The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental effects of Information and Communication Technology - Exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade and financial development
Abstract
Abstract The increasing energy demand of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) devices, has drawn the attention of researchers and policymakers. Given that ICT devices are used in almost all sectors of the economy, any effort towards climate-change mitigation should consider the carbon-footprint of the ICT sector. In this study, we analyze the direct effects of ICT on environment as well as the indirect effects through interaction with renewable energy, innovation, trade, and financial development using Driscoll-Kraay Panel Corrected Estimators for 16 emerging countries from 2000 to 2018. We also examine the presence of Environmental Kuznets’ Curve (EKC) hypothesis for the entire sample. We find that increasing internet-use, renewable-energy consumption and trade significantly reduces CO2 emission, while increase in non-renewable energy consumption significantly increases emission. Interaction between innovation and internet-use jointly reduces CO2 emission. Similarly, renewable-energy, innovation, trade and financial-development reduce the CO2 emission from increased mobile-use. EKC hypothesis is found to be present for both internet and mobile-use. For internet-use, the emerging economies have already reached the turning point of EKC whereby increasing internet-penetration reduces CO2 emission. However, mobile-use has not yet reached its turning point of the EKC curve. Robustness check using Bootstrapped Panel-Quantile Regression also confirms that internet-use and renewable-energy consumption reduces CO2 emission, whereas innovation and non-renewable energy consumption increases emission across all quantiles. The results suggest that the emerging economies can safely increase internet-use and related applications to reduce emission. They should also increase the use of renewables and green-innovation technologies in telecommunication-sector to reduce their adverse effects on the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and AutocorrelationConsistent Covariance Matrix
Newey, W., & West, K. (1986) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/t0055 · Cited by 12,278
The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297111 · Cited by 8,982
The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005
Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data
Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465398557825 · Cited by 6,865
Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels
Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014 · Cited by 5,922
Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional Dependence
Hoechle, D. (2007) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0700700301 · Cited by 3,333
General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels
Pesaran, M. H. (2021) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7 · Cited by 2,707
A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data
Canay, I. A. (2011) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1368-423x.2011.00349.x · Cited by 1,179
Cited by
Does digital investment affect carbon efficiency? Spatial effect and mechanism discussion
Xu, Q., Zhong, M., & Cao, M. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154321 · Cited by 201
Charfeddine, L., & Umlai, M. (2023) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113482 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Haldar, A., & Sethi, N.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 153
- Pages
- 111754
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3205623521
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 41.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental effects of Information and Communication Technology - Exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade and financial development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111754
- The paper
- Haldar, A., & Sethi, N. (2022). Environmental effects of Information and Communication Technology - Exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.