Multiple dimensions of social background and horizontal educational attainment in Sweden
Open accessAbstract
We follow Swedish cohorts born between 1976 and 1984 through their educational career and analyze how different dimensions of parents’ socio-economic standing (SES) in education, occupation, income, and wealth structure horizontal attainment in secondary tracks and tertiary fields. Our results show that there is strong horizontal segregation by parents’ SES. However, the influence of social background dimensions on educational attainment is not uniform, but differ by combination of dimension and track or field. We identify a main contrast between parents’ education, and to some extent occupation, on the one hand, and the economic dimensions of income and wealth on the other. When we assess the total contribution of all dimensions, we find that net of previous achievement about 35% of the attainment of different upper-secondary tracks, and 25% of attainment of different tertiary fields is due to social background. Despite the non-uniform pattern, this segregation is also linked to future inequality, i.e. in chances of tertiary graduation linked to upper-secondary tracks and in expected earnings linked to tertiary field choices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Sweden, conditional on previous achievement, about 25 percent of the variation in tertiary field choices can be explained by parental background (parents' education, occupation, income, and wealth).
“For example, Hällsten and Thaning (2018) find that conditional on previous achievement, about 25 percent of the variation in tertiary field choices in Sweden can be explained by parental background (parents' education, occupation, income, and wealth).”
From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Hällsten and Thaning (2018)
Cites
Wealth Inequality and Accumulation
Killewald, A., Pfeffer, F. T., & Schachner, J. N. (2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053331 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Grand Advantage: Family Wealth and Grandchildren’s Educational Achievement in Sweden
Hällsten, M., & Pfeffer, F. T. (2017) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122417695791 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blanden, J., Doepke, M., & Stuhler, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29979 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hällsten, M., & Thaning, M.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Hällsten, Martin
- Venue
- Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 40-52
- ISSN
- 0276-5624 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2811256708
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research in Social Stratification and Mobility (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Swedish Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- social background, parental socioeconomic status, educational attainment, school segregation, parental education, parental occupation, parental income, parental wealth, educational inequality, wage inequality, Swedish cohort
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review