The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entrepreneurship Education at University Level and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions
Open accessAbstract
There is a growing interest in entrepreneurship education expressed by politicians, higher education institutions and students. Entrepreneurship education has been shown to contribute to the development of students’ entrepreneurial intentions, although the findings are not entirely conclusive. The theoretical foundation of the current paper was the theory of planned behavior, TPB (Ajzen, 1991, Ajzen, 2005). The aim of the study was to identify the content of university entrepreneurship education and its impact for students’ entrepreneurial intentions. The study design used was cross-sectional study and the sample consisted of the students from 17 European countries that have been grouped for the purpose of analysis by the level of economic development into two country groups: efficiency-driven and innovation-driven economies (Porter et al., 2002). Frequencies and binary logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of different factors, including participation in entrepreneurship education, for entrepreneurial intentions. Results indicate that what is offered is not necessarily the most demanded in entrepreneurship education as lectures and seminars are provided more, but networking and coaching activities are expected more by the students. Participation in entrepreneurship education was found to exert positive impact on entrepreneurial intentions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Harrell, F. E. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 · Cited by 9,195
Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(98)00033-0 · Cited by 5,994
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
Conner, M. T., & McMillan, B. (2004) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 4,457
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
Brown, W., Galloway, L., & Levie, J. (2002) · Cited by 2,931
Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002 · Cited by 2,390
Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320701595438 · Cited by 1,839
Enterprise education: influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship
Peterman, N. E., & Kennedy, J. (2003) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003.00035.x · Cited by 1,764
Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology
Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas‐Clerc, N. (2006) · Journal of European Industrial Training · doi:10.1108/03090590610715022 · Cited by 1,407
Metadata
- Authors
- Küttim, M., Kallaste, M., Venesaar, U., & Kiis, A.
- Venue
- Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 110
- Pages
- 658-668
- ISSN
- 1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036309083
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 65.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entrepreneurship Education at University Level and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.910
- The paper
- Küttim, M., Kallaste, M., Venesaar, U., & Kiis, A. (2014). Entrepreneurship Education at University Level and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
