Cited by 277Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein structure prediction: when is it useful?

Open access
Zhang, Yang·2009·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

Computationally predicted three-dimensional structure of protein molecules has demonstrated the usefulness in many areas of biomedicine, ranging from approximate family assignments to precise drug screening. For nearly 40 years, however, the accuracy of the predicted models has been dictated by the availability of close structural templates. Progress has recently been achieved in refining low-resolution models closer to the native ones; this has been made possible by combining knowledge-based information from multiple sources of structural templates as well as by improving the energy funnel of physics-based force fields. Unfortunately, there has been no essential progress in the development of techniques for detecting remotely homologous templates and for predicting novel protein structures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.02.005

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yang
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
145-155
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140564438
Cited by
277
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • KU ScholarWorks (University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083107)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein structure prediction, template-based structure prediction, structural templates, knowledge-based potentials, force fields, remote homology detection, drug screening
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Structure-Activity Relationship, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review