Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DeepCropMapping: A multi-temporal deep learning approach with improved spatial generalizability for dynamic corn and soybean mapping

Xu, Jinfan, Zhu, Yue, Zhong, Renhai, Lin, Zhixian, Xu, Jialu, Jiang, Hao, Huang, Jingfeng, Li, Haifeng, Lin, Tao·2020·Remote Sensing of Environment

Abstract

Abstract Accurate crop mapping provides important and timely information for decision support on the estimation of crop production at large scale. Most existing crop-specific cover products based on remote sensing data and machine learning algorithms cannot serve large agriculture production areas as a result of poor model transfer capabilities. Developing a generalizable crop classification model for spatial transfer across regions is greatly needed. A deep learning approach, named DeepCropMapping (DCM), has been developed based on long short-term memory structure with attention mechanisms through integrating multi-temporal and multi-spectral remote sensing data for large-scale dynamic corn and soybean mapping. Full cross validation of classification experiments were conducted in six sites each covering 2,890,000 pixels at 30 m resolution in the U.S. corn belt from Year 2015 to 2018. Landsat Analysis Ready Data (ARD) and Cropland Data Layer (CDL) were adopted as the input satellite observations and ground reference, respectively. Transformer, Random Forest (RF), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) models were built for comparison. The DCM model produced a mean kappa score of 85.8% in base sites and a mean average kappa score of 82.0% in transfer sites at the end of the growing season. It yielded a comparable performance to Transformer and better than RF and MLP at the local test. The DCM model significantly outperformed other three models with a 95% confidence interval in the spatial transfer analysis. The results demonstrated the capability of learning generalizable features by the DCM model from ARD time series. The computational complexity analysis suggested that the DCM model required a shorter training time than Transformer but longer than MLP and RF. The results of the in-season classification experiment indicated the DCM model captured critical information from key growth phases and achieved higher accuracy than other models after the beginning of July. By monitoring the classification confidence in each time step, the results showed that the increased length of seasonal remote sensing time series would reduce the classification uncertainty in all sites. This study provided a viable option toward large-scale dynamic crop mapping through the integration of deep learning and remote sensing time series.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111946

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Xu, J., Zhu, Y., Zhong, R., Lin, Z., Xu, J., Jiang, H., Huang, J., Li, H., & Lin, T.
Venue
Remote Sensing of Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
247
Pages
111946
ISSN
0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037002701
Cited by
264
References
62
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeepCropMapping: A multi-temporal deep learning approach with improved spatial generalizability for dynamic corn and soybean mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111946
The paper
Xu, J., Zhu, Y., Zhong, R., Lin, Z., Xu, J., Jiang, H., Huang, J., Li, H., & Lin, T. (2020). DeepCropMapping: A multi-temporal deep learning approach with improved spatial generalizability for dynamic corn and soybean mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111946

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.