Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomass torrefaction: properties, applications, challenges, and economy

Niu, Yanqing, Lv, Yuan, Lei, Yu, Liu, Siqi, Liang, Yang, Wang, Denghui, Hui, Shi'en·2019·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Abstract Biomass accounts for the largest renewable energy in the world, whereas its inherent drawbacks, such as low energy and mass density, hydrophilicity, poor grindability and severe ash-related issues, inhibit its extensive utilization. Torrefaction, conducted at 200–300 °C in an inert atmosphere, successfully overcomes the abovementioned drawbacks and improves the biomass applications. Thus, a critical review is performed for the new insight into further study, involving the properties improvement of torrefied biomass, applications on combustion and gasification, as well as the intractable challenges of ash-related issues during thermal conversion and economy viability. Compared to torrefaction duration and the moisture and size of biomass, the torrefaction temperature has the strongest impact on the biomass properties improvement. Respecting physical properties (energy density and grindabilty) and chemical thermal conversion characteristics, there exists an optimal torrefaction temperature at approximate 250 °C. Biomass torrefaction is strongly dependent on the degradation of hemicellulose. Herbaceous residues possess a higher degradation ratio compared to ligneous biomass; Besides, deciduous trees mainly containing xylan in hemicellulose are more active than coniferous trees which mainly contain glucomannan in hemicellulose. The torrefied biomass possesses increased carbon content, decreased H/C and O/C ratios, increased mass energy density, similar chemical compositions with coal, and the availability for gasification and co-firing. Moreover, large amount of Cl, S, and K release during torrefaction, which bring considerable fringe benefits by reduction or elimination of the intractable ash-related issues during thermal conversion, such as slagging, agglomeration and corrosion. At present, the cost of biomass torrefaction is higher than coal. However, it can be significantly reduced by the implementation of carbon credits market, increasing torrefaction plant equipment size, and empirical cumulation. Later, more attention should be focused on application demonstration and systematic economic optimization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109395

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 124 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Niu, Y., Lv, Y., Lei, Y., Liu, S., Liang, Y., Wang, D., & Hui, S.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
115
Pages
109395
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973621049
Cited by
384
References
124
FWCI
12.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass torrefaction: properties, applications, challenges, and economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109395
The paper
Niu, Y., Lv, Y., Lei, Y., Liu, S., Liang, Y., Wang, D., & Hui, S. (2019). Biomass torrefaction: properties, applications, challenges, and economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109395

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.