Cited by 13Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesSoil Moisture and Remote SensingOcean Waves and Remote Sensing

Suitability of satellite sea surface salinity data for use in assessing and correcting ocean forecasts.

Martin, Matthew J.·2016·Remote Sensing of Environment

Abstract

Near-surface salinity data from the Forecasting Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM) system are used to understand various characteristics of satellite sea surface salinity (SSS) data from SMOS. The errors in the model fields are first estimated by comparing them to near-surface Argo salinity measurements, with RMS errors of less than 0.2pss over most of the global oceans, except for regions of high variability in SSS such as boundary current regions and areas of large precipitation or river run-off. Regional biases are generally less than 0.05pss but some regions such as the Antarctic Circumpolar Current and the region to the north of the Gulf Stream extension have larger biases. Various different processing versions of the SMOS data are assessed, including different temporal and spatial averaging, and the daily 1° resolution SMOS differences to FOAM are approximately 3–10 times larger than Argo-FOAM differences. The spatial information in the SMOS data is also assessed by comparing spatial gradients in the satellite SSS data with those calculated from other datasets including satellite sea surface temperature (SST) and satellite altimeter sea surface height (SSH) data, as well as with the model's gradients. The SMOS data contain information about the underlying ocean dynamics in the summer months, in agreement with the SSH data, which are not present in the satellite SST data or in the model's SSS fields. This demonstrates that the data contains useful information which could be…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been some successful attempts to assimilate microwave data from SMOS, Aquarius, and SMAP satellites to correct SSS.

    “There have been some successful attempts to assimilate microwave data from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), Aquarius, and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellites to correct SSS (Martin, 2016).”

    From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Martin, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The tropical atlantic observing system

    Foltz, G. R., Brandt, P., Richter, I., Rodríguez-Fonseca, B., Hernandez, F., Dengler, M., Rodrigues, R. R., Schmidt, J. O., Yu, L., Lefevre, N., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00206 · Cited by 150 · see citing works

    “Thermosalinographs (TSGs), instruments mounted close to the water intake of ships to continuously measure SSS and SST, record measurements along two SOOP transects.”
    BackgroundInfluential

Authors
Martin, M. J.
Affiliations
Met Office (GB)
Corresponding author
Martin, Matthew J.
Venue
Remote Sensing of Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
180
Pages
305-319
ISSN
0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2280995699
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Remote Sensing of Environment (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer
  • Met Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Keywords
sea surface salinity, SMOS, ocean forecasting, data assimilation, Argo floats, model bias, salinity gradient, sea surface height, sea surface temperature, boundary currents, Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Gulf Stream, satellite data quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review