Binding without folding – the biomolecular function of disordered polyelectrolyte complexes
Abstract
Recent evidence shows that oppositely charged intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) can form high-affinity complexes that involve neither the formation of secondary or tertiary structure nor site-specific interactions between individual residues. Similar electrostatically dominated interactions have also been identified for positively charged IDPs binding to nucleic acids. These highly disordered polyelectrolyte complexes constitute an extreme case within the spectrum of biomolecular interactions involving disorder. Such interactions are likely to be widespread, since sequence analysis predicts proteins with highly charged disordered regions to be surprisingly numerous. Here, we summarize the insights that have emerged from the highly disordered polyelectrolyte complexes identified so far, and we highlight recent developments and future challenges in (i) establishing models for the underlying highly dynamic structural ensembles, (ii) understanding the novel binding mechanisms associated with them, and (iii) identifying the functional consequences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disordered proteins and regions are characterized by broad and heterogeneous ensembles with small differences in relative conformational stabilities and low barriers.
“Disordered proteins (regions) are characterized by broad and heterogeneous ensembles where the differences in the relative conformational stabilities are small, or even minor and the barriers are low.”
From AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery (2022) · cites this paper as [135]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 102 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Schuler, B., Borgia, A., Borgia, M. B., Heidarsson, P. O., Holmstrom, E. D., Nettels, D., & Sottini, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
- University of Iceland (IS)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schuler, Benjamin
- ORCID
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 66-76
- ISSN
- 0959-440X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2998146374
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- intrinsically disordered proteins, polyelectrolyte complexes, electrostatic interactions, protein-nucleic acid binding, protein-protein binding, binding mechanism, structural ensembles, protein charge, biomolecular interactions
- MeSH terms
- Polyelectrolytes, Animals, Humans, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review