Cited by 24Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismInnovations in Medical EducationGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research

Effectiveness of pharmacogenomics educational interventions on healthcare professionals and health professions students: A systematic review

Open access
Omran, Safa, Leong, Siew Lian, Blebil, Ali, Mohan, Devi, Teoh, Siew Li·2023·Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The field of pharmacogenomics is rapidly advancing, but its adoption and implementation remain slow and lacking. Lack of pharmacogenomics knowledge among healthcare professionals is the most frequently cited barrier to adopting and implementing pharmacogenomics in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to critically evaluate and determine the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving pharmacogenomics knowledge and practice. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO. Studies on pharmacogenomics educational interventions for health care professionals and students with pre- and post-intervention assessments and results were included. No restrictions were placed on time, language, or educational contexts. The educational outcomes measured include both objective and subjective outcomes. The pharmacogenomics competency domains used to judge educational interventions are based on the competency domains listed by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacies (AACP). The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health was used for the quality assessment of pre-post studies with no control group and the controlled intervention studies. No meta-analysis was conducted; the data were synthesized qualitatively. The systematic review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Fifty studies were included in this review. All included studies integrated the AACP pharmacogenomics competency domains into their educational interventions. Most of the studies had educational interventions that integrated clinical cases (n = 44; 88%). Knowledge was the most frequently evaluated outcome (n = 34; 68%) and demonstrated significant improvement after the educational intervention that integrated AACP pharmacogenomics competency domains and employed active learning with clinical case inclusion. CONCLUSION: This review provided evidence of the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving pharmacogenomics knowledge and practice. Incorporating pharmacogenomics competency domains into education and training, with patient cases for healthcare professionals and students, dramatically improved their pharmacogenomics knowledge, attitudes, and confidence in practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.07.012

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLMs have been utilized in diverse contexts within medical education and language translation, including licensing examinations, generation of multiple-choice questions, evaluation of medical tests, rehabilitation education, pharmacogenomics, and translation of medical imaging reports into layman's terms.

    “The LLMs have been utilized in diverse contexts within medical education and language translation.These include applications in licensing examinations such as the USMLE and the JMLE, the generation of multiple-choice questions, the evaluation of medical tests, educational initiatives in rehabilitation, and pharmacogenomics, as well as the translation of complex medical imaging reports into layman”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ya'u Adamu, Binti Husain Rohayah, Haque M. A systematic review of knowledge, attitude and practice towards pharmacogenomics among doctors. Int J Pharmaceut Res. 2015;7(1):9-16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omran, S., Leong, S. L., Blebil, A., Mohan, D., & Teoh, S. L.
Affiliations
Monash University Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Teoh, Siew Li
Venue
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
1399-1411
ISSN
1551-7411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385431688
Cited by
24
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Cronfa (Swansea University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Keywords
pharmacogenomics, educational intervention, healthcare workers, health professions students, active learning, implementation barriers
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Educational Status, Health Personnel, Humans, Pharmacogenetics, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review