Structural disruption of the dorsal cingulum bundle is associated with impaired stroop performance in patients with schizophrenia
Abstract
Previous diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies have shown structural abnormalities of the cingulum bundle (CB) in patients with schizophrenia. However, regional specificity and functional relevance of the pregenual and dorsal CB subdivisions has not been fully studied. In the current study, 31 patients with schizophrenia and 65 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects underwent DTI to measure fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) in cross sections of dorsal and pregenual CB tractography. To test the hypothesis of region-specific association with neurocognition, all of the patients and 31 controls performed the Stroop task, which is assumed to mainly involve dorsal cingulate function. The verbal memory subscale of Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised and premorbid IQs estimated from the Japanese version of the National Adult Reading Test, which were non-specific to dorsal cingulate function, were also employed as control neurocognitive indices. Significant bilateral FA reductions in the pregenual and dorsal CB, and bilateral MD increases in the dorsal CB were observed in the patients compared with the controls. As predicted, significant associations between DTI measures and neurocognition were found in the schizophrenia group only: double-dissociable correlation between higher MD in the dorsal, not in the pregenual CB, and a longer reaction time in the Stroop task, not verbal memory or premorbid IQs. The current DTI study suggests that structural disruption of the dor…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cingulum FA correlations with executive function are more consistent in schizophrenia than in ASD.
“Arguably, more consistent cingulum FA correlations with executive function have been found in schizophrenia (Kubicki et al., 2009; Spalletta et al., 2014; Takei et al., 2009; see Table 2).”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Takei et al., 2009
Cites
Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K. W., & Raichle, M. E. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.1.256 · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Johnson, M. K., Stenger, V. A., Aizenstein, H., & Carter, C. S. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1833 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Progressive changes of white matter integrity in schizophrenia revealed by diffusion tensor imaging
Mori, T., Ohnishi, T., Hashimoto, R., Nemoto, K., Moriguchi, Y., Noguchi, H., Nakabayashi, T., Hori, H., Harada, S., Saitoh, O., et al. (2007) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.09.004 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction
Bubb, E. J., Metzler-Baddeley, C., & Aggleton, J. P. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.008 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
The global cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: consistent over decades and around the world
Schaefer, J., Giangrande, E., Weinberger, D. R., & Dickinson, D. (2013) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.009 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
What did you do yesterday? A meta-analysis of sex differences in episodic memory.
Asperholm, M., Högman, N., Rafi, J., & Herlitz, A. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000197 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
- Authors
- Takei, K., Yamasue, H., Abe, O., Yamada, H., Inoue, H., Suga, M., Muroi, M., Sasaki, H., Aoki, S., & Kasai, K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 119-127
- ISSN
- 0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118034634
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Cognition Disorders, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reaction Time, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Statistics as Topic, Visual Perception, Case-Control Studies, Anisotropy, Statistics, Nonparametric, Recognition, Psychology, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review