The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomass torrefaction: properties, applications, challenges, and economy
Abstract
Abstract Biomass accounts for the largest renewable energy in the world, whereas its inherent drawbacks, such as low energy and mass density, hydrophilicity, poor grindability and severe ash-related issues, inhibit its extensive utilization. Torrefaction, conducted at 200–300 °C in an inert atmosphere, successfully overcomes the abovementioned drawbacks and improves the biomass applications. Thus, a critical review is performed for the new insight into further study, involving the properties improvement of torrefied biomass, applications on combustion and gasification, as well as the intractable challenges of ash-related issues during thermal conversion and economy viability. Compared to torrefaction duration and the moisture and size of biomass, the torrefaction temperature has the strongest impact on the biomass properties improvement. Respecting physical properties (energy density and grindabilty) and chemical thermal conversion characteristics, there exists an optimal torrefaction temperature at approximate 250 °C. Biomass torrefaction is strongly dependent on the degradation of hemicellulose. Herbaceous residues possess a higher degradation ratio compared to ligneous biomass; Besides, deciduous trees mainly containing xylan in hemicellulose are more active than coniferous trees which mainly contain glucomannan in hemicellulose. The torrefied biomass possesses increased carbon content, decreased H/C and O/C ratios, increased mass energy density, similar chemical compositions with coal, and the availability for gasification and co-firing. Moreover, large amount of Cl, S, and K release during torrefaction, which bring considerable fringe benefits by reduction or elimination of the intractable ash-related issues during thermal conversion, such as slagging, agglomeration and corrosion. At present, the cost of biomass torrefaction is higher than coal. However, it can be significantly reduced by the implementation of carbon credits market, increasing torrefaction plant equipment size, and empirical cumulation. Later, more attention should be focused on application demonstration and systematic economic optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis
Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., & Zheng, C. (2007) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 · Cited by 8,155
Thring, M. W. (1977) · Electronics and Power · doi:10.1049/ep.1977.0180 · Cited by 7,338
Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: A review
van der Stelt, M. J. C., Gerhauser, H., Kiel, J. H. A., & Ptasinski, K. J. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.023 · Cited by 1,262
A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications
Chen, W.-H., Peng, J., & Bi, X. T. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.039 · Cited by 1,181
Niu, Y., Tan, H., & Hui, S. (2016) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2015.09.003 · Cited by 1,069
Self-citationBridgeman, T. G., Jones, J. M., Shield, I., & Williams, P. T. (2008) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.041 · Cited by 915
Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass
Phanphanich, M., & Mani, S. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.028 · Cited by 892
The implications of chlorine-associated corrosion on the operation of biomass-fired boilers
Nielsen, H. P., Frandsen, F. J., Dam-Johansen, K., & Baxter, L. L. (2000) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/s0360-1285(00)00003-4 · Cited by 785
Influence of torrefaction on the grindability and reactivity of woody biomass
Arias, B., Pevida, C., Fermoso, J., Plaza, M. G., Rubiera, F., & Pis, J. J. (2008) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.002 · Cited by 763
Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass
Mani, S., Tabil, L. G., & Sokhansanj, S. (2004) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.03.007 · Cited by 675
Cited by
Biochar production and applications in agro and forestry systems: a review
Wang, D., Jiang, P., Zhang, H., & Yuan, W. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137775 · Cited by 280
Self-citationCahyanti, M. N., Doddapaneni, T. R. K. C., & Kikas, T. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122737 · Cited by 273
Thermochemical conversion of biomass: Potential future prospects
Wang, Y., & Wu, J. J. (2023) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113754 · Cited by 259
Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
Osman, A. I., Fang, B., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Yu, J., Farghali, M., Rashwan, A. K., Chen, Z., Chen, L., Ihara, I., et al. (2024) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-023-01694-z · Cited by 236
Abdulyekeen, K. A., Umar, A. A., Patah, M. F. A., & Daud, W. M. A. W. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111436 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Niu, Y., Lv, Y., Lei, Y., Liu, S., Liang, Y., Wang, D., & Hui, S.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 115
- Pages
- 109395
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2973621049
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 124
- FWCI
- 12.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass torrefaction: properties, applications, challenges, and economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109395
- The paper
- Niu, Y., Lv, Y., Lei, Y., Liu, S., Liang, Y., Wang, D., & Hui, S. (2019). Biomass torrefaction: properties, applications, challenges, and economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.