The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Students’ Difficulties in Mathematics Problem-Solving: What do they Say?
Open accessAbstract
In Malaysia, like many other countries, problem solving is one of major aspect in mathematics curriculum which required students to apply and to integrate many mathematical concepts and skills as well as making decision. However, students were reported to have difficulties in mathematics problem solving. The focus of this study is to discuss the major mathematics skills and cognitive abilities in learning that caused the difficulties in mathematics problems-solving among students from students’ point of view. The study was carried out on three focused group samples that were selected through purposeful sampling. A mixed qualitative and quantitative approach is used in order to have clearer understanding. Apart from the questionnaire given, focused group interviews were carried out. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data finding was analyzed descriptively. Data findings showed that respondents lacked in many mathematics skills such as number-fact, visual-spatial and information skills. Information skill was the most critical. The deficiency of these mathematics skills and also of cognitive abilities in learning inhibits the mathematics problem-solving. This understanding on how the deficits influenced the problem-solving is expected to give effective guide lines in preparing diagnostic instruments and learning modules in order to develop the mathematics skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Creswell, J. W. (1994) · Cited by 35,204
Twycross, A. (2004) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2 · Cited by 2,031
Research Methods in Education: An Introduction
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1980) · Cited by 1,477
Mathematics and Learning Disabilities
Geary, D. C. (2004) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/00222194040370010201 · Cited by 1,245
Mathematical Discovery, On Understanding, Learning, and Teaching Problem Solving.
Zuckerman, H. S., & Polya, G. (1966) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2315372 · Cited by 782
Psychological testing and assessment
Aiken, L. R. (1976) · Cited by 601
Cooperative versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving
Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170710 · Cited by 488
van Garderen, D. (2006) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/00222194060390060201 · Cited by 291
Working memory deficit in children with mathematical difficulties: A general or specific deficit?
Andersson, U., & Lyxell, B. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.10.001 · Cited by 274
Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics
Goldin, G. A. (1998) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80056-1 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M.
- Venue
- Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 142-151
- ISSN
- 1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966657029
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Students’ Difficulties in Mathematics Problem-Solving: What do they Say? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020
- The paper
- Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ Difficulties in Mathematics Problem-Solving: What do they Say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.