The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soybean yield prediction from UAV using multimodal data fusion and deep learning
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Preharvest crop yield prediction is critical for grain policy making and food security. Early estimation of yield at field or plot scale also contributes to high-throughput plant phenotyping and precision agriculture. New developments in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platforms and sensor technology facilitate cost-effective data collection through simultaneous multi-sensor/multimodal data collection at very high spatial and spectral resolutions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the power of UAV-based multimodal data fusion using RGB, multispectral and thermal sensors to estimate soybean (Glycine max) grain yield within the framework of Deep Neural Network (DNN). RGB, multispectral, and thermal images were collected using a low-cost multi-sensory UAV from a test site in Columbia, Missouri, USA. Multimodal information, such as canopy spectral, structure, thermal and texture features, was extracted and combined to predict crop grain yield using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), input-level feature fusion based DNN (DNN-F1) and intermediate-level feature fusion based DNN (DNN-F2). The results can be summarized in three messages: (1) multimodal data fusion improves the yield prediction accuracy and is more adaptable to spatial variations; (2) DNN-based models improve yield prediction model accuracy: the highest accuracy was obtained by DNN-F2 with an R2 of 0.720 and a relative root mean square error (RMSE%) of 15.9%; (3) DNN-based models were less prone to saturation effects, and exhibited more adaptive performance in predicting grain yields across the Dwight, Pana and AG3432 soybean genotypes in our study. Furthermore, DNN-based models demonstrated consistent performance over space with less spatial dependency and variations. This study indicates that multimodal data fusion using low-cost UAV within a DNN framework can provide a relatively accurate and robust estimation of crop yield, and deliver valuable insight for high-throughput phenotyping and crop field management with high spatial precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Large-Scale Video Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks
Karpathy, A., Toderici, G., Shetty, S., Leung, T., Sukthankar, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.223 · Cited by 6,354
Deep multimodal learning: a survey on recent advances and trends
Ramachandram, D., & Taylor, G. W. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2738401 · Cited by 1,139
Climate change impacts on crop yield, crop water productivity and food security—A review
Kang, Y., Khan, S., & Ma, X. (2009) · Progress in Natural Science · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2009.08.001 · Cited by 1,069
Cai, Y., Guan, K., Peng, J., Wang, S., Seifert, C., Wardlow, B., & Li, Z. (2018) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.045 · Cited by 540
Fusing audio, visual and textual clues for sentiment analysis from multimodal content
Poria, S., Cambria, E., Howard, N., Huang, G.-B., & Hussain, A. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.01.095 · Cited by 534
Self-supervised model adaptation for multimodal semantic segmentation
Valada, A., Mohan, R., & Burgard, W. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01188-y · Cited by 293
Cited by
Danilevicz, M. F., Bayer, P. E., Boussaid, F., Bennamoun, M., & Edwards, D. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13193976 · Cited by 75
Togninalli, M., Wang, X., Kucera, T., Shrestha, S., Juliana, P., Mondal, S., Pinto, F., Govindan, V., Crespo-Herrera, L., Huerta-Espino, J., et al. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad336 · Cited by 49
“More recently, deep learning techniques leveraged the potential of high-dimensional image data both across data sources (Herrero-Huerta et al. 2020, Maimaitijiang et al. 2020) and time (Khaki et al. 2019, Nevavuori et al. 2020).”
Multimodal Deep Learning for Crop Yield Prediction
Jácome-Galarza, L.-R. (2022) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18347-8_9 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Maimaitijiang, M., Sagan, V., Sidike, P., Hartling, S., Esposito, F., & Fritschi, F. B.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 237
- Pages
- 111599
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996041315
- Cited by
- 971
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 43.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soybean yield prediction from UAV using multimodal data fusion and deep learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111599
- The paper
- Maimaitijiang, M., Sagan, V., Sidike, P., Hartling, S., Esposito, F., & Fritschi, F. B. (2020). Soybean yield prediction from UAV using multimodal data fusion and deep learning. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.