A reprocessing for climate of sea surface temperature from the along-track scanning radiometers: Basis in radiative transfer
Abstract
We present new radiative transfer simulations to support determination of sea surface temperature (SST) from Along Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR) imagery. The simulations are to be used within the ATSR Reprocessing for Climate project. The simulations are based on the “Reference Forward Model” line-by-line model linked with a sea surface emissivity model that accounts for wind speed and temperature, and with a discrete ordinates scattering model (DISORT). Input to the forward model is a revised atmospheric profile dataset, based on full resolution ERA-40, with a wider range of high-latitude profiles to address known retrieval biases in those regions. Analysis of the radiative impacts of atmospheric trace gases shows that geographical and temporal variation of N₂O, CH₄, HNO₃, and CFC-11 and CFC-12 have effects of order 0.05, 0.2, 0.1K on the 3.7, 11, 12μm channels respectively. In addition several trace gases, neglected in previous studies, are included using fixed profiles contributing ~0.04K to top-of-atmosphere BTs. Comparison against observations for ATSR2 and AATSR indicates that forward model biases have been reduced from 0.2 to 0.5K for previous simulations to ~0.1K.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TIR radiances were inverted to SST independently of in situ measurements, based on physical modelling not empirical tuning.
“inversion of TIR radiances to SST independently of in situ measurements (i.e., based on physical modelling not empirical tuning14)”
From Satellite-based time-series of sea-surface temperature since 1981 for climate applications (2019) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Embury, O., Merchant, C. J., & Filipiak, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Merchant, Christopher J.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 116
- Pages
- 32-46
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162660560
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Remote Sensing of Environment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Energy and Climate Change
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Natural Environment Research Council (earth010002, NE/D001129/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Keywords
- sea surface temperature, ATSR, radiative transfer modeling, sea surface emissivity, DISORT, line-by-line model, atmospheric trace gases, retrieval bias, ERA-40
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review