The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety and proof of principle study of cerebellar vermal theta burst stimulation in refractory schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
Background Early invasive electrical stimulation studies suggested that enhancement of cerebellar vermal activity might prove valuable in symptomatic treatment of refractory neuropsychiatric diseases via modulation of emotion and affect. This proof of principle study aimed to test this hypothesis using noninvasive brain stimulation, and to explore the safety of this protocol in schizophrenia. Methods Eight treatment-refractory patients with schizophrenia underwent ten sessions of intermittent theta burst stimulation (TBS) to the cerebellar vermis using MRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Assessments included side effect questionnaires, cardiovascular monitoring, psychiatric evaluations and comprehensive neuropsychological testing before and after TBS and at one-week follow-up. Results Overall, TBS was tolerated well with mild side effects primarily comprising neck pain and headache. No serious adverse events occurred. Diastolic blood pressure (BP) showed mild decreases for five minutes post-TBS; no significant changes were detected for systolic BP or pulse. PANSS negative subscale showed significant improvements following TBS and during the follow-up. Calgary Depression Scale and self-report visual analog scales for Happiness and Sadness pointed to significant mood elevation. Neuropsychological testing revealed significantly fewer omissions in working memory and interference conditions of a Continuous Performance Test, a longer spatial span and better delay organization on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure during follow-up. No significant worsening in psychiatric or neuropsychological measures was detected. Conclusions Theta burst stimulation of the cerebellar vermis is safe and well-tolerated, while offering the potential to modulate affect, emotion and cognition in schizophrenia. Future randomized, sham-stimulation controlled studies are warranted to support the clinical efficacy of this technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“as prior work suggested that improvement could occur even in patients with low baseline symptoms (Demirtas-Tatlidede et al., 2010)”
From A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial of cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation for bipolar disorder: Safety, tolerability, mood and cognitive effects (2025) · cites this paper as Demirtas-Tatlidede et al., 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In subjects with schizophrenia, CBM-iTBS can alter brain metabolism and cerebellar-frontal functional connectivity (Basavaraju et al., 2021; Brady et al., 2019; Cho et al., 2012; Halko et al., 2014; Singh et al., 2019), as well as positively impact affective and cognitive symptoms (Basavaraju et al., 2021; Demirtas-Tatlidede et al., 2010; Garg et al., 2016; Shinn et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2021).”
From A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial of cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation for bipolar disorder: Safety, tolerability, mood and cognitive effects (2025) · cites this paper as Demirtas-Tatlidede et al., 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Specifically, a protocol of ten sessions of CBM-iTBS (delivered over 1–2 weeks) in patients with schizophrenia has demonstrated safety and tolerability (Demirtas-Tatlidede et al., 2010), reduced negative symptoms, improvements in mood, and improvements in cognitive functioning (Garg et al., 2016), with significant findings up to 24 weeks following treatment in controlled trials (Zhu et al., 2021).”
From A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial of cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation for bipolar disorder: Safety, tolerability, mood and cognitive effects (2025) · cites this paper as Demirtas-Tatlidede et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Veizel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2519 · Cited by 5,546
Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016 · Cited by 5,367
Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex
Huang, Y.-Z., Edwards, M. J., Rounis, E., Bhatia, K. P., & Rothwell, J. C. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033 · Cited by 4,158
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome
Schmahmann, J. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.4.561 · Cited by 3,230
Self-citationA Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests
Selnes, O. A. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.11.1856-a · Cited by 2,278
A CLASSIFICATION OF HAND PREFERENCE BY ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS
Annett, M. (1970) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01248.x · Cited by 2,271
Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
STOODLEY, C., & SCHMAHMANN, J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039 · Cited by 2,183
Self-citationShunk, A. W., Davis, A. S., & Dean, R. S. (2006) · Applied Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15324826an1304_9 · Cited by 1,540
California Verbal Learning Test
Delis, D. C., Freeland, J., Kramer, J. H., & Kaplan, E. (1987) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t48844-000 · Cited by 1,450
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Courville, 1940, Chronic progressive degeneration of superior cerebellar cortex (parenchymatous conical cerebellar atrophy) with particular reference to its pathogenesis and pathology, Bull. Los Angeles Neurol. Soc., 5, 171
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schmahmann, J. D. (2019) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005 · Cited by 1,625
Self-citationConsensus Paper: The Cerebellum's Role in Movement and Cognition
Koziol, L. F., Budding, D. E., Andreasen, N. C., D’Arrigo, S., Bulgheroni, S., Imamizu, H., Ito, M., Manto, M. U., Marvel, C. L., Parker, K. L., et al. (2013) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-013-0511-x · Cited by 1,193
Self-citationManto, M. U., Bower, J. M., Conforto, A. B., Delgado-Garcia, J. M., da Guarda, S. N. F., Gerwig, M., Habas, C., Hagura, N., Ivry, R. B., Mariën, P., et al. (2011) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-011-0331-9 · Cited by 1,064
Schmahmann, J. D. (2010) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-010-9142-x · Cited by 583
Self-citationThe Theory and Neuroscience of Cerebellar Cognition
Schmahmann, J. D., Guell, X., Stoodley, C. J., & Halko, M. A. (2019) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050258 · Cited by 587
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Demirtas-Tatlidede, A., Freitas, C., Cromer, J. R., Safar, L., Ongur, D., Stone, W. S., Seidman, L. J., Schmahmann, J. D., & Pascual-Leone, A.
- Affiliations
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 91-100
- ISSN
- 0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3268232
- OpenAlex
- W2129217681
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (K24RR018875, UL1RR025758)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- theta burst stimulation, cerebellar vermis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Pressure, Cerebellum, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Happiness, Headache, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Theta Rhythm, Treatment Outcome, Neck Pain, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review