Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aqueous batteries as grid scale energy storage solutions

Open access
Posada, Jorge Omar Gil, Rennie, Anthony J.R., Villar, Sofia Perez, Martins, Vitor L., Marinaccio, Jordan, Barnes, Alistair, Glover, Carol F., Worsley, David A., Hall, Peter J.·2017·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Energy storage technologies are required to make full use of renewable energy sources, and electrochemical cells offer a great deal flexibility in the design of energy systems. For large scale electrochemical storage to be viable, the materials employed and device production methods need to be low cost, devices should be long lasting and safety during operation is of utmost importance. Energy and power densities are of lesser concern. For these reasons, battery chemistries that make use of aqueous electrolytes are favorable candidates where large quantities of energy need to be stored. Herein we describe several different aqueous based battery chemistries and identify some of the research challenges currently hindering their wider adoption. Lead acid batteries represent a mature technology that currently dominates the battery market, however there remain challenges that may prevent their future use at the large scale. Nickel–iron batteries have received a resurgence of interest of late and are known for their long cycle lives and robust nature however improvements in efficiency are needed in order to make them competitive. Other technologies that use aqueous electrolytes and have the potential to be useful in future large-scale applications are briefly introduced. Recent investigations in to the design of nickel–iron cells are reported with it being shown that electrolyte decomposition can be virtually eliminated by employing relatively large concentrations of iron sulfide in the electrode mixture, however this is at the expense of capacity and cycle life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Posada, J. O. G., Rennie, A. J. R., Villar, S. P., Martins, V. L., Marinaccio, J., Barnes, A., Glover, C. F., Worsley, D. A., & Hall, P. J.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
68
Pages
1174-1182
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299899083
Cited by
372
References
2
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aqueous batteries as grid scale energy storage solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.024
The paper
Posada, J. O. G., Rennie, A. J. R., Villar, S. P., Martins, V. L., Marinaccio, J., Barnes, A., Glover, C. F., Worsley, D. A., & Hall, P. J. (2017). Aqueous batteries as grid scale energy storage solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.024

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.