Cited by 9Photovoltaic Systems and SustainabilityPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems

Development of a simple analytical model to quantify the PV module cost premium associated with module efficiency and cell technology

Kang, Moon Hee, Rohatgi, Ajeet, Ristow, Alan·2014·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Kang, M. H., Rohatgi, A., & Ristow, A.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kang, Moon Hee
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
37
Pages
380-385
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041286465
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Keywords
module efficiency, temperature coefficient of power, balance-of-system costs, levelized cost of electricity, analytical cost model, PV module selection, System Advisor Model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review