Cited by 185Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety and proof of principle study of cerebellar vermal theta burst stimulation in refractory schizophrenia

Open access
Demirtas-Tatlidede, Asli, Freitas, Catarina, Cromer, Jennifer R., Safar, Laura, Ongur, Dost, Stone, William S., Seidman, Larry J., Schmahmann, Jeremy D., Pascual-Leone, Alvaro·2010·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Background Early invasive electrical stimulation studies suggested that enhancement of cerebellar vermal activity might prove valuable in symptomatic treatment of refractory neuropsychiatric diseases via modulation of emotion and affect. This proof of principle study aimed to test this hypothesis using noninvasive brain stimulation, and to explore the safety of this protocol in schizophrenia. Methods Eight treatment-refractory patients with schizophrenia underwent ten sessions of intermittent theta burst stimulation (TBS) to the cerebellar vermis using MRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Assessments included side effect questionnaires, cardiovascular monitoring, psychiatric evaluations and comprehensive neuropsychological testing before and after TBS and at one-week follow-up. Results Overall, TBS was tolerated well with mild side effects primarily comprising neck pain and headache. No serious adverse events occurred. Diastolic blood pressure (BP) showed mild decreases for five minutes post-TBS; no significant changes were detected for systolic BP or pulse. PANSS negative subscale showed significant improvements following TBS and during the follow-up. Calgary Depression Scale and self-report visual analog scales for Happiness and Sadness pointed to significant mood elevation. Neuropsychological testing revealed significantly fewer omissions in working memory and interference conditions of a Continuous Performance Test, a longer spatial span and better delay organization on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure during follow-up. No significant worsening in psychiatric or neuropsychological measures was detected. Conclusions Theta burst stimulation of the cerebellar vermis is safe and well-tolerated, while offering the potential to modulate affect, emotion and cognition in schizophrenia. Future randomized, sham-stimulation controlled studies are warranted to support the clinical efficacy of this technique.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.015

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 101 references

1 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Courville, 1940, Chronic progressive degeneration of superior cerebellar cortex (parenchymatous conical cerebellar atrophy) with particular reference to its pathogenesis and pathology, Bull. Los Angeles Neurol. Soc., 5, 171

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–185 of 185

Metadata

Authors
Demirtas-Tatlidede, A., Freitas, C., Cromer, J. R., Safar, L., Ongur, D., Stone, W. S., Seidman, L. J., Schmahmann, J. D., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
124
Issue
1-3
Pages
91-100
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129217681
Cited by
185
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (K24RR018875, UL1RR025758)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
theta burst stimulation, cerebellar vermis
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Cerebellum, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Happiness, Headache, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Theta Rhythm, Treatment Outcome, Neck Pain, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review