AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery
Open accessAbstract
AlphaFold has burst into our lives. A powerful algorithm that underscores the strength of biological sequence data and artificial intelligence (AI). AlphaFold has appended projects and research directions. The database it has been creating promises an untold number of applications with vast potential impacts that are still difficult to surmise. AI approaches can revolutionize personalized treatments and usher in better-informed clinical trials. They promise to make giant leaps toward reshaping and revamping drug discovery strategies, selecting and prioritizing combinations of drug targets. Here, we briefly overview AI in structural biology, including in molecular dynamics simulations and prediction of microbiota-human protein-protein interactions. We highlight the advancements accomplished by the deep-learning-powered AlphaFold in protein structure prediction and their powerful impact on the life sciences. At the same time, AlphaFold does not resolve the decades-long protein folding challenge, nor does it identify the folding pathways. The models that AlphaFold provides do not capture conformational mechanisms like frustration and allostery, which are rooted in ensembles, and controlled by their dynamic distributions. Allostery and signaling are properties of populations. AlphaFold also does not generate ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins and regions, instead describing them by their low structural probabilities. Since AlphaFold generates single ranked structures, rather than conformational ensembles, it cannot elucidate the mechanisms of allosteric activating driver hotspot mutations nor of allosteric drug resistance. However, by capturing key features, deep learning techniques can use the single predicted conformation as the basis for generating a diverse ensemble.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
AlphaFold has transformed protein structure prediction by leveraging deep learning and large sequence/structure databases, with major implications for structural biology, drug discovery, and microbiome–host interaction studies. However, because it outputs single ranked structures rather than conformational ensembles, it cannot directly resolve allostery, frustration, folding pathways, or intrinsically disordered protein ensembles.
Key findings
- AlphaFold predicts 3D protein structures at or near experimental resolution; it achieved scores near 90 even on difficult targets in the 2020 CASP, was trained on PDB chains and sequence databases, and “illuminates half of the dark human proteins.” The PDB is described as nearing 200,000 experimentally determined structures, and over 180,000 protein structures are available in the PDB database.
- AlphaFold does not solve the protein folding problem or identify folding pathways; its models are rigid and do not capture conformational mechanisms such as frustration and allostery, which are rooted in ensembles and controlled by dynamic distributions. It also does not generate ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins/regions, instead describing them by low structural probabilities.
- Because AlphaFold generates single ranked structures rather than conformational ensembles, it cannot directly elucidate mechanisms of allosteric activating driver hotspot mutations or allosteric drug resistance. Its predicted structures can, however, be submitted to MD simulations to generate ensembles, and AI/deep-learning methods can accelerate and enhance MD simulations.
- AI approaches are also discussed for human–microbiome protein–protein interaction prediction, drug repurposing, and selecting drug target combinations; allosteric drugs are described as having “anchor” and “driver” atoms, where driver atoms initiate the allosteric signal by shifting receptor populations.
Methods
- This is a review/overview/perspective article, not a primary experimental study; it synthesizes AI in structural biology, molecular dynamics, human–microbiome PPI prediction, drug discovery, and allostery.
- It uses illustrative examples, including SHP2 (X-ray structure PDB ID: 4DGP missing flexible-region residues predicted by AlphaFold), B-Raf kinase OFF-state (PDB ID: 3SKC) and ON-state (PDB ID: 6UAN) conformations compared with an AlphaFold structure, and Cdc42/GEF mimicry examples (PDB IDs: 2WMO, 1GZS, 3GCG).
- Main analysis is conceptual and literature-based, with figures; no new dataset, sample, statistical analysis, or systematic review methodology is reported.
Limitations
- The paper states that AlphaFold cannot directly address allosteric mechanisms, population shifts, folding pathways, or IDP/IDR ensembles; it generates single ranked structures, and current allosteric binding-site prediction approaches address stable interactions at the site but not initiation of effective allosteric signals.
- The paper states that even though MD simulations of AlphaFold models could address dynamics, at the required scales the cost is prohibitive, and a paradigm-shifting machine learning method is needed to model protein dynamics.
- Evident from the text: as a brief overview/perspective, it provides no primary validation, no quantitative synthesis, and no systematic assessment of the AI methods discussed.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 96 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
The authors have developed an algorithm and server to predict human host-microbial protein-protein interactions (HMIs) based on their protein structures, which can be experimental or modeled.
“We have developed an algorithm and server to predict these human host–microbial PPIs (HMIs) based on their protein structures, which can be experimental or modeled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AlphaFold combines deep learning innovations to predict three-dimensional protein structures at or near experimental scale resolution.
“AlphaFold has combined numerous deep learning innovations to predict the three-dimensional (3D) structures of proteins at or near experimental scale resolution”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
AlphaFold models do not capture conformational mechanisms such as frustration and allostery, which are rooted in ensembles and controlled by dynamic distributions.
“The models that AlphaFold provides do not capture conformational mechanisms like frustration and allostery, which are rooted in ensembles, and controlled by their dynamic distributions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Prediction of the structures of intrinsically disordered proteins and regions is a problem where AlphaFold falls short.
“prediction of the structures of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and regions (IDRs) is another problem where AlphFold falls short.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AlphaFold can indirectly assist in unraveling mechanisms of allosteric hotspot mutations and allosteric drug discovery by providing rigid structures that can be submitted to MD simulations to generate ensembles.
“The rigid structures that AlphaFold predicts can be submitted to MD simulations that generate such ensembles”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Interpretationnone given
AlphaFold cannot handle population shifts.
“AlphaFold cannot handle population shifts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Current approaches to predict allosteric binding sites address only stable interactions at the site, not initiation of effective allosteric signals.
“Current approaches to predict allosteric binding sites address only the former.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The small 5-10 kcal/mol difference in stability between native and denatured states compounded the challenge for protein structure prediction methods.
“The small (5–10 kcal/mol) difference in the stability of the native structures as compared to the denatured states151 compounded the challenge that predicting methods faced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The cellular processes described would not have been possible if the protein existed in a single structure or flipped between only two states, active and inactive.
“All these processes which take place in the cell would not have been possible had the protein existed in a single structure or was flipping between only two states, active and inactive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Frustration is a powerful tool harnessed by evolution for function.
“Frustration is thus a powerful tool harnessed by evolution for function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [174] Bosshard B., 1983, Morphol Med.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The innovation in development and integration of MD simulations with deep learning can reproduce, interpret, predict, and generate data relating to the behavior of biological macromolecules.
“The innovation in the development and integration of MD simulations with deep learning can reproduce, interpret, predict, and generate data relating to the behavior of biological macromolecules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked - Premisecitation
Deep learning has already been exploited in structural modeling and design, analysis, and linking these to function.
“Deep learning has also been already exploited in structural modeling and design60,194−196 and analysis191 and linking these to function.197”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [60] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [194] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [195] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [196] Ingraham, J.; Riesselman, A.; Sander, C.; Marks, D. Learning protein structure with a differentiable simulator. https://openreview.net/forum?id=Byg3y3C9Km (accessed Sep 27, 2019).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [191] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Pathogen proteins can have surfaces that resemble host protein surfaces, allowing them to mimic and compete with host protein interactions.
“Mechanistically, pathogen proteins can have surfaces which resemble those of the host, allowing them to mimic and compete with host protein interactions (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisenone given
The interaction surfaces of bacterial GEF mimicries resemble the host protein, allowing them to mimic and compete with host protein interactions.
“The interaction surfaces of these bacterial GEF mimicries resemble the host protein, allowing them to mimic and compete with the host protein interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Bacterial toxins or effectors mimicking GEF proteins, such as SopE from Salmonella and MAP from Escherichia coli, can interact with Cdc42 and activate it.
“Bacterial secretes toxins or effectors mimicking the GEF proteins, such as SopE (PDB: 1GZS) from Salmonella208 and MAP (PDB: 3GCG) from Escherichia coli,209 can interact with Cdc42 and activate it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Human-microbiome protein-protein interactions promote GTPase activation.
“Figure 3 Human–microbiome PPIs promote GTPase activation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The availability of protein structures is insufficient.
“Nonetheless, the availability of the structures is insufficient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: To date, over 180,000 protein structures are available in the PDB database, open to all researchers worldwide.
- Rests on an assumption: Structures of pathogens are not within the PDB, and neither are many other structures essential to human health.
- May combine two claims. 36
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 38
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAlphaFold does not resolve the protein folding problem and does not identify folding pathways.
“AlphaFold does not resolve the decades-long protein folding challenge, nor does it identify the folding pathways.”
- Also stated in: § Protein Folding · plain
“Neither AlphaFold nor broadly other protein structure prediction algorithms consider folding pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [51] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [52] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Protein Folding · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlphaFold is trained on protein chains from the PDB and uses the input sequence to query protein sequence databases to construct a multiple sequence alignment.
“It has been trained on protein chains from the PDB and uses the input sequence to query databases of protein sequences to construct a multiple sequence alignment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningDeep learning techniques can use AlphaFold's single predicted conformation as the basis for generating a diverse ensemble.
“However, by capturing key features, deep learning techniques can use the single predicted conformation as the basis for generating a diverse ensemble.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlphaFold's success has not led to a deeper mechanistic understanding of how a protein sequence folds, and it does not assist in folding a protein from its sequence.
“However, its striking success has not led us to a deeper mechanistic understanding of exactly how a protein sequence folds, thus not assisting in the folding of a protein from its sequence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause AlphaFold generates single ranked structures rather than conformational ensembles, it cannot elucidate the mechanisms of allosteric activating driver hotspot mutations or allosteric drug resistance.
“Since AlphaFold generates single ranked structures, rather than conformational ensembles, it cannot elucidate the mechanisms of allosteric activating driver hotspot mutations nor of allosteric drug resistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAllostery and signaling are properties of populations.
“Allostery and signaling are properties of populations.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Allostery, where the signal propagates dynamically with the shifts in the populations, underlies regulation and thus cell life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAlphaFold, which predicts single ranked structures for a protein sequence, is unable to address directly allosteric mechanisms, which are based on populations of conformational states in ensembles.
“AlphaFold, which predicts single ranked structures for a protein sequence, is unable to address directly allosteric mechanisms, which are based on the populations of conformational states in the ensembles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [101] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [102] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [103] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [104] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [105] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [106] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [107] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [108] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [109] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [110] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlphaFold does not generate ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins and regions; it describes them by low structural probabilities.
“AlphaFold also does not generate ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins and regions, instead describing them by their low structural probabilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Premisenone givenAnchor atoms bind to the allosteric pocket without changing the conformation of the binding site, stabilizing ligand binding.
“The anchor atoms bind to the allosteric pocket, without changing the conformation of the binding site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAllosteric drugs can be constituted of anchor and driver atoms.
“We suggested that allosteric drugs can constitute of “anchors” and “drivers” atoms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAllosteric drugs have higher specificity and lower toxicity due to targeting nonconserved allosteric sites.
“Due to its higher specificity and consequently lower toxicity, which results from targeting nonconserved allosteric sites, allostery also increasingly features in allosteric drugs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOther AI-based strategies can assist directly in allosteric efforts, most effectively by accelerating and enhancing MD simulations.
“other AI-based strategies can assist directly in such efforts, most effectively via accelerating and enhancing MD simulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEffective allosteric sites require both stable interactions at the site and initiation of effective allosteric signals.
“the effectiveness of allosteric sites is determines by both stable interactions at the site, which is something that AI can help with, and initiation of effective allosteric signals, which would be more challenging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDriver atoms pull or push atoms in the protein pocket, initiating the allosteric signal that shifts the receptor population from the inactive to the active state.
“The binding of driver atoms “pulls” or “pushes” atoms in the protein pocket. This initiates the allosteric signal, which shifts the receptor population from the inactive to the active state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOrthosteric drugs block the active site; allosteric drugs alter the population of the active state through binding at a site far away.
“Orthosteric drugs block the active site; allosteric drugs alter the population of the active state of the protein, including the active site, through binding at a site far away.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [126] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDisordered proteins and regions are characterized by broad and heterogeneous ensembles with small differences in relative conformational stabilities and low barriers.
“Disordered proteins (regions) are characterized by broad and heterogeneous ensembles where the differences in the relative conformational stabilities are small, or even minor and the barriers are low.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 9 sources checked- cites [127] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [128] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [129] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [130] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [131] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [132] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [133] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [134] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [135] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI strategies can handle population shifts but will need to go beyond prediction of stabilizing interactions.
“AI strategies can but will need to go beyond prediction of stabilizing interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe folding paradigm stipulated that unfolded molecules spontaneously fold into the same shape, with the linear amino acid sequence specifying the folded native state.
“The folding paradigm stipulated that unfolded molecules will always spontaneously fold into the same shape; that is, the linear amino acid sequence specifies a protein’s folded native state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnfinsen's thermodynamic hypothesis states that the native structure of a protein is its thermodynamically most stable structure, determined only by its amino acid sequence and conditions, with kinetics playing no role.
“The landmark thermodynamic hypothesis of Christian Anfinsen and his colleagues140,141 stated that the native structure of a protein is its thermodynamically most stable structure, and it is determined only by its amino acid sequence and the conditions it is at, with kinetics playing no role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenUnlike quantum computing, for AI and data-driven computing, the technological innovations at the requisite scales are already at hand.
“Unlike quantum computing, in the case of AI and data-driven computing, the technological innovations at the requisite scales are already at hand.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins and regions interconvert, leading to low probabilities of AlphaFold reliably capturing the most favored conformation or the conformational distribution.
“The conformations interconvert, leading to low probabilities of AlphaFold’s reliably capturing those most favored, or the conformational distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAI-powered algorithms fed vast compiled data and enabled by massive compute power are propelling a revolution in computational biology.
“AI-powered algorithms, which are fed vast compiled data, and enabled by the emerging massive compute power are propelling a revolution in computational biology”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLevinthal argued that there is no need to search the vast folding space because the energy landscape is funnel-like and can guide sampling toward the biological conformational basin.
“Levinthal argued that there is no need to search this vast space since the energy landscape is funnel-like, rather than flat, and thus can guide sampling toward the biological conformational basin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenFor prediction algorithms sampling backbone states, the search space size grows exponentially with chain length, becoming an impossibility.
“For prediction algorithms’ sampling backbone states, the search space size grows exponentially with chain length, becoming an impossibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSingle sequence-based prediction considers hydrogen bonds, ion pairs, van der Waals attractions, and chiefly water-mediated hydrophobic interactions, with the hydrophobic effect driving protein folding.
“Single sequence-based prediction in solution considers forces related to hydrogen bonds, ion pairs, van der Waals attractions,139 and chiefly water-mediated hydrophobic interactions, with the hydrophobic effect the driving force for protein folding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [139] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLevinthal conceptualized the key problem facing protein folding and prediction algorithms as the vast time scales for a protein to search folding space and reach its most stable native state under biological conditions.
“Already early on, Cyrus Levinthal conceptualized the key problem facing the protein and the prediction algorithms:152 the vast time scales for the protein to search the folding space and reach its most stable native state under biological conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] Levinthal C., 1969
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA static description cannot capture function, including protein activation, high-affinity activator binding shifts, allosteric rescue mutations, allosteric drugs blocking the active site, and overcoming countering mutations.
“Yet, a static description cannot capture function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAlphaFold's remarkable success, with scores near 90 even in difficult CASP 2020 targets, was influenced by training on all PDB structures and on structures it predicted, and it uses structure and correlation data to predict contacting amino acid pairs and all pairwise distances.
“Its remarkable success (with scores of near 90 even in the difficult targets in the 2020 Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction, CASP) was influenced by its training not only on all the PDB structures but also on structures it predicted, and it uses the structure and correlation data to predict the pairs of amino acids that are in contact as well as all amino acid pairwise distances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAlphaFold models can serve as input to generate ensembles, for example by MD simulations, which if carried out at sufficiently long time scales, in parallel, should be able to produce them.
“However, the models it produces can serve as input to generate ensembles, for example by MD simulations, which, if carried out at sufficiently longtime scales, in parallel, it should be able to produce.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFrustration does not create new conformations; it alters the number of molecules populating a conformation.
“Frustration does not create new conformations; instead, it alters the number of molecules populating it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] Christensen N. G., 1989, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAlphaFold is not the first machine-learning model for protein structure prediction.
“AlphaFold is not the first in being a machine-learning model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlphaFold falls short in addressing which structural states exist for a given protein and what the population of each state is.
“Still, questions remain, such as which structural states exist for a give protein, and what is the population of each state. Addressing these questions is vital to relate protein structure to function. This is where AlphaFold falls short.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTo date, AlphaFold illuminates half of the dark human proteins.
“To date, AlphaFold illuminates half of the dark human proteins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSimulations can sample relevant states, enumerate possible state combinations in multistate models, and determine the population sizes for the states.
“Simulations can sample the relevant states, can enumerate possible state combinations (multistate models), and can determine the population sizes for the states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlphaFold predictions are unable to address allostery directly; only through sampling can this functional aim be accomplished.
“Despite its transformative power and vast broad impact, the AlphaFold predictions are unable to address it directly. It is only through their sampling that this functional aim can be accomplished.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiomolecules are dynamical objects that are always interconverting between structures with varying energies, and this is the origin of allosteric mechanisms.
“biomolecules are dynamical objects that are always interconverting between a variety of structures with varying energies,166 and that this is the origin of allosteric mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlphaFold ensured that distances between amino acids satisfy the triangle inequality, saving time at intermediate steps.
“It also ensured that the distances between the amino acids satisfy the triangle inequality, saving time at intermediate steps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [164] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTo understand biological regulation, structure should be linked to function through protein ensembles in terms of populations and relative energies, which is the foundation of allostery.
“To understand biological regulation, structure should be linked to function through protein ensembles in terms of populations and relative energies, which is the foundation of allostery”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone givenAlphaFold predictions, like homology modeling, are rigid; flexibility is implicitly captured by absence or low confidence levels for certain regions, as in intrinsically disordered proteins.
“The predictions that it yields, like those obtained by homology modeling, are rigid.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDeep learning methods can help MD simulations excel in efficiency and scales, with AI bridging deep learning technologies and simulations.
“Deep learning methods can help MD simulations excel in their efficiency and scales, with AI bridging between deep learning technologies and simulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA deep learning framework with mixed classical and machine learning potentials (TorchMD) has been developed for molecular simulations.
“In another example, a deep learning framework with mixed classical and machine learning potentials (TorchMD) has been developed for molecular simulations.188”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [188] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep learning involving variational autoencoders has been shown useful; the learned latent space has been employed to generate unsampled protein conformations, and simulations starting from these conformations accelerated sampling.
“The learned latent space in the variational autoencoders has been employed to generate unsampled protein conformations, and simulations starting from these conformations accelerated the sampling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [193] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMD simulations need to perform extensive sampling of the conformational space that requires long time scales.
“MD simulations need to perform extensive sampling of the conformational space that require long time scales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe conformational selection mechanism theorizes that the energy surface hosts a very large number of conformations, the best-fitting one is selected, with subsequent minor induced fit optimization largely by side chains.
“In contrast, the conformational selection mechanism167−169,185 theorizes that the energy surface hosts a very large number of conformations, and the one that fits best is selected, with subsequent minor induced fit optimization, largely by side chains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMachine learning has already been making a significant impact on the development of approximate methods for complex atomic systems.
“machine learning has already been making a significant impact on the development of approximate methods for complex atomic systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [186] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the induced fit mechanism, ligands bind to the single open protein structure and interaction with a rigid binding partner induces a conformational change.
“In an induced fit scenario, the ligands bind to the single “open” protein structure and the interaction between a protein and a rigid binding partner induces a conformational change in the protein.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [184] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile there is a single conformation that the active enzyme should adopt for productive catalysis, there are multiple ways to inactivate it and thus many inactive states.
“While there is a single conformation that the active enzyme should adopt for productive catalysis, there are multiple ways to inactivate it and thus many inactive states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI and deep learning are being developed and applied to experimental determination and prediction of macromolecular structures and to protein-protein interactions.
“AI and deep learning are also being developed and applied to experimental determination and prediction of macromolecular structures,198 as well as to PPIs.199,200”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMachine learning permits large-scale efficient and generalizable application and can address the complex dynamics of host-microbe relationships.
“Machine learning permits both the large-scale efficient and generalizable application and addressing the complex dynamics of such relationships that the machine learning algorithms can decipher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf the structures of the human or microbe are unavailable, AlphaFold can generate them.
“If the structures of the human or microbe are unable, AlphaFold can generate them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThrough MD simulations of models that AlphaFold produces, allostery can be accomplished as well.
“Nevertheless, through MD simulations of models that AlphaFold produces, this aim can be accomplished as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAllosteric mechanisms fall into the category of what AlphaFold cannot accomplish.
“Allosteric mechanisms fall into the latter category.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIn large-scale applications, AlphaFold can now be used to predict human host-microbial protein-protein interactions.
“In large scale applications, AlphaFold can now be used toward this aim.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEvaluation metrics for PPI prediction are unclear and PPI networks are sparse.
“Evaluation metrics are also unclear, the PPI networks are sparse, and more.66”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDeepMind's AlphaFold2 success in sequence-based protein structure prediction, the RoseTTAFold open-source counterpart, and the publicly available AlphaFold2 prediction of all human proteins are major steps that benefit the scientific community.
“DeepMind’s AlphaFold2 success in sequence-based protein structure prediction,4 as well as the RoseTTAFold70 open-source counterpart, and the publicly available AlphaFold2 prediction of all human proteins203 are major steps that benefit the scientific community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA paradigm-shifting machine learning method is needed to model protein dynamics.
“A paradigm-shifting machine learning method is needed to model protein dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEven though simulations would address the dynamics problem, at such scales, the cost is prohibitive.
“Still, however, even though simulations would address this dynamics problem, at such scales, the cost is prohibitive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationAlphaFold and its underlying deep learning innovations have opened up the next frontiers in protein science, including precision medicine.
“AlphaFold and its underlying deep learning innovations have opened up the next frontiers in protein science,164 including precision medicine.206”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
The authors state this as an assumption.
The crystal structure represents the minimum energy state, so the goodness of a predicted structure can be assessed by comparison with it.
“Assuming that the crystal structure represents the minimum energy state, the “goodness” of the predicted structure can then be assessed by comparison with it.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Human–microbiome protein–protein interactions play important roles in human health and disease.
“These interactions play important roles in human health and disease.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microbes, bacteria, and viruses impact human health.
“There is a rapid increase of data that microbes, bacteria, and viruses impact human health.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microbes can modulate human signaling and immune response by interacting with human proteins.
“They can modulate human signaling and immune response by interacting with the human proteins.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The interactions help pathogens elude and bypass immune defense, with pathogens hijacking host signaling.
“The interactions help the pathogens to elude and bypass the immune defense, with the pathogens hijacking host signaling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Data including structural details are scarce and large-scale experimental detection is challenging.
“Data, including structural details, are scarce and large-scale experimental detection is challenging.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Data relating to host–microbe PPIs with 3D structures are sparse, causing problems in training and evaluating computational methods.
“Data relating to host-microbe PPIs with 3D structures are sparse, thus facing a problem in training and evaluating the computational methods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a lack of gold standard test data set for PPI prediction.
“Additional problems involve lack of gold standard test data set.”
The paper relies on this without support.
To date, over 180,000 protein structures are available in the PDB database, open to all researchers worldwide.
“To date, over 180 000 protein structures are available, open to all researchers across the world in the PDB database.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Structures of pathogens are not within the PDB, and neither are many other structures essential to human health.
“Still, structures of pathogens are not within them, and neither are many others, which are essential to human health.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AlphaFold successfully solved the long-standing problem of protein folding, which had hindered progress in biology and medicine for decades.
“For instance, AlphaFold, an AI-powered algorithm, successfully solved the long-standing problem of protein folding, which had hindered progress in biology and medicine for decades.”
From Ethical Framework for Harnessing the Power of AI in Healthcare and Beyond (2024) · cites this paper as [144]
The potential applications of AI in healthcare are vast, including rapid diagnosis, personalized care, and reduction of unnecessary outpatient visits, resulting in significant cost savings.
“The potential applications of AI in healthcare are vast, including rapid diagnosis, personalized care, and reduction of unnecessary outpatient visits, resulting in significant cost savings [144].”
From Ethical Framework for Harnessing the Power of AI in Healthcare and Beyond (2024) · cites this paper as [144]
AlphaFold is a software platform that uses protein sequence data and AI to predict proteins' corresponding three-dimensional structures.
“It is a powerful algorithm that uses protein sequence data and AI to predict the proteins’ corresponding three-dimensional structures.”
From The role of AI in drug discovery: challenges, opportunities, and strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
AlphaFold2 in its by-default form was not optimized to sample conformations beyond the native structure.
“even though in its by-default form AlphaFold2 was not optimized to sample conformations beyond the native structure,265”
From Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [265]
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes
Waterhouse, A. M., Bertoni, M., Bienert, S., Studer, G., Tauriello, G., Gumienny, R., Heer, F. T., de Beer, T., Rempfer, C., Bordoli, L., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky427 · Cited by 13,005 · see citing works
Varadi, M., Anyango, S., Deshpande, M., Nair, S., Natassia, C., Yordanova, G., Yuan, D., Stroe, O., Wood, G., Laydon, A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · Cited by 7,850 · see citing works
Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains
Anfinsen, C. B. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · Cited by 7,096 · see citing works
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,542 · see citing works
Protein folding and misfolding
Dobson, C. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02261 · Cited by 4,791 · see citing works
Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations
Pushpakom, S., Iorio, F., Eyers, P. A., Escott, K. J., Hopper, S., Wells, A., Doig, A., Guilliams, T., Latimer, J., McNamee, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2018.168 · Cited by 4,718 · see citing works
The Energy Landscapes and Motions of Proteins
Frauenfelder, H., Sligar, S. G., & Wolynes, P. G. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1749933 · Cited by 3,250 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025 · see citing works
Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis
Bryngelson, J. D., Onuchic, J. N., Socci, N. D., & Wolynes, P. G. (1995) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340210302 · Cited by 2,648 · see citing works
The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine
He, J., Baxter, S. L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0 · Cited by 2,246 · see citing works
The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition
Boehr, D. D., Nussinov, R., & Wright, P. E. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.232 · Cited by 2,008 · see citing works
Self-citationLeaver-Fay (2011) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · Cited by 1,904 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., et al. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
The Protein-Folding Problem, 50 Years On
Dill, K. A., & MacCallum, J. L. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1219021 · Cited by 1,699 · see citing works
Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics
Baker, D., & Sali, A. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065659 · Cited by 1,587 · see citing works
Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations
Yang, J., Anishchenko, I., Park, H., Peng, Z., Ovchinnikov, S., & Baker, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · Cited by 1,421 · see citing works
A compendium of mutational cancer driver genes
Martínez-Jiménez, F., Muiños, F., Sentís, I., Deu-Pons, J., Reyes-Salazar, I., Arnedo-Pac, C., Mularoni, L., Pich, O., Bonet, J., Kranas, H., et al. (2020) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0290-x · Cited by 1,278 · see citing works
THE KINETICS OF FORMATION OF NATIVE RIBONUCLEASE DURING OXIDATION OF THE REDUCED POLYPEPTIDE CHAIN
Anfinsen, C. B., Haber, E., Sela, M., & White, F. H. (1961) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.47.9.1309 · Cited by 1,182 · see citing works
Dill, K. A., Ozkan, S. B., Shell, M. S., & Weikl, T. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · Cited by 1,163 · see citing works
Computer simulation of protein folding
Levitt, M., & Warshel, A. (1975) · Nature · doi:10.1038/253694a0 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
Next-Generation Machine Learning for Biological Networks
Camacho, D. M., Collins, K. M., Powers, R. K., Costello, J. C., & Collins, J. J. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.015 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Experimental and Theoretical Aspects of Protein Folding
Anfinsen, C. B., & Scheraga, H. A. (1975) · Advances in protein chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60413-1 · Cited by 973 · see citing works
Machine Learning for Molecular Simulation
Noé, F., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & Clementi, C. (2020) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052331 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
A primer on deep learning in genomics
Zou, J., Huss, M., Abid, A., Mohammadi, P., Torkamani, A., & Telenti, A. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0295-5 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Csermely, P., Palotai, R., & Nussinov, R. (2010) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2010.04.009 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvances in protein structure prediction and design
Kuhlman, B., & Bradley, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0163-x · Cited by 806 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in COVID-19 drug repurposing
Zhou, Y., Wang, F., Tang, J., Nussinov, R., & Cheng, F. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30192-8 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Self-citationFolding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts
Kumar, S., Ma, B., Tsai, C., Sinha, N., & Nussinov, R. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.1.10 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Self-citationFolding funnels and binding mechanisms
Ma, B., Kumar, S., Tsai, C.-J., & Nussinov, R. (1999) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/12.9.713 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Self-citationVAMPnets for deep learning of molecular kinetics
Mardt, A., Pasquali, L., Wu, H., & Noé, F. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02388-1 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Nucleation mechanisms in protein folding
Fersht, A. R. (1997) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80002-4 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
deepDR: a network-based deep learning approach toin silicodrug repositioning
Zeng, X., Zhu, S., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Nussinov, R., & Cheng, F. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz418 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Self-citation‘It will change everything’: DeepMind’s AI makes gigantic leap in solving protein structures
Callaway, E. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03348-4 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
PROTEIN COAGULATION AND ITS REVERSAL
Anson, M. L., & Mirsky, A. E. (1930) · Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.13.4.469 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Protein Allostery and Conformational Dynamics
Guo, J., & Zhou, H.-X. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00590 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Shea, J.-E., & Brooks III, C. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.52.1.499 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
VAMPnets for deep learning of molecular kinetics
Mardt, A., Pasquali, L., Wu, H., & Noé, F. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.17169/refubium-964 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction
Lazaridis, T. (2000) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00063-4 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Allostery in Its Many Disguises: From Theory to Applications
Wodak, S. J., Paci, E., Dokholyan, N. V., Berezovsky, I. N., Horovitz, A., Li, J., Hilser, V. J., Bahar, I., Karanicolas, J., Stock, G., et al. (2019) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2019.01.003 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Self-citationLim, J., Ryu, S., Park, K., Choe, Y. J., Ham, J., & Kim, W. Y. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00387 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Jarada, T. N., Rokne, J. G., & Alhajj, R. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00450-7 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
The nature of protein folding pathways
Englander, S. W., & Mayne, L. C. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1411798111 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Machine learning and complex biological data
Xu, C., & Jackson, S. A. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1689-0 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Folding and binding cascades: Shifts in energy landscapes
Tsai, C.-J., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.18.9970 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Self-citationWebb, S. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-02174-z · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Target identification among known drugs by deep learning from heterogeneous networks
Zeng, X., Zhu, S., Lu, W., Liu, Z., Huang, J., Zhou, Y., Fang, J., Huang, Y., Guo, H., Li, L., et al. (2020) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c9sc04336e · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Self-citationDriver and Passenger Mutations in Cancer
Pon, J. R., & Marra, M. A. (2014) · Annual Review of Pathology Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040312 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Structural basis for understanding oncogenic p53 mutations and designing rescue drugs
Joerger, A. C., Ang, H. C., & Fersht, A. R. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607286103 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Protein Folding Theory: From Lattice to All-Atom Models
Mirny, L., & Shakhnovich, E. (2001) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.361 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Reweighted autoencoded variational Bayes for enhanced sampling (RAVE)
Ribeiro, J. M. L., Collado, P. B., Wang, Y., & Tiwary, P. (2018) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5025487 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Can AlphaFold2 predict the impact of missense mutations on structure?
Buel, G. R., & Walters, K. J. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-021-00714-2 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
AlQuraishi, M. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz422 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Ferreiro, D. U., Komives, E. A., & Wolynes, P. G. (2014) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583514000092 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Allostery: An Overview of Its History, Concepts, Methods, and Applications
Liu, J., & Nussinov, R. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004966 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Self-citationDrug Repurposing for Rare Diseases
Roessler, H. I., Knoers, N. V. A. M., van Haelst, M. M., & van Haaften, G. W. (2021) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2021.01.003 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
The Levinthal paradox: yesterday and today
Karplus, M. (1997) · Folding and Design · doi:10.1016/s1359-0278(97)00067-9 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Machine learning in protein structure prediction
AlQuraishi, M. (2021) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.04.005 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
TorchMD: A Deep Learning Framework for Molecular Simulations
Doerr, S., Majewski, M., Pérez, A., Krämer, A., Clementi, C., Noe, F., Giorgino, T., & De Fabritiis, G. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01343 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Deep Learning in Protein Structural Modeling and Design
Gao, W., Mahajan, S. P., Sulam, J., & Gray, J. J. (2020) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100142 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Side-chain Interactions Governing the Pairing of Half-cystine Residues in Ribonuclease
Haber, E., & Anfinsen, C. B. (1962) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)73945-3 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Intrinsically disordered proteins play diverse roles in cell signaling
Bondos, S. E., Dunker, A. K., & Uversky, V. N. (2022) · Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1186/s12964-022-00821-7 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Abyzov, A., Blackledge, M., & Zweckstetter, M. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00774 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Allostery without a conformational change? Revisiting the paradigm
Nussinov, R., & Tsai, C.-J. (2015) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.11.005 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping allosteric communications within individual proteins
Wang, J., Jain, A., McDonald, L. R., Gambogi, C., Lee, A. L., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17618-2 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Impact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions
Saldaño, T., Escobedo, N., Marchetti, J., Zea, D. J., Mac Donagh, J., Velez Rueda, A. J., Gonik, E., Melani, A. G., Novomisky Nechcoff, J., Salas, M. N., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.27.466189 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Impact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions
Saldaño, T., Escobedo, N., Marchetti, J., Zea, D. J., Mac Donagh, J., Velez Rueda, A. J., Gonik, E., García Melani, A., Novomisky Nechcoff, J., Salas, M. N., et al. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac202 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
The Role of Conformational Dynamics and Allostery in Modulating Protein Evolution
Campitelli, P., Modi, T., Kumar, S., & Ozkan, S. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115517 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
DeepMicro: Deep representation learning for disease prediction based on microbiome data
Oh, M., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63159-5 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
AI revolutions in biology: The joys and perils of AlphaFold
Perrakis, A., & Sixma, T. K. (2021) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202154046 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Machine learning for protein folding and dynamics
Noé, F., Fabritiis, G. D., & Clementi, C. (2019) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.005 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
COAST: COntrollable Arbitrary-Sampling NeTwork for Compressive Sensing
You, D., Zhang, J., Xie, J., Chen, B., & Ma, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2021.3091834 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Neural networks to learn protein sequence–function relationships from deep mutational scanning data
Gelman, S., Fahlberg, S. A., Heinzelman, P., Romero, P. A., & Gitter, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2104878118 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Mössbauer Spectroscopy of Biological Systems
Münck, E., & Bominaar, E. L. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17952-5_13 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Drug repurposing: Misconceptions, challenges, and opportunities for academic researchers
Begley, C. G., Ashton, M. R., Baell, J. B., Bettess, M. D., Brown, M. P., Carter, B. A., Charman, W. N., Davis, C., Fisher, S., Frazer, I. H., et al. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abd5524 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Fuzziness and Frustration in the Energy Landscape of Protein Folding, Function, and Assembly
Gianni, S., Freiberger, M. I., Jemth, P., Ferreiro, D. U., Wolynes, P. G., & Fuxreiter, M. (2021) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00813 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Bai, Q., Liu, S., Tian, Y., Xu, T., Banegas‐Luna, A. J., Pérez‐Sánchez, H., Huang, J., Liu, H., & Yao, X. (2022) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1581 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Principles of Allosteric Interactions in Cell Signaling
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C.-J., & Liu, J. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja510028c · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationAllosteric sites: remote control in regulation of protein activity
Guarnera, E., & Berezovsky, I. N. (2015) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2015.10.004 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Zeng, X., Zhu, S., Hou, Y., Zhang, P., Li, L., Li, J., Huang, L. F., Lewis, S. J., Nussinov, R., & Cheng, F. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa010 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationStructural insights into host GTPase isoform selection by a family of bacterial GEF mimics
Huang, Z., Sutton, S. E., Wallenfang, A. J., Orchard, R. C., Wu, X., Feng, Y., Chai, J., & Alto, N. M. (2009) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1647 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Sahoo, B. M., Kumar, B. V. V. R., Sruti, J., Mahapatra, M. K., Banik, B. K., & Borah, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.628144 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Learning context-aware structural representations to predict antigen and antibody binding interfaces
Pittala, S., & Bailey‐Kellogg, C. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa263 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Structural basis for the reversible activation of a Rho protein by the bacterial toxin SopE
Buchwald, G., Friebel, A., Galán, J. E., Hardt, W., Wittinghofer, A., & Scheffzek, K. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf329 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Fortelny, N., & Bock, C. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02100-5 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Learning spatial structures of proteins improves protein–protein interaction prediction
Song, B., Luo, X., Luo, X., Liu, Y., Niu, Z., & Zeng, X. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab558 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationTargeting intrinsically disordered proteins at the edge of chaos
Ruan, H., Sun, Q., Zhang, W., Liu, Y., & Lai, L. (2019) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.017 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationThe structural coverage of the human proteome before and after AlphaFold
Porta-Pardo, E., Ruiz-Serra, V., Valentini, S., & Valencia, A. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009818 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Nussinov, R., Jang, H., Tsai, C., & Cheng, F. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006658 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationBuilding a synthetic mechanosensitive signaling pathway in compartmentalized artificial cells
Hindley, J. W., Zheleva, D. G., Elani, Y., Charalambous, K., Barter, L. M. C., Booth, P. J., Bevan, C. L., Law, R. V., & Ces, O. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1903500116 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Deep learning techniques have significantly impacted protein structure prediction and protein design
Pearce, R., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2021.01.007 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Learning for Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review From a Deep Learning Perspective
Zhang, S., Bamakan, S. M. H., Qu, Q., & Li, S. (2019) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2018.2864254 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Activation of Rho GTPases by DOCK Exchange Factors Is Mediated by a Nucleotide Sensor
Yang, J., Zhang, Z., Roe, S. M., Marshall, C. J., & Barford, D. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174468 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Unraveling structural mechanisms of allosteric drug action
Nussinov, R., & Tsai, C.-J. (2014) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2014.03.006 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationAllosteric drugs and mutations: chances, challenges, and necessity
Guarnera, E., & Berezovsky, I. N. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2020.01.010 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The Design of Covalent Allosteric Drugs
Nussinov, R., & Tsai, C.-J. (2015) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124401 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationMoreno‐Indias, I., Lahti, L., Nedyalkova, M., Elbere, I., Roshchupkin, G. V., Adilović, M., Aydemir, Ö., Bakır-Güngör, B., Pau, E. C. D. S., D’Elia, D., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.635781 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks
Wang, X., Terashi, G., Christoffer, C. W., Zhu, M., & Kihara, D. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz870 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Tsai, S.-T., Kuo, E.-J., & Tiwary, P. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18959-8 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
A second molecular biology revolution? The energy landscapes of biomolecular function
Nussinov, R., & Wolynes, P. G. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c4cp90027h · Cited by 104 · cited 1× · see citing works
“166,175 Static descriptions were the norm for decades.”
BackgroundSelf-citationStrodel, B. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167182 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
The accuracy of protein structures in solution determined by AlphaFold and NMR
Fowler, N. J., & Williamson, M. P. (2022) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2022.04.005 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Protein interaction interface region prediction by geometric deep learning
Dai, B., & Bailey‐Kellogg, C. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab154 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Liu, J., & Nussinov, R. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707401105 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationHarnessing endophenotypes and network medicine for Alzheimer's drug repurposing
Fang, J., Pieper, A. A., Nussinov, R., Lee, G., Bekris, L. M., Leverenz, J. B., Cummings, J. L., & Cheng, F. (2020) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21709 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure-based prediction of protein allostery
Greener, J. G., & Sternberg, M. J. (2018) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.002 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Binding without folding – the biomolecular function of disordered polyelectrolyte complexes
Schuler, B., Borgia, A., Borgia, M. B., Heidarsson, P. O., Holmstrom, E. D., Nettels, D., & Sottini, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.006 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Protein‐Structure Prediction by Recombination of Fragments
Bujnicki, J. M. (2005) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.200500235 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Deep clustering of protein folding simulations
Bhowmik, D., Gao, S. B., Young, M. T., & Ramanathan, A. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2507-5 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
All-Atom Ab Initio Folding of a Diverse Set of Proteins
Yang, J. S., Chen, W. W., Skolnick, J., & Shakhnovich, E. I. (2007) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2006.11.010 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
‘Latent drivers’ expand the cancer mutational landscape
Nussinov, R., & Tsai, C. (2015) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2015.01.004 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationPacking Is a Key Selection Factor in the Evolution of Protein Hydrophobic Cores
Chen, J., & Stites, W. E. (2001) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi011776v · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Fuzziness enables context dependence of protein interactions
Miskei, M., Gregus, A., Sharma, R., Duro, N., Zsolyomi, F., & Fuxreiter, M. (2017) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12762 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Finding driver mutations in cancer: Elucidating the role of background mutational processes
Brown, A. L., Li, M., Goncearenco, A., & Panchenko, A. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006981 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Current structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding
Outeiral, C., Nissley, D. A., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab881 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
AlphaFold illuminates half of the dark human proteins
Binder, J. L., Berendzen, J., Stevens, A. O., He, Y., Wang, J., Dokholyan, N. V., & Oprea, T. I. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102372 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
How multisite phosphorylation impacts the conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins
Jin, F., & Gräter, F. (2021) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008939 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Verkhivker, G. M., Agajanian, S., Hu, G., & Tao, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.00136 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
General overview on structure prediction of twilight-zone proteins
Khor, B. Y., Tye, G. J., Lim, T. S., & Choong, Y. S. (2015) · Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling · doi:10.1186/s12976-015-0014-1 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Deng, H., Jia, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s021797921840009x · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Di Cera, E. (2020) · Biophysics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0020997 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Network biomarkers reveal dysfunctional gene regulations during disease progression
Zeng, T., Sun, S., Wang, Y., Zhu, H., & Chen, L. (2013) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.12536 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Protein structure prediction by <i>AlphaFold</i> 2: are attention and symmetries all you need?
Bouatta, N., Sorger, P., & AlQuraishi, M. (2021) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798321007531 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Protein design via deep learning
Ding, W., Nakai, K., & Gong, H. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac102 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Allostery: Allosteric Cancer Drivers and Innovative Allosteric Drugs
Nussinov, R., Zhang, M., Maloney, R., Liu, Y., Tsai, C.-J., & Jang, H. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167569 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence for Biology
Hassoun, S., Jefferson, F., Shi, X., Stucky, B., Wang, J., & Rosa, E. (2022) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icab188 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Real-time structure search and structure classification for AlphaFold protein models
Aderinwale, T., Bharadwaj, V., Christoffer, C., Terashi, G., Zhang, Z., Jahandideh, R., Kagaya, Y., & Kihara, D. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03261-8 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Client binding shifts the populations of dynamic Hsp90 conformations through an allosteric network
Lopez, A., Dahiya, V., Delhommel, F., Freiburger, L., Stehle, R., Asami, S., Rutz, D., Blair, L., Buchner, J., & Sattler, M. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl7295 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Ramanathan, A., Ma, H., Parvatikar, A., & Chennubhotla, C. S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2020.12.001 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Predicting Anticancer Drug Response With Deep Learning Constrained by Signaling Pathways
Zhang, H., Chen, Y., & Li, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2021.639349 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Filteau, M., Hamel, V., Pouliot, M., Gagnon‐Arsenault, I., Dubé, A. K., & Landry, C. R. (2015) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20156444 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Using What We Already Have: Uncovering New Drug Repurposing Strategies in Existing Omics Data
Pulley, J. M., Rhoads, J. P., Jerome, R. N., Challa, A. P., Erreger, K., Joly, M. M., Lavieri, R. R., Perry, K. E., Zaleski, N. M., Shirey-Rice, J. K., et al. (2019) · The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010919-023537 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Precision medicine review: rare driver mutations and their biophysical classification
Nussinov, R., Jang, H., Tsai, C., & Cheng, F. (2019) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-018-0496-2 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence guided conformational mining of intrinsically disordered proteins
Gupta, A., Dey, S., Hicks, A., & Zhou, H.-X. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03562-y · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Allosteric Conformational Barcodes Direct Signaling in the Cell
Nussinov, R., Ma, B., Tsai, C.-J., & Csermely, P. (2013) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2013.06.002 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationOncoviruses Can Drive Cancer by Rewiring Signaling Pathways Through Interface Mimicry
Guven‐Maiorov, E., Tsai, C., & Nussinov, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.01236 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationA new precision medicine initiative at the dawn of exascale computing
Nussinov, R., Jang, H., Nir, G., Tsai, C., & Cheng, F. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00420-3 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationStructural host-microbiota interaction networks
Guven‐Maiorov, E., Tsai, C., & Nussinov, R. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005579 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationB-Raf autoinhibition in the presence and absence of 14-3-3
Zhang, M., Jang, H., Li, Z., Sacks, D. B., & Nussinov, R. (2021) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2021.02.005 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationSantambrogio, C., Natalello, A., Brocca, S., Ponzini, E., & Grandori, R. (2019) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201800060 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Integrative Structure Modeling: Overview and Assessment
Braitbard, M., Schneidman‐Duhovny, D., & Kalisman, N. (2019) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111429 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Explore Protein Conformational Space With Variational Autoencoder
Tian, H., Jiang, X., Trozzi, F., Xiao, S., Larson, E. C., & Tao, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.781635 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
3DLigandSite: structure-based prediction of protein–ligand binding sites
McGreig, J. E., Uri, H., Antczak, M., Sternberg, M. J. E., Michaelis, M., & Wass, M. N. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac250 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Does Ras Activate Raf and PI3K Allosterically?
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C., & Jang, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.01231 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationEnergy‐based graph convolutional networks for scoring protein docking models
Cao, Y., & Shen, Y. (2020) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25888 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Exploring the Allosteric Territory of Protein Function
Tee, W.-V., Tan, Z. W., Lee, K., Guarnera, E., & Berezovsky, I. N. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c00540 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Deep learning in prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins
Zhao, B., & Kurgan, L. (2022) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.03.003 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Why Are Some Driver Mutations Rare?
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C., & Jang, H. (2019) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2019.10.003 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationTargeting protein-protein interaction interfaces in COVID-19 drug discovery
Chang, C., Lin, S., Satange, R., Lin, S., Sun, S.-C., Wu, H., Kehn‐Hall, K., & Hou, M. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.003 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Allostery, and how to define and measure signal transduction
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C., & Jang, H. (2022) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106766 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationData-driven reverse engineering of signaling pathways using ensembles of dynamic models
Henriques, D., Villaverde, A. F., Rocha, M., Saez-Rodriguez, J., & Banga, J. R. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005379 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Ramalli, S. G., Miles, A. J., Janes, R. W., & Wallace, B. A. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167441 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Li, S., Wu, S., Wang, L., Li, F., Jiang, H., & Bai, F. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102344 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Goncearenco, A., Li, M., Simonetti, F. L., Shoemaker, B. A., & Panchenko, A. R. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7201-2_15 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Deep template-based protein structure prediction
Wu, F., & Xu, J. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008954 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Allosteric conformational ensembles have unlimited capacity for integrating information
Biddle, J. W., Martinez-Corral, R., Wong, F., & Gunawardena, J. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.65498 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence approaches to human-microbiome protein–protein interactions
Lim, H., Cankara, F., Tsai, C.-J., Keskin, O., Nussinov, R., & Gursoy, A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102328 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationGuven‐Maiorov, E., Hakouz, A., Valjevac, S., Keskin, Ö., Tsai, C., Gürsoy, A., & Nussinov, R. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2020.01.025 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationCooperativity between the orthosteric and allosteric ligand binding sites of RORγt
de Vries, R. M. J. M., Meijer, F. A., Doveston, R. G., Leijten-van de Gevel, I. A., & Brunsveld, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2021287118 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Membranome 3.0: Database of single‐pass membrane proteins with AlphaFold models
Lomize, A. L., Schnitzer, K. A., Todd, S. C., Cherepanov, S., Outeiral, C., Deane, C. M., & Pogozheva, I. D. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4318 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Gopal, S. M., Wingbermühle, S., Schnatwinkel, J., Juber, S., Herrmann, C., & Schäfer, L. V. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c08702 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Protein p <i>K</i> <sub>a</sub> Prediction by Tree-Based Machine Learning
Chen, A. Y., Lee, J., Damjanovic, A., & Brooks, B. R. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01257 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Bar, D. Z., Arlt, M. F., Brazier, J. F., Norris, W. E., Campbell, S. E., Chines, P. S., Larrieu, D., Jackson, S. P., Collins, F. S., Glover, T. W., et al. (2016) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104295 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Autoinhibition can identify rare driver mutations and advise pharmacology
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C., & Jang, H. (2019) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.201901341r · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationAI-Driver: an ensemble method for identifying driver mutations in personal cancer genomes
Wang, H., Wang, T., Zhao, X., Wu, H., You, M., Sun, Z. S., & Mao, F. (2020) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaa084 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Uncovering an allosteric mode of action for a selective inhibitor of human Bloom syndrome protein
Chen, X., Ali, Y. I., Fisher, C. E., Arribas-Bosacoma, R., Rajasekaran, M. B., Williams, G., Walker, S., Booth, J. R., Hudson, J. J., Roe, S. M., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.65339 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Feng, J., Zhang, H., & Li, F. (2021) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03850-6 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Smith, Z., Ravindra, P., Wang, Y., Cooley, R., & Tiwary, P. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c03985 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Machine learning in the analysis of biomolecular simulations
Kaptan, S., & Vattulainen, I. (2022) · Advances in Physics: X · doi:10.1080/23746149.2021.2006080 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Next Generation Protein Structure Predictions and Genetic Variant Interpretation
Diwan, G. D., Gonzalez-Sanchez, J. C., Apic, G., & Russell, R. B. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167180 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Guven‐Maiorov, E., Tsai, C., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2017) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.10.023 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationGreener, J. G., & Jones, D. T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256990 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Sebastiano, M. R., Ermondi, G., Hadano, S., & Caron, G. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.12.018 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Deep learning methods for 3D structural proteome and interactome modeling
Lee, D., Xiong, D., Wierbowski, S., Li, L., Liang, S., & Yu, H. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102329 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Tee, W.-V., Tan, Z. W., Guarnera, E., & Berezovsky, I. N. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167577 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Simpkin, A. J., Thomas, J. M. H., Keegan, R. M., & Rigden, D. J. (2022) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798322003576 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Palukuri, M. V., & Marcotte, E. M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262056 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Rethinking Protein Drug Design with Highly Accurate Structure Prediction of Anti-CRISPR Proteins
Park, H.-M., Park, Y., Vankerschaver, J., Messem, A. V., Neve, W. D., & Shim, H. (2022) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph15030310 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Intrinsic protein disorder and protein modifications in the processing of biological signals
Phillips, A. H., & Kriwacki, R. W. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2019.09.003 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Interface-Based Structural Prediction of Novel Host-Pathogen Interactions
Guven‐Maiorov, E., Tsai, C., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8736-8_18 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationDynamic Protein Allosteric Regulation and Disease
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C.-J., & Jang, H. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8719-7_2 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationMartin, W., Sheynkman, G., Lightstone, F. C., Nussinov, R., & Cheng, F. (2021) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2021.09.001 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationA computational study of RNA binding and specificity in the tandem zinc finger domain of TIS11d
Morgan, B. R., & Massi, F. (2010) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.401 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Developments in integrative modeling with dynamical interfaces
Ozdemir, E. S., Nussinov, R., Gursoy, A., & Keskin, O. (2019) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2018.10.007 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationWeingand-Ziadé, A., Ribes, F., Renault, F., & Masson, P. (2001) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/0264-6021:3560487 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Protein Homology Detection Propelled by Inter-Residue Interaction Map Threading
Bhattacharya, S., Roche, R., Shuvo, M. H., & Bhattacharya, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.643752 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Thorn, A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102368 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
WEINGAND-ZIADE, A., RIBES, F., RENAULT, F., & MASSON, P. (2001) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3560487 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Resolves Kinetic Pathways of Magnesium Binding to RNA
Neumann, J., & Schwierz, N. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00752 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Grand Challenges for Artificial Intelligence in Molecular Medicine
Emmert‐Streib, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmmed.2021.734659 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A3D database: structure-based predictions of protein aggregation for the human proteome
Badaczewska-Dawid, A. E., Garcia-Pardo, J., Kuriata, A., Pujols, J., Ventura, S., & Kmiecik, S. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac215 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Therapeutic Targeting the Allosteric Cysteinome of RAS and Kinase Families
Li, L., Meyer, C., Zhou, Z.-W., Elmezayen, A., & Westover, K. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167626 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Mingione, V. R., Foda, Z. H., Paung, Y., Philipose, H., Rangwala, A. M., Shan, Y., & Seeliger, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167628 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
May, M. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0411-405 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Predicting homologous signaling pathways using machine learning
Bostan, B., Greiner, R., Szafron, D., & Lu, P. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp532 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A framework towards data analytics on host–pathogen protein–protein interactions
Chen, H., Shen, J., Wang, L., & Song, J. (2020) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-01715-7 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Deep learning opens up protein science’s next frontiers
Miller, J. L. (2021) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/pt.3.4850 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1101/2021.1111.1121.469457 · DOI
- Christensen N. G., 1989, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 109, 1770
- Bosshard B., 1983, Morphol Med., 3, 71
- 10.1101/2020.1107.1128.225490 · DOI
- Ingraham, J.; Riesselman, A.; Sander, C.; Marks, D. Learning protein structure with a differentiable simulator. https://openreview.net/forum?id=Byg3y3C9Km (accessed Sep 27, 2019).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of AI in drug discovery: challenges, opportunities, and strategies
Blanco-González, A., Cabezón, A., Seco-González, A., Conde-Torres, D., Antelo-Riveiro, P., Piñeiro, Á., & Garcia-Fandino, R. (2023) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph16060891 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
AlphaFold2 and its applications in the fields of biology and medicine
Yang, Z., Zeng, X., Zhao, Y. C., & Chen, R. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01381-z · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Modeling conformational states of proteins with AlphaFold
Sala, D., Engelberger, F., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102645 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Tribulations and future opportunities for artificial intelligence in precision medicine
Carini, C., & Seyhan, A. A. (2024) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-024-05067-0 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
AlphaFold predictions of fold-switched conformations are driven by structure memorization
Chakravarty, D., Schafer, J. W., Chen, E. A., Thole, J. F., Ronish, L. A., Lee, M., & Porter, L. L. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51801-z · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Ethical Framework for Harnessing the Power of AI in Healthcare and Beyond
Nasir, S., Khan, R. A., & Bai, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3369912 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Predicting equilibrium distributions for molecular systems with deep learning
Zheng, S., He, J., Liu, C., Shi, Y., Lu, Z., Feng, W., Ju, F., Wang, J., Zhu, J., Min, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00837-3 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Protein conformational ensembles in function: roles and mechanisms
Nussinov, R., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., & Jang, H. (2023) · RSC Chemical Biology · doi:10.1039/d3cb00114h · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationAlphaFold, allosteric, and orthosteric drug discovery: Ways forward
Nussinov, R., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Jang, H. (2023) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103551 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationProtein folds vs. protein folding: Differing questions, different challenges
Chen, S., Hassan, M., Jernigan, R. L., Jia, K., Kihara, D., Kloczkowski, A., Kotelnikov, S., Kozakov, D., Liang, J., Liwo, A., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2214423119 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationReview of AlphaFold 3: Transformative Advances in Drug Design and Therapeutics
Desai, D., Kantliwala, S. V., Vybhavi, J., Ravi, R., Patel, H., & Patel, J. S. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.63646 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Structure‐Based Drug Discovery with Deep Learning**
Özçelik, R., van Tilborg, D., Jiménez-Luna, J., & Grisoni, F. (2023) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202200776 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence
Duran-Frigola, M., Cigler, M., & Winter, G. E. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c11098 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Zhao, K., Xia, Y., Zhang, F., Zhou, X., Li, S. Z., & Zhang, G. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04605-8 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Husnain, A., Rasool, S., Saeed, A., & Hussain, H. K. (2023) · International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts · doi:10.47709/ijmdsa.v2i2.2897 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The role of artificial intelligence in drug screening, drug design, and clinical trials
Wu, Y., Ma, L., Li, X., Yang, J., Rao, X., Hu, Y., Xi, J., Tao, L., Wang, J., Du, L., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1459954 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
AI'S Healing Touch: Examining Machine Learning's Transformative Effects On Healthcare
Husnain, A., Rasool, S., Saeed, A., Gill, A. Y., & Hussain, H. K. (2023) · Journal Of World Science · doi:10.58344/jws.v2i10.448 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Psychrophilic enzymes: strategies for cold-adaptation
Collins, T., & Feller, G. (2023) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20220193 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Emerging Pharmacotherapeutic Strategies to Overcome Undruggable Proteins in Cancer
Lu, Y., Yang, Y., Zhu, G., Zeng, H., Fan, Y., Guo, F., Xu, D., Wang, B., Chen, D., & Ge, G. (2023) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.83026 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
AI-driven bioactive peptide discovery of next-generation metabolic biotherapeutics
Hamadou, M., & Mune, M. A. M. (2025) · Applied Food Research · doi:10.1016/j.afres.2025.101291 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Agajanian, S., Alshahrani, M., Bai, F., Tao, P., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01634 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Strategy toward Kinase-Selective Drug Discovery
Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Jang, H., & Nussinov, R. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01171 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationDecoding allosteric landscapes: computational methodologies for enzyme modulation and drug discovery
Zhu, R., Wu, C., Zha, J., Lu, S., & Zhang, J. (2025) · RSC Chemical Biology · doi:10.1039/d4cb00282b · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Breaking the conformational ensemble barrier: Ensemble structure modeling challenges in CASP15
Kryshtafovych, A., Montelione, G., Rigden, D., Mesdaghi, S., Karaca, E., & Moult, J. (2023) · doi:10.22541/au.169199504.48580490/v1 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Breaking the conformational ensemble barrier: Ensemble structure modeling challenges in CASP15
Kryshtafovych, A., Montelione, G. T., Rigden, D. J., Mesdaghi, S., Karaca, E., & Moult, J. (2023) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26584 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Nussinov, R. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169044 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationCell phenotypes can be predicted from propensities of protein conformations
Nussinov, R., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., & Jang, H. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102722 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationAbid, F., Khan, K., Badshah, Y., Ashraf, N. M., Shabbir, M., Hamid, A., Afsar, T., Almajwal, A. M., & Razak, S. (2023) · Cancer Cell International · doi:10.1186/s12935-023-02965-z · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The value of protein allostery in rational anticancer drug design: an update
Nussinov, R., & Jang, H. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2024.2384467 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationȘerban, M., Toader, C., & Covache-Busuioc, R.-A. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26157364 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Li, B., & Ming, D. (2024) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-024-05820-8 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Representing structures of the multiple conformational states of proteins
Ramelot, T. A., Tejero, R., & Montelione, G. T. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102703 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Rout, A. K., Dehury, B., Parida, S. N., Rout, S. S., Jena, R., Kaushik, N., Kaushik, N. K., Pradhan, S. K., Sahoo, C. R., Singh, A. K., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132030 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Hatos, A., Teixeira, J. M. C., Barrera-Vilarmau, S., Horváth, A., Tosatto, S. C. E., Vendruscolo, M., & Fuxreiter, M. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad214 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Automated benchmarking of combined protein structure and ligand conformation prediction
Leemann, M., Sagasta, A., Eberhardt, J., Schwede, T. F., Robin, X., & Durairaj, J. (2023) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26605 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Protein structure and dynamics in the era of integrative structural biology
Grandori, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Biophysics · doi:10.3389/frbis.2023.1219843 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Raisinghani, N., Alshahrani, M., Gupta, G., Tian, H., Xiao, S., Tao, P., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00222 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Structure-Based Function and Regulation of NCX Variants: Updates and Challenges
Khananshvili, D. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24010061 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
What can AlphaFold do for antimicrobial amyloids?
Ragonis‐Bachar, P., Axel, G., Blau, S., Ben‐Tal, N., Kolodny, R., & Landau, M. (2023) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26618 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Allosteric crosstalk in modular proteins: Function fine-tuning and drug design
Abhishek, S., Deeksha, W., Nethravathi, K. R., Davari, M. D., & Rajakumara, E. (2023) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.013 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Kim, S., Mollaei, P., Antony, A., Magar, R., & Farimani, A. B. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01706 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Drug Discovery and Development
Parvathaneni, M., Awol, A. K., Kumari, M., Lan, K., & Lingam, M. (2023) · Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics · doi:10.22270/jddt.v13i1.5867 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
AlphaFold2 Update and Perspectives
Tourlet, S., Radjasandirane, R., Diharce, J., & de Brevern, A. G. (2023) · BioMedInformatics · doi:10.3390/biomedinformatics3020025 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Aziz, T., Shabbir, M. A., Sarwar, A., Yang, Z., Lin, L., Al‐Megrin, W. A. I., Shami, A., Alwethaynani, M. S., Alhhazmi, A. A., Al‐Asmari, F., et al. (2025) · Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1007/s12013-025-01853-9 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Yakoubi, S. (2025) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2025.105241 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Huang, J., Tang, G. Q., Liu, N., Li, X., & Lu, S. (2025) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104466 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Intrinsic disorder and flexibility in proteins: a challenge for structural biology and drug design
Zanotti, G. (2023) · Crystallography Reviews · doi:10.1080/0889311x.2023.2208518 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Yadav, M. K., Dahiya, V., Tripathi, M. K., Chaturvedi, N., Rashmi, M., Ghosh, A., & Raj, V. S. (2024) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.177103 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Fang, C., Zhou, P., Zhang, X., He, Y., & Yang, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1609827 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Verkhivker, G. M., Alshahrani, M., Gupta, G., Xiao, S., & Tao, P. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24097747 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Computing the Volume, Surface Area, Mean, and Gaussian Curvatures of Molecules and Their Derivatives
Koehl, P., Akopyan, A. V., & Edelsbrunner, H. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01346 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
AI's role in pharmaceuticals: Assisting drug design from protein interactions to drug development
Bechelli, S., & Delhommelle, J. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.aichem.2023.100038 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
PRUNE1 and NME/NDPK family proteins influence energy metabolism and signaling in cancer metastases
Ferrucci, V., Lomada, S., Wieland, T., & Zollo, M. (2024) · Cancer Metastasis Review · doi:10.1007/s10555-023-10165-4 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
NMR tools to detect protein allostery
Gampp, O., Kadavath, H., & Riek, R. (2024) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102792 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Kamboukos, A., Todorova, N., & Yarovsky, I. (2025) · Small Science · doi:10.1002/smsc.202400505 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Strategies Used for the Discovery of New Microbial Metabolites with Antibiotic Activity
Dasí-Delgado, P., Andreu, C., & del Olmo, M. (2025) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules30132868 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The Evolving Landscape of Protein Allostery: From Computational and Experimental Perspectives
Ekambaram, S., Arakelov, G., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169060 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Unlocking the secrets: Structure-function dynamics of plant proteins
Haider, T., Akram, W., Joshi, R., Vishwakarma, M., Saraf, S., Soni, V., & Garud, N. (2025) · Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.114791 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Allostery Illuminated: Harnessing AI and Machine Learning for Drug Discovery
Blanco, M.-J., Buskes, M. J., Govindaraj, R. G., Ipsaro, J. J., Prescott-Roy, J., & Padyana, A. K. (2024) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.4c00260 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Statistical Thermodynamics of the Protein Ensemble: Mediating Function and Evolution
Hilser, V. J., Wrabl, J. O., Millard, C. E., Schmitz, A., Brantley, S. J., Pearce, M., Rehfus, J., Russo, M. M., & Voortman‐Sheetz, K. (2025) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-061824-104900 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Role of artificial intelligence in advancing immunology
Alanazi, H. H. (2025) · Immunologic Research · doi:10.1007/s12026-025-09632-7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Vidiyala, N., Sunkishala, P., Parupathi, P. R., & Nyavanandi, D. (2025) · AAPS PharmSciTech · doi:10.1208/s12249-025-03134-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Mukhopadhyay, S., Sinha, K., & Chakrabarty, S. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169382 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Molecular Docking as a Key Driver of Biocontrol for Agri-Food Security
Íñiguez-Luna, M. I., Cadena-Zamudio, J. D., Ramírez-Mosqueda, M. A., Aguirre‐Noyola, J. L., Cadena-Zamudio, D. A., Cadena-Íñiguez, J., & Armenta-Medina, A. (2025) · BioTech · doi:10.3390/biotech14040080 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Eskandar, K. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00872-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
State-of-the-art and novel approaches to mild solubilization of inclusion bodies
Klausser, R., Kopp, J., Brichtová, E., Gisperg, F., Elshazly, M. K., & Oliver Spadiut, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1249196 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Molecular Docking of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Challenges and Strategies
Patel, K. N., Chavda, D., & Manna, M. (2024) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_11 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Raisinghani, N., Alshahrani, M., Gupta, G., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms251810082 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Delkhosh, A. S., Hadadianpour, E., Islam, M. M., & Georgieva, E. R. (2024) · Journal of Structural Biology X · doi:10.1016/j.yjsbx.2024.100117 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Selvaraj, C., Rajendran, S., Alothaim, A. S., Vijayakumar, R., Desai, D., Safi, S. Z., & Singh, S. K. (2025) · Chemical Papers · doi:10.1007/s11696-025-04007-6 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Synthetic Biology for Designing Allostery and Its Potential Biomedical Applications
Plaper, T., Štibler, U., & Jerala, R. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169225 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Damir, S. S., Probst, J., deMello, A. J., & Stavrakis, S. (2025) · Chemistry - Methods · doi:10.1002/cmtd.202500069 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The topological properties of the protein universe
Madsen, C. D., Barbensi, A., Zhang, S. Y., Ham, L., David, A., Pires, D. E. V., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61108-2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Next-generation drug discovery: The AI revolution in pharmaceutical research
Bilotta, M., Rocca, R., & Alcaro, S. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ailsci.2025.100149 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Suri, C., Ratre, Y. K., Pande, B., Bhaskar, L. V., & Verma, H. K. (2026) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v32.i1.111428 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Feldman, J., Brogi, M., & Skolnick, J. (2026) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.34133/csbj.0142 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Wang, P.-Z., Ge, M.-H., Su, P., Wu, P.-P., Wang, L., Zhu, W., Li, R., Liu, H., Wu, J.-J., Xu, Y., et al. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112215 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Antibiotic resistance in aquaculture: Contributions and perspectives of genomics
Hassen, B. (2026) · Aquaculture and Fisheries · doi:10.1016/j.aaf.2026.01.007 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Relaxation and single site multiple mutations to identify and control allosteric networks
Lee, E., Redzic, J. S., & Eisenmesser, E. Z. (2023) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2023.06.002 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Efraimidis, E., Krokidis, M. G., Exarchos, T. P., Lázár, T., & Vlamos, P. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241713543 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Kumar, D., Kumar, P., Ahmed, I., & Singh, S. (2023) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research · doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i11.48193 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Quantum AI in Healthcare : Revolutionizing Diagnosis, Treatment and Drug Discovery
Banerjee, N., & Chatterjee, K. (2024) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology · doi:10.32628/ijsrst2411351 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Computational analysis of regulatory regions in human protein kinases
Pei, J., & Cong, Q. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4764 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Protein Folding Pathway Prediction through Computational Methods
Zhao, K., Liang, F., Xia, Y., Hou, M., & Zhang, G. (2023) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0109298673265249231004193520 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wang, B., Wang, C., Chen, J., Liu, D., Sun, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, K., & Li, H. (2026) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-026-01198-9 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Structural Dynamics of Rho GTPases
Lin, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2024) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168919 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Neuropsychopharmacology in the era of artificial intelligence and biomolecule prediction software
Garcia-Reyes, R. A., Massó-Quiñones, L. N., Ruy, H., & Castro, D. C. (2025) · NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s44277-025-00038-9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Köse, U., & Uysal, İ. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3599025 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Explainable AI in Health Care: Trust and Transparency in AI-Powered Medical Diagnosis
Mohammed, Z. K. (2025) · Artificial intelligence · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1011279 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A protein dynamics–based deep learning model enhances predictions of fitness and epistasis
Huynh, N., Kazan, I. C., Lu, J., Kolbaba‐Kartchner, B., Mills, J. H., & Ozkan, S. B. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2502444122 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Reimagining computational macromolecular modeling: AI-driven approaches
Özdemir, E. S., Jang, H., Nussinov, R., Keskin, Ö., & Gürsoy, A. (2025) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2025.11.028 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationKholaif, N., Batha, L., Aljenedil, S., Awan, Z. A., Alruwaili, N., Habib, A. K., Jouda, A. A., Savo, M. T., Elmula, F. E. M. F., Mohamed, T. I., et al. (2025) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.119214 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hsieh, Y.-C., Delarue, M. H., Orland, H., & Koehl, P. (2023) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v15061366 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bundi, D. N. (2023) · Digital Transformation and Society · doi:10.1108/dts-06-2023-0041 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Analytical methods for protein kinase and inhibitor screening including kinetic evaluation
Wurster, V., Fechner, P., Proll, G., & Hühn, C. (2024) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2024.118025 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Raisinghani, N., Alshahrani, M., Gupta, G., Tian, H., Xiao, S., Tao, P., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.15.580591 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Palliative Oncology: Zeroing in on Hematologic Malignancies
Thirugnanasambandam, R. P., Bauer, A., & D'Angelo, C. R. (2025) · ONCOLOGY · doi:10.46883/2025.25921057 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Elkhatat, A. M., & Al‐Muhtaseb, S. A. (2026) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-026-07326-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nussinov, R., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Jang, H.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nussinov, Ruth
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2022-08-17
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 6372-6383
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- PMC
- PMC9442638
- OpenAlex
- W4292112379
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 205
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (HHSN261201500003I)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- AlphaFold, protein structure prediction, allosteric regulation, protein folding, conformational ensembles, intrinsically disordered proteins, protein-protein interaction, drug discovery, deep learning, molecular dynamics simulation, microbiota-host interactions
- MeSH terms
- Allosteric Regulation, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Protein Conformation, Protein Folding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review