Cited by 41Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Switching to Antipsychotic Monotherapy vs. Staying on Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Matsui, Kentaro, Tokumasu, Takahiro, Takekita, Yoshiteru, Inada, Ken, Kanazawa, Tetsufumi, Kishimoto, Taishiro, Takasu, Shotaro, Tani, Hideaki +5 more·2019·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Background While recent meta-analyses have reported the superiority of antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) over antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) in schizophrenia, switching to APM can be beneficial in terms of side effects. To determine whether patients receiving APP should switch to APM or stay on APP, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining a switch from APP to APM vs. staying on APP were systematically selected from a previous meta-analysis comparing APP with APM in patients with schizophrenia. In addition, we conducted an updated systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data on study discontinuation, relapse, psychopathology, neurocognition, extrapyramidal symptoms, and body weight/body mass index (BMI) were extracted and synthesized. Results A total of 6 RCTs involving 341 patients were included. All studies examined a switch from 2 antipsychotic agents to a single agent. Clozapine-treated patients were included in 3 studies. There was a significant difference in study discontinuation due to all causes in favor of staying on APP (N = 6, n = 341, RR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.50-3.46, P Conclusions The findings suggest that clinicians should closely monitor patient condition when switching to APM after receiving 2 antipsychotics. Given the low to very low overall quality of the evidence, the findings should be considered preliminary and inconclusive.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2019.05.030

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsui, K., Tokumasu, T., Takekita, Y., Inada, K., Kanazawa, T., Kishimoto, T., Takasu, S., Tani, H., Tarutani, S., Hashimoto, N., Yamada, H., Yamanouchi, Y., & Takeuchi, H.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Women's Medical University (JP)
  • SHOWA Medical University (JP)
  • Kansai Medical University (JP)
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
Corresponding author
Takeuchi, Hiroyoshi
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
209
Pages
50-57
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953969325
Cited by
41
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants (H29-Seishin-Ippan-001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
schizophrenia, antipsychotic monotherapy
MeSH terms
Deprescriptions, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Patient Selection, Polypharmacy, Drug Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review