Cited by 142Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentRenewable energy and sustainable power systems

A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights

Xue, Shengrong, Song, Jinghui, Wang, Xiaojiao, Shang, Zezhou, Sheng, Chenjing, Li, Chongyuan, Zhu, Yufan, Liu, Jingyu·2020·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109474

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Development of the biogas sector in China has been motivated by the imperative to tackle issues associated with managing agricultural waste, alongside the state's pledge to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

    “The development of the biogas sector in China has been motivated by the imperative to tackle the issues associated with managing agricultural waste, alongside the state's pledge to mitigate the impact of greenhouse gas emissions [171].”
  • Biogas has been successfully incorporated into district heating networks throughout Europe, benefiting both rural and urban regions.

    “Whereas biogas has been successfully incorporated into district heating networks throughout Europe, benefiting both rural and urban regions [171].”
  • Rural families in China widely use small-scale biogas digesters for cooking, employing organic waste to generate biogas for domestic cooking.

    “Rural families in China widely use small-scale biogas digesters for cooking.These digesters employ organic waste to generate biogas for domestic cooking purposes [171].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xue, S., Song, J., Wang, X., Shang, Z., Sheng, C., Li, C., Zhu, Y., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
Northwest A&F University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiaojiao
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
117
Pages
109474
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981718488
Cited by
142
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016T90950, 2015M582708)
  • Northwest A and F University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41871205, 51508467)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Keywords
biogas industry, biogas policy, China-Europe comparison, biomass resources, household biogas digesters, biogas power generation, biogas subsidies, renewable energy policy, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, agricultural and rural development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review