Cited by 91Protein Structure and DynamicsElectrostatics and Colloid InteractionsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Binding without folding – the biomolecular function of disordered polyelectrolyte complexes

Schuler, Benjamin, Borgia, Alessandro, Borgia, Madeleine B, Heidarsson, Pétur O, Holmstrom, Erik D, Nettels, Daniel, Sottini, Andrea·2020·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

Recent evidence shows that oppositely charged intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) can form high-affinity complexes that involve neither the formation of secondary or tertiary structure nor site-specific interactions between individual residues. Similar electrostatically dominated interactions have also been identified for positively charged IDPs binding to nucleic acids. These highly disordered polyelectrolyte complexes constitute an extreme case within the spectrum of biomolecular interactions involving disorder. Such interactions are likely to be widespread, since sequence analysis predicts proteins with highly charged disordered regions to be surprisingly numerous. Here, we summarize the insights that have emerged from the highly disordered polyelectrolyte complexes identified so far, and we highlight recent developments and future challenges in (i) establishing models for the underlying highly dynamic structural ensembles, (ii) understanding the novel binding mechanisms associated with them, and (iii) identifying the functional consequences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disordered proteins and regions are characterized by broad and heterogeneous ensembles with small differences in relative conformational stabilities and low barriers.

    “Disordered proteins (regions) are characterized by broad and heterogeneous ensembles where the differences in the relative conformational stabilities are small, or even minor and the barriers are low.”

    From AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery (2022) · cites this paper as [135]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 91

Authors
Schuler, B., Borgia, A., Borgia, M. B., Heidarsson, P. O., Holmstrom, E. D., Nettels, D., & Sottini, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Schuler, Benjamin
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
60
Pages
66-76
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998146374
Cited by
91
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, polyelectrolyte complexes, electrostatic interactions, protein-nucleic acid binding, protein-protein binding, binding mechanism, structural ensembles, protein charge, biomolecular interactions
MeSH terms
Polyelectrolytes, Animals, Humans, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review