Cited by 24Schizophrenia research and treatmentStress Responses and CortisolPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Pituitary volume in individuals at elevated risk for psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Saunders, Tyler S., Mondelli, Valeria, Cullen, Alexis E.·2019·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Background Pituitary volume (PV) abnormalities, representing one of several markers of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, have been observed in psychosis, with variable patterns across illness stages. Typically, enlargements characterise first-episode patients, with reductions observed in those with chronic illness relative to healthy controls. Findings in high-risk populations have been inconsistent, highlighting the need for an updated review of the evidence. Methods We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and EMBASE for studies examining PV in high-risk [clinical high-risk (CHR), family history of psychosis (FHx), schizotypal personality disorder (SPD), and psychotic-experiences (PEs)] and healthy individuals. Random effects models were used to examine group differences in PV (Hedges g) with stratified analyses and meta-regression employed to investigate the effect of high-risk category, transition status, age, sex, and antipsychotic medication. Results Ten studies, yielding 11 effect sizes, were eligible for inclusion. Overall, high-risk individuals had significantly larger PV relative to healthy controls (g = 0.16 [95% CI: 0.01 to 0.32] p = 0.04), despite showing a reduction in whole brain volume (g = -0.17, [95% CI. -0.30 to -0.03] p = 0.020). Individual sub-group analyses for CHR and FHx groups showed no significant differences relative to controls; however, larger PV increases characterised those who later transitioned to psychosis (g = 0.55, [95% CI. 0.06…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.026

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saunders, T. S., Mondelli, V., & Cullen, A. E.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Cullen, Alexis E.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
213
Pages
23-31
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2908300620
Cited by
24
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (107395/Z/15/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2008-17-005)
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-SGCL5-Mondelli)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
pituitary volume, psychosis risk
MeSH terms
Disease Susceptibility, Humans, Pituitary Gland, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizotypal Personality Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review