citationPrimary spontaneous pneumothorax: why all
Mackenzie, S. J., & Gray, A. J. (2007) · The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh · doi:10.1177/1478271520073704022 · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010
MacDuff, A., Arnold, A., Harvey, J., & on behalf of the BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group (2010) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2010.136986 · Cited by 1,481
Nikolić, M. Z., Lok, L. S. C., Mattishent, K., Barth, S., Yung, B., Cummings, N. M., Wade, D., Vali, Y., Chong, K., Wilkinson, A., et al. (2015) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00118614 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly, A.-M., & Druda, D.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Western Health (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kelly, Anne-Maree
- ORCID
- Kelly, Anne-Maree
- Venue
- Respiratory Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1830-1832
- ISSN
- 0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150245847
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Trauma Management and Diagnosis
- Keywords
- primary spontaneous pneumothorax, treatment guidelines, guideline agreement, BTS guidelines, international consensus
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, International Cooperation, Male, Pneumothorax, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review