Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine learning applications in urban building energy performance forecasting: A systematic review

Fathi, Soheil, Srinivasan, Ravi, Fenner, Andriel, Fathi, Sahand·2020·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Abstract In developed countries, buildings are involved in almost 50% of total energy use and 30% of global green-house gas emissions. Buildings' operational energy is highly dependent on various building physical, operational, and functional characteristics, as well as meteorological and temporal properties. Besides physics-based building energy modeling, machine learning techniques can provide faster and higher accuracy estimates, given buildings' historic energy consumption data. Looking beyond individual building levels, forecasting buildings’ energy performance helps city and community managers have a better understanding of their future energy needs, and plan for satisfying them more efficiently. Focusing on an urban-scale, this study systematically reviews 70 journal articles, published in the field of building energy performance forecasting between 2015 and 2018. The recent literature have been categorized according to five criteria: 1. Learning Method, 2. Building Type, 3. Energy Type, 4. Input Data, and 5. Time-scale. The scarcity of building energy performance forecasting studies in urban-scale versus individual level is considerable. There is no study incorporating building functionality in terms of space functionality share percentages, nor assessing the effects of climate change on urban buildings energy performance using machine learning approaches and future weather scenarios. There is no optimal criteria combination for achieving the most accurate machine learning-based forecast, as there is no universal measure able to provide such global comparison. Accuracy levels are highly correlated with the characteristics of forecasting problems. The goal is to provide a comprehensive status of machine learning applications in urban building energy performance forecasting, during 2015–2018.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110287

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Roth, 2008, Home energy displays, ASHRAE J, 50, 136
  2. Eia, 2014, vol. 2014
  3. Hill, 2000, vol. 2000
  4. Melillo, 2014, vol. 2014
  5. Robert, 2014, vol. 2014, 62
  6. 2003, Directive of the European parliament and of the council on the energy performance of buildings, The European Community Official Journal 2003, L001, 65
  7. Zhuang, 2015, Building cooling load prediction based on time series method and neural networks, International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, 8, 1386, 10.14257/ijgdc.2015.8.4.10 · doi:10.14257/ijgdc.2015.8.4.10
  8. Zhao, 2016, Reconstructing building stock to replicate energy consumption data, Energy Build, 117, 301, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.001 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.001
  9. Cheung, 2015, A hybrid simulation approach to predict cooling energy demand for public housing in Hong Kong, vol. 8
  10. Li, 2018, A hybrid teaching-learning artificial neural network for building electrical energy consumption prediction, Energy Build, 174, 323, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.017 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.017
  11. Rahman, 2017, Predicting fuel consumption for commercial buildings with machine learning algorithms, Energy Build, 152, 341, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.017 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.017
  12. Pombeiro, 2017, Comparative assessment of low-complexity models to predict electricity consumption in an institutional building: linear regression vs. fuzzy modeling vs. neural networks, Energy Build, 146, 141, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.032 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.032
  13. Castelli, 2015, Prediction of energy performance of residential buildings: a genetic programming approach, Energy Build, 102, 67, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.05.013 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.05.013
  14. Murphy, 2012, vol. 2012
  15. Im, 2019, Building energy use prediction owing to climate change: A case study of a university campus, Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Urban Building Energy Sensing, Controls, Big Data Analysis, and Visualization., 43

Metadata

Authors
Fathi, S., Srinivasan, R., Fenner, A., & Fathi, S.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
133
Pages
110287
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082558305
Cited by
313
References
78
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning applications in urban building energy performance forecasting: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110287
The paper
Fathi, S., Srinivasan, R., Fenner, A., & Fathi, S. (2020). Machine learning applications in urban building energy performance forecasting: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110287

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.