Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Students’ Perception on Using eLearning Technologies

Open access
Popovici, Anca, Mironov, Cosmina·2015·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

With the emergence of the Internet and new technologies, eLearning has become the promising solution for the Universities which are currently in an environment of intense change. Considering students’ perception toward eLearning technologies, their expertise in the field is important for successful development of the academic programs, since the attitude of the end user towards application of information technology is one of the most effective factors. The objectives of the research are: a) identification of students’ perception regarding e-learning; b) identification of e-learning practices employed by students in different contexts; c) identification of e-learning practices used in HE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.300

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Popovici, A., & Mironov, C.
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
180
Pages
1514-1519
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2221864936
Cited by
158
References
0
FWCI
23.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Students’ Perception on Using eLearning Technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.300
The paper
Popovici, A., & Mironov, C. (2015). Students’ Perception on Using eLearning Technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.300

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.