Cited by 29Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingEducation for Peace and Conflict Resolution

Examining the efficacy of the Olweus prevention programme in reducing bullying: the Malaysian experience

Open access
Yaakub, Noran Fauziah, Haron, Fatimah, Leong, Goh Chee·2010·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Many countries have adapted or adopted the Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme after it was reported that there was a significant reduction in levels of bullying and being bullied. The positive changes were maintained 20 months after the intervention. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of the Olweus prevention programme in reducing bullying in selected schools in Malaysia. This study used an experimental pre-test/post-test comparison including a control group involving six secondary schools. Results showed some indication of the effectiveness of the bully-intervention programme in one of the schools. Intervention at the classroom level showed more positive results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.148

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The OBPP has demonstrated reductions in school bullying for different age groups across the globe.

    “The programme has been extensively researched over the last decade and has demonstrated reductions in school bullying for different age groups across the globe (e.g., Yaakub et al., 2010;Samara and Smith, 2008).”

    From A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Yaakub et al., 2010

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports positive outcomes in some countries but describes results across countries as varied and inconsistent, including no improvement among Flemish secondary-school students. Sections 3.1–3.2 (pages unavailable) find reductions in one Malaysian experimental school and among some Form Two students, while bullying increased overall across the experimental schools. The source therefore supports reductions in some settings, not the broad claim of demonstrated reductions across age groups and the globe. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yaakub, N. F., Haron, F., & Leong, G. C.
Affiliations
HELP University (MY)
Corresponding author
Yaakub, Noran Fauziah
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010
Volume
5
Pages
595-598
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057069476
Cited by
29
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
UNICEF
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education for Peace and Conflict Resolution
Keywords
bullying prevention, bullying, school-based intervention, secondary schools, intervention efficacy, Malaysia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review