Cited by 214Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchProtein purification and stabilityProtein Structure and Dynamics

Camelid and shark single domain antibodies: Structural features and therapeutic potential

Könning, Doreen, Zielonka, Stefan, Grzeschik, Julius, Empting, Martin, Valldorf, Bernhard, Krah, Simon, Schröter, Christian, Sellmann, Carolin +2 more·2017·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

In addition to canonical antibodies composed of heavy and light chains, the adaptive immune systems of camelids and cartilaginous fish comprise heavy-chain only isotypes (HcAb) devoid of light chains, where antigen-binding is mediated exclusively by one variable domain. Due to their inherent favorable attributes, such as high affinity and specificity for their cognate antigen, extraordinary stability, small size and, most importantly, the possibility to complement classical antibodies in terms of 'drugable' target-space, HcAb-derived entities evolved as promising candidates for biomedical applications of which many have already proven to be successful in early stage clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.10.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extended CDR3 loop of nanobodies has the capacity to form a finger-like structure with greater structural flexibility, likely fixed in one single conformation upon antigen-binding.

    “The extended CDR3 loop of nanobodies has the capacity to form a finger-like structure with greater structural flexibility which, in turn, is likely fixed in one single conformation upon antigen-binding [14,15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Könning, D., Zielonka, S., Grzeschik, J., Empting, M., Valldorf, B., Krah, S., Schröter, C., Sellmann, C., Hock, B., & Kolmar, H.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
  • Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (DE)
  • Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Hock, Björn
  • Kolmar, Harald
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
45
Pages
10-16
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2550623601
Cited by
214
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Technische Universität Darmstadt
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
nanobodies, camelid antibodies, heavy-chain antibodies, antibody structure, therapeutic antibodies, antibody engineering, antibody stability, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Camelidae, Protein Domains, Animals, Humans, Sharks, Single-Domain Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review