Cited by 95Bioenergy crop production and managementBiofuel production and bioconversionAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

Ranking yields of energy crops: A meta-analysis using direct and indirect comparisons

Laurent, A., Pelzer, E., Loyce, C., Makowski, D.·2015·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.023

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The higher potential for SOC sequestration of switchgrass can be attributed to a large proportion of switchgrass fine roots extending into deeper soil layers with greater rhizodeposition than Miscanthus, thereby stimulating C4-derived C contribution to SOC.

    “First, a large proportion of switchgrass fine roots (with a root diameter less than 2 mm) extended into the deeper soil layers with a subsequently greater rhizodeposition than Miscanthus , thereby stimulating C 4 - derived C contribution to SOC (Laurent et al., 2015; Powlson et al.,2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laurent, A., Pelzer, E., Loyce, C., & Makowski, D.
Affiliations
AgroParisTech (FR)
Corresponding author
Loyce, C.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
46
Pages
41-50
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019018344
Cited by
95
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • EU seventh Framework Programme (311858)
  • Logistics for Energy Crops׳ Biomass
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
energy crops, crop yield, Miscanthus × giganteus, Arundo donax, Pennisetum purpureum, Phragmites australis, Phalaris canariensis, Miscanthus sacchariflorus, Miscanthus sinensis, Erianthus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review