Cited by 84Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationProtein Structure and Dynamics

sdAb-DB: the single domain antibody database

Wilton, Emily E., Opyr, Michael P., Kailasam, Senthilkumar, Kothe, Ronja F., Wieden, Hans-Joachim·2018·ACS Synthetic Biology

Abstract

The Single Domain Antibody Database, or sdAb-DB, ( www.sdab-db.ca ) is the first freely available repository for single domain antibodies and related classes of proteins. Due to their small size, modular structure, and ease of expression, single domain antibodies (sdAb) have a wide range of applications, including as a rational design tool, and are therefore of great interest for synthetic biologists and bioengineers. However, to enable effective use and sharing of existing sdAbs, including those with engineered functions ( e.g., fusions with fluorescent proteins), as well as the rational design and engineering of new sdAbs, it is necessary to have access to sequences and experimental data. We have therefore developed a publicly available, sdAb-focused database, providing access to manually curated sdAb data from protein databases, published scientific articles, and user submissions. The sdAb-DB is an open-source repository and sharing platform for the sdAb community, providing access to performance data and basic bioinformatic tools for use with previously described and validated sdAbs, as well as for the engineering of new sdAb-based designs and proteins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00407

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are more focused repositories of antibodies, such as CoV-AbDab for anticoronavirus antibodies, and sdAb-DB for single-domain antibodies and related classes of proteins.

    “Furthermore, there are more focused repositories of antibodies, such as CoV-AbDab [19] for anticoronavirus antibodies, and sdAb-DB [20] for single-domain antibodies and related classes of proteins.”
  • Most repositories collect both antibody and nanobody data; however, there are also some databases specializing only in the latter, e.g. sdAb-DB.

    “Most of these repositories collect both antibody and nanobody data; however, there are also some databases specializing only in the latter, e.g. sdAb-DB [58].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilton, E. E., Opyr, M. P., Kailasam, S., Kothe, R. F., & Wieden, H.-J.
Affiliations
University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
Wieden, Hans-Joachim
Venue
ACS Synthetic Biology
Published
2018-11-16
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
2480-2484
ISSN
2161-5063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901953282
Cited by
84
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Synthetic Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alberta Innovates (Strategic Chairs Program, SC60-T2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
nanobodies, protein databases, antibody engineering, synthetic biology, fluorescent protein fusion, rational protein design, open-source database
MeSH terms
User-Computer Interface, Databases, Protein, Bioengineering, Synthetic Biology, Single-Domain Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review