Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 534

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimating 1-km-resolution PM2.5 concentrations across China using the space-time random forest approach

Open access
Wei, Jing, Huang, Wei, Li, Zhanqing, Xue, Wenhao, Peng, Yiran, Sun, Lin, Cribb, Maureen·2019·Remote Sensing of Environment

Abstract

Abstract Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is closely related to the atmospheric environment and human life. Satellite-based aerosol optical depth (AOD) products have been widely applied in estimating daily PM2.5 concentrations over large areas using statistical regression models. However, they are often given at coarse spatial resolutions which limit their applications in small or medium scales. This study aims to produce PM2.5 concentrations at a high spatial resolution (1 km) across China based on the newly released Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Collection 6 Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) AOD product using a newly developed space-time random forest (STRF) model. Daily PM2.5 concentrations for 2016 were estimated from in-situ surface PM2.5 measurements, and meteorological and ancillary variables. The 10-fold cross-validation (CV) approach and three popular models, including the multiple linear regression model, the geographically weighted regression model, and the two-stage model, are employed for validation and cross-comparison. A sample-based CV of the STRF model shows a high and stable accuracy with a coefficient of determination equal to 0.85, a root-mean-square error of 15.57 μg m−3, and a mean prediction error of 9.77 μg m−3. This finding suggests that the STRF model can predict PM2.5 daily, monthly, and annual concentrations at an unprecedented spatial resolution and accuracy across China. It also appears to have outperformed the above popular models and the previous related studies. In general, the STRF model is robust and can accurately estimate PM2.5 concentrations by taking advantage of the ensemble regression approach, the synergy of space-time information, and the high-resolution, high-quality, and wide-spatial-coverage of the MAIAC AOD product. It may thus also be useful for applications in related air pollution studies, especially those focused on urban areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111221

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 534

Metadata

Authors
Wei, J., Huang, W., Li, Z., Xue, W., Peng, Y., Sun, L., & Cribb, M.
Venue
Remote Sensing of Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
231
Pages
111221
ISSN
0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953978338
Cited by
534
References
3
FWCI
30.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating 1-km-resolution PM2.5 concentrations across China using the space-time random forest approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111221
The paper
Wei, J., Huang, W., Li, Z., Xue, W., Peng, Y., Sun, L., & Cribb, M. (2019). Estimating 1-km-resolution PM2.5 concentrations across China using the space-time random forest approach. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111221

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.