Cited by 196Infrared Thermography in MedicineEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockAnimal health and immunology

The use of infrared thermography as an early indicator of bovine respiratory disease complex in calves

Open access
Schaefer, A.L., Cook, N.J., Church, J.S., Basarab, J., Perry, B., Miller, C., Tong, A.K.W.·2007·Research in Veterinary Science

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex causes considerable distress to domestic livestock and economic hardship to the beef industry. Furthermore, the resulting extensive use of antimicrobial treatments is a growing concern from the perspective of facilitating antibiotic resistant microbes. The earlier detection of BRD would enable an earlier, more targeted treatment regime and earlier isolation of infected individuals. The objective of the present study was to investigate the use of non-invasive infrared thermography in the early detection of BRD in cattle. Studies were conducted on 133 head of weaned calves. Data demonstrated that infrared thermography was able to identify animals at early stages of illness, often several days to over one week before clinical signs were manifest. Data indicated that 4-6 days prior to the onset of clinical symptoms of BRD, greater positive and negative predictive values and test efficiency for infrared thermography (80%, 65% and 71%, respectively) compared to the industry standard practice of clinical scoring (70%, 45% and 55%, respectively).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.01.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In laboratory conditions, IRT has demonstrated remarkable accuracy in identifying increased eye temperatures in beef calves up to four to six days before emergence of observable BRD signs.

    “In laboratory conditions, IRT has demonstrated remarkable accuracy in identifying increased eye temperatures in beef calves up to four to six days before the emergence of observable BRD signs [77].”

    From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [77]

    The Results report that IRT identified calves that would develop clinical BRD 4–6 days later significantly better than clinical scores or core temperature. But the Introduction describes this study as investigating spontaneously occurring BRD, not laboratory-induced disease; its reference to controlled conditions concerns an earlier BVD study. Results Table 2 also shows that the difference in orbital temperatures at 4–6 days was not statistically significant (P = 0.34), so the claim overstates the evidence for increased eye temperature itself. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference, 1992. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 20 (6), 864–874. 1597042
  2. Canadian Council on Animal Care, 1993. Olfert, E.D., Cross, B.M., McWilliam, A.A (Eds.), Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, vol. 1, second ed. CCAC, Ottawa, ON.
  3. Cusack P.M.V. McMeniman N. Lean I.J. The medicine and epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease complex in feedlot Aust. Vet. J. 81 2003 480 487 15086084
  4. Galen R.S. Gambino S.R. Beyond Normality 1975 J. Wiley and Sons N.Y
  5. Hart B.L. Biological basis of the behaviour of sick animals Neurosci. Behav. Rev. 12 1988 123 137 3050629
  6. Humblet M.F. Coghe J. Lekeux P. Godeau J.M. Acute phase proteins assessment for an early selection of treatments in growing calves suffering from bronchopneumonia under field conditions Res. Vet. Sci. 77 2004 41 47 15120951
  7. Jericho K.W.F. Kozub G.C. Experimental infectious respiratory disease in groups of calves: lobular distribution, variance, and sample size requirements for vaccine evaluation Can. J. Vet. Res. 68 2004 118 127 15188956 PMC1142155
  8. Kaneko J.J. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals 1980 Academic Press NY
  9. McMullin B.R. Chittock D.R. Roscoe D.L. Garcha H. Wang L. Miller C.C. The antimicrobial effect of nitric oxide on bacteria that cause nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit Respir. Care 50 11 2005 1451 1456 16253152
  10. Mellon M. Benbrook C. Benbrook K.L. Hogging It. Estimates of Antimicrobial Abuse in Livestock. Union of Concerned Scientists 2001 UCS Publications Cambridge, MA
  11. National Research Council (NRC), 1984. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, sixth ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  12. Shahriar F.M. Clark E.G. Janzen E. West K. Wobeser G. Coinfection with bovine viral diarrhea virus and Mycoplasma bovis in feedlot cattle with chronic pneumonia Can. Vet. J. 43 2002 863 868 12497963 PMC339759
  13. Thrusfield M. Diagnostic testing P 266-285 Veterinary Epidemiology second ed. 1995 Blackwell Sci. Ltd. Oxford
  14. Wittum T.E. Woolen N.E. Perino L.J. Littledike E.T. Relationships among treatment for respiratory tract disease, pulmonary lesions evident at slaughter and rate of weight gain in feedlot cattle J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 209 1996 814 818 8756886
  15. Zweig M.H. Campbell G. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine Clin. Chem. 39 4 1993 561 577 8472349

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaefer, A. L., Cook, N. J., Church, J. S., Basarab, J., Perry, B., Miller, C., & Tong, A. K. W.
Affiliations
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
  • Agriculture Food and Rural Development (CA)
Corresponding author
Schaefer, A.L.
Venue
Research in Veterinary Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
376-384
ISSN
0034-5288 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141081365
Cited by
196
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Veterinary Science (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Infrared Thermography in Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
Keywords
infrared thermography, bovine respiratory disease, calves, early disease detection, non-invasive diagnosis, clinical scoring, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, test efficiency, antibiotic resistance, beef cattle
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Infrared Rays, Predictive Value of Tests, Thermography, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review