Cited by 2Complex Network Analysis TechniquesData Visualization and AnalyticsKnowledge Management and Sharing

On visualizing knowledge flows at a university department

Open access
Windhager, Florian, Smuc, Michael, Zenk, Lukas, Federico, Paolo, Pfeffer, Jürgen, Aigner, Wolfgang·2013·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

The analysis of dynamic network data has become an increasingly relevant research issue, showing a high potential for applied use in organizations. To unlock its potential also for the target user group of non-domain experts, we introduce a software prototype, which provides different views on network dynamics, intertwining network analytical measures with options of visual exploration. To demonstrate, how this approach can provide new access to questions of knowledge management and accessibility, a case study of a university department will be discussed. By combining multi-relational data of communication networks with attribute data of individual knowledge domains, we show how essential knowledge and change management issues can be reframed from a social network perspective and further developed towards integrated applications in organizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.704

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge can be characterized along various dimensions, from explicit knowledge to tacit knowledge.

    “Knowledge can be characterized along various dimensions (Windhager et al., 2013), from explicit knowledge to tacit knowledge (Kogut & Zander, 1992;Nonaka & Von Krogh, 2009;Nonaka, 1994;Polanyi, 1962).”

    From Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory (2020) · cites this paper as Windhager et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Windhager, F., Smuc, M., Zenk, L., Federico, P., Pfeffer, J., & Aigner, W.
Affiliations
  • Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
  • TU Wien (AT)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
100
Pages
127-143
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038256153
Cited by
2
References
45
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
knowledge flows, knowledge management, dynamic network analysis, network visualization, communication networks, knowledge domains, change management, academic departments, software prototype, social networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review