The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground reference data
Open accessAbstract
The ground data used as a reference in the validation of land cover change products are often not an ideal gold standard but degraded by error. The effects of ground reference data error on the accuracy of land cover change detection and the accuracy of estimates of the extent of change was evaluated. Twelve data sets were simulated to allow the exploration of the impacts of a spectrum of ground data imperfections on the estimation of the producer’s and user’s accuracy of change as well as of change extent. Simulated data were used since this ensured that the actual properties of the data were known and to exclude effects due to other sources of ground reference data error; although the impacts of simulated reference data on two real confusion matrices is also illustrated. The imperfections evaluated ranged from the inclusion of small amounts of known error into the ground reference data through to the extreme situation in which ground data were absent. The results show that even small amounts of error in the ground reference data can introduce large error into studies of land cover change by remote sensing and reinforce the desire to avoid the expression ground truth as this might imply that the data are a gold standard reference. The effect of reference data imperfections was dependent on the degree of association between the errors in the cross tabulated data sets. For example, in the scenarios investigated, a 10% error in the reference data set introduced an under-estimation of the producer’s accuracy of 18.5% if the errors were independent but an over-estimation of the producer’s accuracy of 12.3% if the errors were correlated. The magnitude of the mis-estimation of the producer’s accuracy was also a function of the amount of change and greatest at low levels of change. The amount of land cover change estimated also varied greatly as a function of ground reference data error. Some possible methods to reduce or even remove the impacts of ground reference data error were illustrated. These ranged from simple algebraic means to estimate the actual values of accuracy and change extent if the imperfections were known through to a latent class analysis that allowed the assessment of classification accuracy and estimation of change extent without the use of ground reference data if the underlying model is defined appropriately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
FIELDING, A. H., & BELL, J. F. (1997) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892997000088 · Cited by 6,956
The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability
Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F., & Reenberg, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704119104 · Cited by 2,216
Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World's Humid Tropical Forests
Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H.-J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T., & Malingreau, J.-P. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070656 · Cited by 1,993 · cited 1×
“For example, Skole and Tucker (1993) highlighted substantial, ~50%, over-estimation of deforestation arising through the use of coarse spatial resolution data sets and Achard et al. (2002) suggest that some estimates of deforestation rates in the humid tropics may have been exaggerated by ~23%.”
BackgroundTropical Deforestation and Habitat Fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite Data from 1978 to 1988
Skole, D., & Tucker, C. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.260.5116.1905 · Cited by 1,590
The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences
Kaplan, D. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412986311 · Cited by 1,454
ESTIMATING PREVALENCE FROM THE RESULTS OF A SCREENING TEST
ROGAN, W. J., & GLADEN, B. (1978) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112510 · Cited by 1,001
Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards
Valenstein, P. N. (1990) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/93.2.252 · Cited by 220 · cited 5×
“…the assumption of conditional independence that underlies the standard latent class model means that its only parameters are the latent class probabilities and the conditional probabilities, which define the sensitivity and specificity of the classifications (Yang and Becker, 1997; Rindskopf,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMCALPINE, C. A., SYKTUS, J., RYAN, J. G., DEO, R. C., MCKEON, G. M., MCGOWAN, H. A., & PHINN, S. R. (2009) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01939.x · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Foody, G. M.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2271-2285
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111743232
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 37.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground reference data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rse.2010.05.003
- The paper
- Foody, G. M. (2010). Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground reference data. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.05.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.