Cited by 342Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Testing and AssessmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Norms and standardization of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)

KEEFE, R, HARVEY, P, GOLDBERG, T, GOLD, J, WALKER, T, KENNEL, C, HAWKINS, K·2008·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

According to the recommendations of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Neurocognition Committee, one of the desired characteristics of a cognitive battery for assessing cognition in schizophrenia studies and clinical trials is the availability of normative data. This report describes normative data collected on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) from 404 healthy controls with demographic characteristics matching the 2005 United States Census of English-speakers. The six test measures demonstrated the expected pattern of correlations with age, gender, and education. Individual test scores were converted into standardized (T and z) scores and composite scores that were corrected for age and gender. An education-correction factor was calculated and recommended only for non-schizophrenia patients. Eight different verbal memory tests were found to have equivalent levels of difficulty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2008.03.024

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 8 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KEEFE, R., HARVEY, P., GOLDBERG, T., GOLD, J., WALKER, T., KENNEL, C., & HAWKINS, K.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Zucker Hillside Hospital (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
KEEFE, R
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
102
Issue
1-3
Pages
108-115
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018927895
Cited by
342
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, BACS
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cognition Disorders, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Control Groups, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review