Cited by 201Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthEfficiency Analysis Using DEADigital Economy and Transformation

Does digital investment affect carbon efficiency? Spatial effect and mechanism discussion

Xu, Qiong, Zhong, Meirui, Cao, Mengyuan·2022·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Digitalization supported by ICT capital is a core weapon for decoupling economic growth from carbon emissions. This research innovatively calculates ICT capital in China from 2001 to 2018 and explores how ICT capital affects carbon emission efficiency and its spatial spillover effects from a digital investment perspective. The empirical results prove that ICT capital contributes to improvement of carbon emission efficiency, pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency and technological progress. Furthermore, interestingly, ICT communication capital was found to have the strongest effect on improving carbon emission efficiency, while ICT hardware capital and software capital have a weaker effect. The spatial effect demonstrates that ICT capital not only helps improve the local carbon emission efficiency but also has spatial spillovers to the surrounding areas and has the most prominent effect on the carbon emission efficiency of the central region. The mediation tests illustrate that ICT capital improves carbon emission efficiency by promoting technological innovation, alleviating industrial structure distortions, enhancing resource allocation efficiency and accelerating human capital accumulation. These findings have important policy guiding significance for the region to stimulate the potential of ICT capital and facilitate the low-carbon transformation of the economy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154321

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Q., Zhong, M., & Cao, M.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhong, Meirui
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
827
Pages
154321
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220952087
Cited by
201
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 21
FWCI
36.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (18ZDA049, 18ZDA061, 21&ZD103)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University (2021znzk01)
  • Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71633006, 71874207)
  • National Major Science and Technology Projects of China
  • Central South University (2019CX016)
  • National Development and Reform Commission
  • Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province (18ZWB19)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Economy and Transformation
Keywords
ICT capital, digital investment, carbon efficiency, spatial spillover effects, pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency, technological progress, technological innovation, allocative efficiency, human capital accumulation, low-carbon transition, China
MeSH terms
Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, China, Efficiency, Humans, Industry, Economic Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review