Cited by 222Soft Robotics and ApplicationsRobot Manipulation and LearningAdvanced Materials and Mechanics

A dual-mode soft gripper for food packaging

Wang, Zhongkui, Or, Keung, Hirai, Shinichi·2020·Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103427

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Or, K., & Hirai, S.
Affiliations
Ritsumeikan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhongkui
Venue
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
125
Pages
103427
ISSN
0921-8890 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999228329
Cited by
222
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
Keywords
soft gripper, suction, food packaging, robot end-effector, soft fingers, lift force, food handling, soft robotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review