Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 167 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microalgae an ecofriendly and sustainable wastewater treatment option: Biomass application in biofuel and bio-fertilizer production. A review

Hussain, Fida, Shah, Syed Z., Ahmad, Habib, Abubshait, Samar A., Abubshait, Haya A., Laref, A., Manikandan, A., Kusuma, Heri S., Iqbal, Munawar·2021·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Abstract Rapidly growing industrialization and depletion of non-renewable fossil fuel has led to finding alternative viable renewable resources to meet the growing energy demand with less carbon dioxide generation. The modern world energy strategy is based on cost-effective and green alternatives and microalgae cultivation have potential to meet these criteria. Microalgae has been identified as a promising and sustainable alternative for treating wastewaters along the production of valuable products. Microalgae with a short life span, high growth rate and high CO2 utilization efficiency is one of viable techniques of renewable resources to produce biomass using nutrients in wastewater. At current, the technology and cost are the main factors that limit the application at industrial scale, which needs an ideal downstream process to minimize the production cost. The simultaneous use of microalgae for wastewater treatment and biofuel production has made these challenges practicable and economically viable. Microalgae efficiency for ammonia, phosphorus and heavy metal removal along with biofuel and bio-fertilizer production is reviewed. It is also aimed to focus on recent advances in cultivation of microalgae in wastewater, the response of microalgae to different stresses and their effects on the quality and quantity of high-value products was investigated. The prospects for future research dealing with wastewater treatment and biofuel production on downstream processing is also suggested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110603

Cites

167 of 167 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 167 references

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Hussain, F., Shah, S. Z., Ahmad, H., Abubshait, S. A., Abubshait, H. A., Laref, A., Manikandan, A., Kusuma, H. S., & Iqbal, M.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
137
Pages
110603
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112112259
Cited by
319
References
167
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microalgae an ecofriendly and sustainable wastewater treatment option: Biomass application in biofuel and bio-fertilizer production. A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110603
The paper
Hussain, F., Shah, S. Z., Ahmad, H., Abubshait, S. A., Abubshait, H. A., Laref, A., Manikandan, A., Kusuma, H. S., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Microalgae an ecofriendly and sustainable wastewater treatment option: Biomass application in biofuel and bio-fertilizer production. A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110603

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.