Cited by 187Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceSocial and Cultural Dynamics

Grand Advantage: Family Wealth and Grandchildren’s Educational Achievement in Sweden

Open access
Hällsten, Martin, Pfeffer, Fabian T.·2017·American Sociological Review

Abstract

We study the role of family wealth for children’s educational achievement using novel Swedish register data. In particular, we focus on the relationship between grandparents’ wealth and their grandchildren’s educational achievement. Doing so allows us to reliably establish the independent role of wealth in contributing to long-term inequalities in opportunity. We use regression models with extensive controls to account for observed socioeconomic characteristics of families, cousin fixed effects to net out potentially unobserved grandparent effects, and marginal structural models to account for endogenous selection. We find substantial associations between grandparents’ wealth and their grandchildren’s grade point averages (GPA) in the 9th grade that are only partly mediated by parents’ socioeconomic characteristics and wealth. Our findings indicate that family wealth inequality—even in a comparatively egalitarian context like Sweden—has profound consequences for the distribution of opportunity across multiple generations. We posit that our estimates of the long-term consequences of wealth inequality may be conservative for nations other than Sweden, like the United States, where family wealth—in addition to its insurance and normative functions—allows the direct purchase of educational quality and access.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122417695791

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A direct effect of grandparents on their grandchildren is possible through means that do not require contact, such as financial transfers.

    “However, there are exceptions (Zeng and Xie 2014), and a direct effect of grandparents on their grandchildren is possible through means that do not require contact, such as financial transfers (Hällsten and Pfeffer 2017).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Hällsten and Pfeffer 2017

    The Discussion reports a direct association between grandparental wealth and grandchildren’s educational achievement beyond parent-mediated transmission. The Theoretical Background mentions direct transfers, but our copy does not establish financial transfers as the mechanism for that association or address whether it requires contact. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Khan Shamus Rahman 2011 Privilege: The making of an adolescent elite at St. Paul’s school Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
  2. Morgan Stephen L Kim Young-Mi 2006 Mobility and inequality: frontiers of research in sociology and economics Morgan S Grusky D Fields G Stanford Univ Press
  3. Pfeffer Fabian 2010 Wealth and Opportunity in the United States and Germany PhD Thesis Madison, WI University of Wisconsin

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hällsten, M., & Pfeffer, F. T.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Hällsten, Martin
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2017-03-07
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
328-360
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2593160432
Cited by
187
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
39.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Institutet för arbetsmarknads- och utbildningspolitisk politisk utvärdering
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD041028, P2CHD041028)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
Keywords
family wealth, academic performance, intergenerational transmission, grandchildren, educational inequality, socioeconomic disparities, grade point average, marginal structural models, endogenous selection, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review