Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of demand-side management policy in the UK

Warren, Peter·2014·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.009

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. Bunn DW, Seigal JP, Television peaks in electricity demand, Energy Economics; January 1983. · doi:10.1016/0140-9883(83)90006-3
  2. Barrett, 2006, A renewable electricity system for the UK – a response to the 2006 energy review
  3. Wittneben, 2012, The impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on European energy policy, Environmental Science & Policy, 15, 1, 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.002 · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.002
  4. Prüggler, 2011, Storage and Demand Side Management as power generator's strategic instruments to influence demand and prices, Energy, 36, 6308, 10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.048 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.048
  5. Eissa, 2011, Demand side management program evaluation based on industrial and commercial field data, Energy Policy, 39, 5961, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.057 · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.057
  6. Sioshansi F, Vojdani A. What could possibly be better than real-time pricing? Demand response, The Electricity Journal; June 2001. · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(01)00207-x
  7. Cheng C-C. Electricity demand-side management for an energy efficient future in China: technology options and policy priorities (PhD thesis). USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2005.
  8. Gellings, 1996, Then and now: the perspective of the man who coined the term ‘DSM’, Energy Policy, 24, 285, 10.1016/0301-4215(95)00134-4 · doi:10.1016/0301-4215(95)00134-4
  9. Gellings, 2000, Before demand-side management is discarded, let's see what pieces should be kept, OPEC Review, 24, 61, 10.1111/1468-0076.00075 · doi:10.1111/1468-0076.00075
  10. Lise, 2008, Long-term price and environmental effects in a liberalized electricity market, Energy Economics, 30, 230, 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.06.005 · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2006.06.005
  11. Bradley P, Leach M and Torriti J. A review of current and future costs and benefits of demand response for electricity, Centre for Environmental Strategy, Working Paper 10/11, University of Surrey; 2011.
  12. Lovins AB. The negawatts revolution. The Conference Board Magazine 1990;27(9):18–23.
  13. Devine-Wright, 2004, From demand side management to demand side participation: tracing an environmental psychology of sustainable electricity system evolution, Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 167
  14. Ofgem (2005) A review of the energy efficiency commitment 2002–2005, A report for the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, August 2005.
  15. Ofgem. A review of the energy efficiency commitment 2005–2008, A report for the secretary of state for environment, Food and Rural Affairs, August 2008.
  16. Arsenault, 1996, Hydro-Québec energy savings programs: ‘Watt’ are they worth?, Resource and Energy Economics, 18, 65, 10.1016/0928-7655(95)00015-1 · doi:10.1016/0928-7655(95)00015-1
  17. Bachrach, 2003, Energy efficiency leadership in California: preventing the next crisis, Electricity Journal, 16, 37, 10.1016/S1040-6190(03)00074-5 · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(03)00074-5
  18. Barbose, 2009, The shifting landscape of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency in the U.S., Electricity Journal, 22, 29, 10.1016/j.tej.2009.07.013 · doi:10.1016/j.tej.2009.07.013
  19. Baskette, 2006, Avoided cost estimation and post-reform funding allocation for California's energy efficiency programs, 31, 1084
  20. Baxter, 1995, Net lost revenue adjustment (NLRA) mechanisms for utility DSM programs, Energy, 20, 1215, 10.1016/0360-5442(95)00069-S · doi:10.1016/0360-5442(95)00069-s
  21. Berry, 1993, A review of the market penetration of US residential and commercial demand-side management programmes, Energy Policy, 21, 53, 10.1016/0301-4215(93)90208-W · doi:10.1016/0301-4215(93)90208-w
  22. Bradley P, Leach M, Torriti J. A review of current and future costs and benefits of demand response for electricity, Centre for Environmental Strategy, Working Paper 10/11, University of Surrey; 2011.
  23. Broc, 2011, Consistency of the French white certificates evaluation system with the framework proposed for the European energy services, Energy Efficiency, 4, 371, 10.1007/s12053-010-9100-8 · doi:10.1007/s12053-010-9100-8
  24. Carter, 2001, Breaking the consumption habit: ratemaking for efficient resource decisions, Electricity Journal, 14, 66, 10.1016/S1040-6190(01)00255-X · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(01)00255-x
  25. Chamberlin, 1995, The energy efficiency challenge: save the baby, throw out the bathwater, 8, 38
  26. Crossley, 2008, Tradeable energy efficiency certificates in Australia, Energy Efficiency, 1, 267, 10.1007/s12053-008-9018-6 · doi:10.1007/s12053-008-9018-6
  27. Dawnay, Shah Behavioural economics: seven key principles for environmental policy. In: Dietz S, Mitchie J, Oughton C. The political economy of the environment: an interdisciplinary approach, Routledge, UK; 2011. p. 74–99 [chapter 4].
  28. Didden, 2003, Demand side management in a competitive European market: who should be responsible for its implementation?, Energy Policy, 31, 1307, 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00189-1 · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00189-1
  29. Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Common rules for the internal market of electricity and repealing Council Directive 2003/54/EC, Official Journal of the European Union, European Union (EU), Brussels, Belgium; 13 July 2009.
  30. El Bakari K, Myrzik JMA, Kling WL. Prospects of a virtual power plant to control a cluster of distributed generation and renewable energy sources. In: 2009 Proceedings of the 44th international universities power engineering conference (UPEC). Glasgow, 1–4th September 2009. p. 1–5.
  31. Eto, 1996, Ratepayer-funded energy efficiency programs in a restructured electricity industry, Electricity Journal, 9, 71, 10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80290-9 · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(96)80290-9
  32. EUROGULF. An EU–GCC dialogue for energy stability and sustainability, Presentation at the Concluding Conference in Kuwait; 2–3rd April 2005, cited in: Bahgat G. Europe's energy security: challenges and opportunities, International Affairs 2006;82(5):961–75, [accessed 31.05.12], can be downloaded from: 〈http://ec.europa.eu/energy/green-paper-energy-supply/doc/studies/2005_04_eurogulf_kuwait_en.pdf〉; 2005. · DOI
  33. European Union (EU), Treaty on European Union (Consolidated Version), Treaty of Maastricht; 7 February 1992. Official Journal of the European Communities C 325/5; 24 December 2002. Available from: 〈http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b39218.html〉 [accessed 14.03.12].
  34. Fleiter, 2012, The German energy audit program for firms — a cost-effective way to improve energy efficiency?, Energy Efficiency, 5, 447, 10.1007/s12053-012-9157-7 · doi:10.1007/s12053-012-9157-7
  35. Foley, 1989, The most-value method of setting maximum DSM payments is wrong, Electricity Journal, 2, 40, 10.1016/1040-6190(89)90038-9 · doi:10.1016/1040-6190(89)90038-9
  36. Gehring, 2002, Can yesterday's demand-side management lessons become tomorrow's market solutions?, Electricity Journal, 15, 63, 10.1016/S1040-6190(02)00317-2 · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(02)00317-2
  37. Goldman, 1989, Comparative assessment of the demand-side management plans of four New York utilities, Energy, 14, 615, 10.1016/0360-5442(89)90088-1 · doi:10.1016/0360-5442(89)90088-1
  38. Harmelink, 2008, Theory-based policy evaluation of 20 energy efficiency instruments, Energy Efficiency, 1, 131, 10.1007/s12053-008-9007-9 · doi:10.1007/s12053-008-9007-9
  39. Harrington, 1997, Appliance efficiency programs in Australia: labelling and standards, Energy and Buildings, 26, 81, 10.1016/S0378-7788(96)01015-8 · doi:10.1016/s0378-7788(96)01015-8
  40. Hirsh, 1999, PURPA: the spur to competition and utility restructuring, Electricity Journal, 12, 60, 10.1016/S1040-6190(99)00060-3 · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(99)00060-3
  41. Hirst, 1987, Planning utility demand-side programs: data and analytical needs, Electric Power Systems Research, 12, 105, 10.1016/0378-7796(87)90028-9 · doi:10.1016/0378-7796(87)90028-9
  42. Hirst, 1991, Improving energy efficiency in the USA: the federal role, Energy Policy, 19, 567, 10.1016/0301-4215(91)90036-N · doi:10.1016/0301-4215(91)90036-n
  43. Hirst, 1992, Defining and reporting data on utility dsm programs, Energy, 17, 635, 10.1016/0360-5442(92)90071-7 · doi:10.1016/0360-5442(92)90071-7
  44. Hirst, 1993, Quantifying regulatory disincentives to utility DSM programs, Energy, 18, 1091, 10.1016/0360-5442(93)90081-N · doi:10.1016/0360-5442(93)90081-n
  45. Hirst, 1990, Review of demand-side data needs for least-cost utility planning, Energy, 15, 403, 10.1016/0360-5442(90)90037-3 · doi:10.1016/0360-5442(90)90037-3
  46. Hobbs, 1994, Optimal expansion of energy efficiency programs, Resource and Energy Economics, 16, 1, 10.1016/0928-7655(94)90011-6 · doi:10.1016/0928-7655(94)90011-6
  47. Hong, 2009, A close look at the China design standard for energy efficiency of public buildings, Energy and Buildings, 41, 426, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.11.003 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.11.003
  48. Hopper, 2009, Energy efficiency as a preferred resource: evidence from utility resource plans in the Western US and Canada, Energy Efficiency, 2, 1, 10.1007/s12053-008-9030-x · doi:10.1007/s12053-008-9030-x
  49. Horowitz. Purchased energy and policy impacts in the US manufacturing sector. Energy Efficiency; April 2013. · doi:10.1007/s12053-013-9200-3
  50. Houston, 1994, Can energy markets drive DSM?, Electricity Journal, 7, 46, 10.1016/1040-6190(94)90101-5 · doi:10.1016/1040-6190(94)90101-5
  51. Katz, 1992, Demand-side management: reflections of an irreverent regulator, 14, 187
  52. Kaufman, 2012, Energy efficiency program evaluations: opportunities for learning and inputs to incentive mechanisms, Energy Efficiency, 5, 242, 10.1007/s12053-011-9130-x · doi:10.1007/s12053-011-9130-x
  53. King, 1996, Public purpose energy efficiency programs and utilities in restructured markets, Electricity Journal, 9, 14, 10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80260-0 · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(96)80260-0
  54. Lee, 1994, Everyone wins! — a program to upgrade energy efficiency in manufactured housing, Electricity Journal, 7, 77, 10.1016/1040-6190(94)90014-0 · doi:10.1016/1040-6190(94)90014-0
  55. Levine, 1995, Electricity end-use efficiency: experience with technologies, markets and policies throughout the world, Energy, 20, 37, 10.1016/0360-5442(94)00055-8 · doi:10.1016/0360-5442(94)00055-8
  56. Li, 2006, Electricity deregulation, spot price patterns and demand-side management, Energy, 31, 908, 10.1016/j.energy.2005.02.018 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2005.02.018
  57. Lombard, 1999, Demand-side management through thermal efficiency in South African houses, Energy and Buildings, 29, 229, 10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00064-4 · doi:10.1016/s0378-7788(98)00064-4
  58. Macedo M. das N. Opportunities and Challenges of DSM in Smart Grid Environment, ENERGY 2013. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on smart grids, green communications and IT energy-aware technologies, ThinkMind, Lisbon, Portugal; 2013.
  59. Mallaburn PS, Eyre N. Lessons from energy efficiency policy and programmes in the UK from 1973 to 2013, Energy Efficiency; February 2013. · DOI
  60. Messenger, 1996, Recent trends in utility program funding and design in California, Electricity Journal, 9, 50, 10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80263-6 · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(96)80263-6
  61. Meyers, 1999, Demand-side carbon reduction strategies in an era of electric industry competition, Electricity Journal, 12, 72, 10.1016/S1040-6190(98)00114-6 · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(98)00114-6
  62. Nadel, 1997, The future of standards', Energy and Buildings, 26, 119, 10.1016/S0378-7788(96)01024-9 · doi:10.1016/s0378-7788(96)01024-9
  63. Nadel, 2010, Utility DSM: off the coasts and into the heartland, Electricity Journal, 23, 51, 10.1016/j.tej.2010.08.003 · doi:10.1016/j.tej.2010.08.003
  64. Newborough, 1999, Demand-side management opportunities for the UK domestic sector, IEE Proceedings–C Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 146, 283, 10.1049/ip-gtd:19990318 · doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:19990318
  65. Pacudan, 2002, Impact of energy efficiency policy to productive efficiency of electricity distribution industry in the Philippines, Energy Economics, 24, 41, 10.1016/S0140-9883(01)00085-8 · doi:10.1016/s0140-9883(01)00085-8
  66. Pierce, 2003, Déjà Vu all over again: the return of project independence and ratepayer-funded DSM, Electricity Journal, 16, 77, 10.1016/S1040-6190(03)00013-7 · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(03)00013-7
  67. Pritchett, 1993, Why industry demand-side management programs should be self-directed, Electricity Journal, 6, 34, 10.1016/1040-6190(93)90075-V · doi:10.1016/1040-6190(93)90075-v
  68. Prüggler, 2011, Storage and demand side management as power generator's strategic instruments to influence demand and prices, Energy, 36, 6308, 10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.048 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.048
  69. Pyrko, 2011, Conditions of energy efficient behaviour – a comparative study between Sweden and the UK, Energy Efficiency, 4, 393, 10.1007/s12053-010-9099-x · doi:10.1007/s12053-010-9099-x
  70. Ruff, 1992, Equity vs. efficiency: Getting DSM pricing right, Electricity Journal, 5, 24, 10.1016/1040-6190(92)90093-M · doi:10.1016/1040-6190(92)90093-m
  71. Schultz, 1990, Carrots and sticks: shared-savings incentive programs for energy efficiency, Electricity Journal, 3, 32, 10.1016/1040-6190(90)90038-B · doi:10.1016/1040-6190(90)90038-b
  72. Schweitzer, 1992, DSM collaboratives: what characteristics lead to success?, Electricity Journal, 5, 47, 10.1016/1040-6190(92)90095-O · doi:10.1016/1040-6190(92)90095-o
  73. Sioshansi, 1991, The myths and facts of energy efficiency: Survey of implementation issues, Energy Policy, 19, 231, 10.1016/0301-4215(91)90149-I · doi:10.1016/0301-4215(91)90149-i
  74. Sousa AG Martins, Jorge H. Dealing with the paradox of energy efficiency promotion by electric utilities, Energy; 2013 (in press). · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.040
  75. Sparrow, 1992, Equity, efficiency, and effectiveness in DSM rate design, Electricity Journal, 5, 25, 10.1016/1040-6190(92)90079-M · doi:10.1016/1040-6190(92)90079-m
  76. Steinfeld, 2011, Peak load characteristics of Sydney office buildings and policy recommendations for peak load reduction, Energy and Buildings, 43, 2179, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.022 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.022
  77. Sullivan, 2011, Essential to energy efficiency, but easy to explain: frequently asked questions about decoupling, Electricity Journal, 24, 56, 10.1016/j.tej.2011.09.007 · doi:10.1016/j.tej.2011.09.007
  78. Vine, 1996, International DSM and DSM program evaluation: an indeep assessment, Energy, 21, 983, 10.1016/0360-5442(96)00028-X · doi:10.1016/0360-5442(96)00028-x
  79. Vine, 2003, Public policy analysis of energy efficiency and load management in changing electricity businesses, Energy Policy, 31, 405, 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00071-X · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00071-x
  80. Wang, 2010, Demand response in China, Energy, 35, 1592, 10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.020 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.020
  81. Wiel, 1991, The electric utility as investment bank for energy efficiency, Electricity Journal, 4, 30, 10.1016/1040-6190(91)90152-J · doi:10.1016/1040-6190(91)90152-j
  82. Wirtshafter, 1992, The dramatic growth in demand-side management: too much, too soon?, 5, 36
  83. Yang, 2006, Demand side management in Nepal, Energy, 31, 2677, 10.1016/j.energy.2005.12.008 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2005.12.008
  84. Yu, 2010, Policy redesign for solving the financial bottleneck in demand side management (DSM) in China, Energy Policy, 38, 6101, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.067 · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.067
  85. Yu, 2012, How to fit demand side management (DSM) into current Chinese electricity system reform?, Energy Economics, 34, 549, 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.005 · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.005

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Warren, P.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
29
Pages
941-951
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.009
OpenAlex
W2004578488
Cited by
253
References
82
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of demand-side management policy in the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.009
The paper
Warren, P. (2014). A review of demand-side management policy in the UK. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.