Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction over Zn-based layered double hydroxides containing tri or tetravalent metals

Open access
Xiong, Xuyang, Zhao, Yufei, Shi, Run, Yin, Wenjin, Zhao, Yunxuan, Waterhouse, Geoffrey I.N., Zhang, Tierui·2020·Science Bulletin

Abstract

Photocatalytic CO2 reduction holds promise as a future technology for the manufacture of fuels and commodity chemicals. However, factors controlling product selectivity remain poorly understood. Herein, we compared the performance of a homologous series of Zn-based layered double hydroxide (ZnM-LDH) photocatalysts for CO2 reduction. By varying the trivalent or tetravalent metal cations in the ZnM-LDH photocatalysts (M = Ti4+, Fe3+, Co3+, Ga3+, Al3+), the product selectivity of the reaction could be precisely controlled. ZnTi-LDH afforded CH4 as the main reduction product; ZnFe-LDH and ZnCo-LDH yielded H2 exclusively from water splitting; whilst ZnGa-LDH and ZnAl-LDH generated CO. In-situ diffuse reflectance infrared measurements, valence band XPS and density function theory calculations were applied to rationalize the CO2 reduction selectivities of the different ZnM-LDH photocatalysts. The analyses revealed that the d-band center (εd) position of the M3+ or M4+ cations controlled the adsorption strength of CO2 and thus the selectivity to carbon-containing products or H2. Cations with d-band centers relatively close to the Fermi level (Ti4+, Ga3+ and Al3+) adsorbed CO2 strongly yielding CH4 or CO, whereas metal cations with d-band centers further from the Fermi level (Fe3+ and Co3+) adsorbed CO2 poorly, thereby yielding H2 only (from water splitting). Our findings clarify the role of trivalent and tetravalent metal cations in LDH photocatalysts for the selective CO2 reduction, paving new ways for the development of improved LDH photocatalyst with high selectivities to specific products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scib.2020.03.032

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Metadata

Authors
Xiong, X., Zhao, Y., Shi, R., Yin, W., Zhao, Y., Waterhouse, G. I. N., & Zhang, T.
Venue
Science Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
65
Issue
12
Pages
987-994
ISSN
2095-9273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013222604
Cited by
346
References
34
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction over Zn-based layered double hydroxides containing tri or tetravalent metals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scib.2020.03.032
The paper
Xiong, X., Zhao, Y., Shi, R., Yin, W., Zhao, Y., Waterhouse, G. I. N., & Zhang, T. (2020). Selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction over Zn-based layered double hydroxides containing tri or tetravalent metals. Science Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2020.03.032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.