Cited by 1Stuttering Research and TreatmentObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hypnosis as a Technique for the Treatment of Stuttering

Open access
Zloof, A., Ezrati-Vinacour, R.·2015·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Various recorded studies have found that it is possible to reduce the severity of stuttering through the use of hypnosis. Yet, there have been very limited studies on the effect of hypnosis as a means of stuttering treatment. Some studies concluded that hypnosis reduces the severity of stuttering in the long term (Moss & Oackley, 1997), while others claim to a short term effect (Bloodstein, 1995). Most studies do not elaborate on the measures or techniques used to evaluate the impact of hypnosis treatment on stuttering. This study examined the influence of hypnotic therapy on a PWS volunteer. The stammering was analyzed in two ways: 1) Measurement of the overt stammering: a. percentage of stammering syllables- ss%, b. Stuttering like dysfluency SLD (Yairi, 1996). c. average number of repetitions (Ambrose & Yairi 1999). 2) Measurement of covert stammering was done by: a. Speech Situation Checklist-SSC (Brutten, 1985). b. State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Spielberger, 1966). During the hypnosis the participant was offered suggestions of ego strengthening, treating past traumas, and enhancing his sense of control. The treatment took place through 8 treatment sessions and one follow up session. The suggestions were offered to try to reduce the severity of both the overt and covert features of stammering. The stuttering was recorded while reading and spontaneously speaking in the beginning and ending of each session. In addition, two questionnaires were filled in at the beginning and ending of therapy. The results showed that the stammering severity was reduced at the end of each session compared to the beginning. The results also showed that some of the improvements only lasted a short period of time while others lasted until the follow up session. Moreover, the covert features of stammering pointed to a change in the subject's feelings and perceptions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.325

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zloof, A., & Ezrati-Vinacour, R.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Zloof, A.
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
193
Pages
357
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1687172954
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
stuttering, hypnosis, hypnotherapy, stuttering severity, repetition, ego strengthening, trauma treatment, perceived control, anxiety, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review