The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction with H2O on TiO2 Nanocrystals: Comparison of Anatase, Rutile, and Brookite Polymorphs and Exploration of Surface Chemistry
Abstract
CO 2 photoreduction with water vapor has been studied on three TiO 2 nanocrystal polymorphs (anatase, rutile, and brookite) that were engineered with defect-free and oxygen-deficient surfaces, respectively. It was demonstrated that helium pretreatment of the as-prepared TiO 2 at a moderate temperature resulted in the creation of surface oxygen vacancies (V O ) and Ti 3+ sites on anatase and brookite but not on rutile. The production of CO and CH 4 from CO 2 photoreduction was remarkably enhanced on defective anatase and brookite TiO 2 (up to 10-fold enhancement) as compared to the defect-free surfaces. Defective brookite was photocatalytically more active than anatase and rutile, probably because of a lower formation energy of V O on brookite. The results from in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) analyses suggested that (1) defect-free TiO 2 was not active for CO 2 photoreduction since no CO 2 – is generated, and (2) CO 2 photoreduction to CO possibly underwent different reaction pathways on oxygen-deficient anatase and brookite via different intermediates (e.g., CO 2 – on anatase; CO 2 – and HCOOH on brookite). The combined DRIFTS and photoactivity studies reported in this paper have provided new insights to the role of surface defects in CO 2 photoreduction on TiO 2 nanocrystals, and revealed significant information on the much less studied but promising brookite phase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Advances in Inorganic Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for Reduction of Carbon Dioxide
Zhu, D. D., Liu, J. L., & Qiao, S. Z. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201504766 · Cited by 1,594
Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile? - Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films
Luttrell, T., Halpegamage, S., Tao, J., Kramer, A., Sutter, E., & Batzill, M. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04043 · Cited by 1,544
Recent Advances in Heterogeneous Photocatalytic CO 2 Conversion to Solar Fuels
Li, K., Peng, B., & Peng, T. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02089 · Cited by 1,355
Modified TiO 2 photocatalyst for CO 2 photocatalytic reduction: An overview
Abdullah, H., Khan, M. M. R., Ong, H. R., & Yaakob, Z. (2017) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2017.08.004 · Cited by 341
Le Bahers, T., Rérat, M., & Sautet, P. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp409724c · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, L., Zhao, H., Andino, J. M., & Li, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-07-25
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1817-1828
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2333139765
- Cited by
- 870
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction with H2O on TiO2 Nanocrystals: Comparison of Anatase, Rutile, and Brookite Polymorphs and Exploration of Surface Chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cs300273q
- The paper
- Liu, L., Zhao, H., Andino, J. M., & Li, Y. (2012). Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction with H2O on TiO2 Nanocrystals: Comparison of Anatase, Rutile, and Brookite Polymorphs and Exploration of Surface Chemistry. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300273q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.