CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 476Arsenic contamination and mitigationHeavy metals in environmentGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mobilization of arsenic by dissolved organic matter from iron oxides, soils and sediments

Bauer, Markus, Blodau, Christian·2006·Science of The Total Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.027
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The arsenic contamination of aquifers has been linked to the input of dissolved organic matter (DOM). In light of this suggestion, the aim of this study was to quantify chemical effects of DOM on desorption and redox transformations of arsenic bound to synthetic iron oxide and natural samples from different geochemical environments (soils, shallow aquifer, lake sediment). In batch experiments, solutions containing 25-50 mg/L of two different types of DOM (purified peat humic acid and DOM from a peat drainage) were used as extractants in comparison to inorganic solutions. DOM solution was able to mobilize arsenic from all solid phases. Mobilization from iron oxides (maximum: 53.3%) was larger than from natural samples (maximum: 2.9%). The mobilization effect of extractants decreased in the order HCl>NaH2PO4>DOM>NaNO3. DOM solutions, therefore, mainly targeted weakly sorbed arsenic. Mobilization was complete within 24-36 h and DOM was sorbed during incubation indicating competition for sorption sites. The same patterns were observed for different DOM types and concentrations. Addition of DOM lead to (a) enhanced reduction (maximum 7.8%) and oxidation (6.4%) of arsenic in aqueous solution and (b) the appearance of arsenite in aqueous phase of soil samples (5.5%). As the primary mechanism for the arsenic release from solid phases we identified the competition between arsenic and organic anions for sorption sites, whereas redox reactions were probably of minor importance. The resu…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Abbt-Braun, 2002, Huminstoffe-Vorkommen, Charakterisierung und Reaktionen, Wasser-und Geotechnologie, 1, 41
  2. Anawar, 2003, Geochemical occurrence of arsenic in groundwater of Bangladesh: sources and mobilization processes, J Geochem Explor, 77, 109, 10.1016/S0375-6742(02)00273-X · DOI
  3. Appelo, 2002, Surface complexation of ferrous iron and carbonate on ferrohydrite and the mobilization of arsenic, Environ Sci Technol, 36, 3096, 10.1021/es010130n · DOI
  4. Bissen, 2003, Arsenic—a review: Part I. Occurrences, toxicity, speciation, mobility, Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol, 31, 9, 10.1002/aheh.200390025 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chen, 2002, Spectroscopic characterization of the structural and functional properties of natural organic matter fractions, Chemosphere, 48, 59, 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00041-3 · DOI
  6. Chen, 2003, The roles of natural organic matter in chemical and microbial reduction of ferric iron, Sci Total Environ, 307, 167, 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00538-7 · DOI
  7. Cherry, 1979, Arsenic species as an indicator of redox conditions in groundwater, J Hydrol, 43, 373, 10.1016/0022-1694(79)90182-3 · DOI
  8. Chui, 2000, Arsenic adsorption and oxidation at manganite surfaces: 1. Method for simultaneous determination of adsorbed and dissolved arsenic species, Environ Sci Technol, 34, 2029, 10.1021/es990788p · DOI
  9. Cullen, 1989, Arsenic speciation in the environment, Chem Rev, 89, 713, 10.1021/cr00094a002 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dixit, 2003, Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility, Environ Sci Technol, 37, 4182, 10.1021/es030309t · DOI
  11. Fossing, 1989, Measurement of bacterial sulfate reduction in sediments: evaluation of single step chromium reduction method, Biogeochemistry, 8, 205, 10.1007/BF00002889 · DOI
  12. Grafe, 2001, Adsorption of arsenate(V) and arsenite(III) on goethite in the presence and absence of dissolved organic carbon, Soil Sci Soc Am J, 65, 1680, 10.2136/sssaj2001.1680 · DOI
  13. Grafe, 2002, Adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on ferrihydrite in the presence and absence of dissolved organic carbon, J Environ Qual, 31, 1115, 10.2134/jeq2002.1115 · DOI
  14. Gu, 2003, Enhanced microbial reduction of Cr(VI) and U(VI) by different natural organic matter fractions, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 67, 3575, 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00162-5 · DOI
  15. Harvey, 2002, Arsenic mobility and groundwater extraction in Bangladesh, Science, 298, 1602, 10.1126/science.1076978 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Haynes, 1985, Effects of air-drying on the adsorption and desorption of phosphate and levels of extractable phosphate in a group of acid soils, Geoderma, 35, 145, 10.1016/0016-7061(85)90027-8 · DOI
  17. Janos, 2002, Leaching of metals from fly ashes in the presence of complexing agents, Waste Manage, 22, 783, 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00039-9 · DOI
  18. Kaiser, 1997, Dissolved organic matter sorption on subsoils and minerals studied by 13C-NMR and DRIFT spectroscopy, Eur J Soil Sci, 48, 301, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00550.x · DOI
  19. Kalbitz, 1998, Mobilization of heavy metals and arsenic in polluted wetland soils and its dependance on dissolved organic matter, Sci Total Environ, 209, 27, 10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00302-1 · DOI
  20. Keon, 2001, Validation of an arsenic sequential extraction method for evaluating mobility in sediments, Environ Sci Technol, 35, 2778, 10.1021/es001511o · DOI
  21. Kohlmeyer, 2002, Simultaneous separation of 17 inorganic and organic arsenic compounds in marine biota by means of high-performance liquid chromatography/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 16, 965, 10.1002/rcm.671 · DOI
  22. Lin, 2002, Effects of water extract of compost on the adsorption of arsenate by two calcareous soils, Water Air Soil Pollut, 138, 359, 10.1023/A:1015534302225 · DOI
  23. Livesey, 1981, Adsorption of arsenate by soil and its relation to selected chemical properties and anions, Soil Sci, 131, 88, 10.1097/00010694-198102000-00004 · DOI
  24. Lombi, 2000, Sequentially extracted arsenic from different size fractions of contaminated soils, Water Air Soil Pollut, 124, 319, 10.1023/A:1005230628958 · DOI
  25. Masscheleyn, 1991, Effect of redox potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil, Environ Sci Technol, 25, 1414, 10.1021/es00020a008 · DOI · Paper page
  26. McCleskey, 2004, Preservation of water samples for arsenic (III/V) determination: an evaluation of the literature and new analytical results, Appl Geochem, 19, 995, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.01.003 · DOI
  27. Newman, 1998, A brief review of microbial arsenate respiration, Geomicrobiol J, 15, 255, 10.1080/01490459809378082 · DOI
  28. Peiffer, 2003, Vergleich verschiedener Elutionsverfahren im Hinblick auf die Verfahrensoptimierung zur Sickerwasserprognose von Chrom und Arsen. Sickerwasserprognose-Forschung und Praxis, Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft, 89
  29. Redman, 2002, Natural organic matter affects arsenic speciation and sorption onto hematite, Environ Sci Technol, 36, 2889, 10.1021/es0112801 · DOI
  30. Rochette, 2000, Kinetics of arsenate reduction by dissolved sulfide, Environ Sci Technol, 34, 4714, 10.1021/es000963y · DOI
  31. Saada, 2003, Adsorption of arsenic (V) on kaolinite and on kaolinite–humic acid complexes Role of humic acid nitrogen groups, Chemosphere, 51, 757, 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00219-4 · DOI
  32. Schwarzenbach, 1990, Quinone and iron porphyrin mediated reduction of nitroaromatic compounds in homogenous aqueous solution, Environ Sci Technol, 24, 1566, 10.1021/es00080a017 · DOI
  33. Scott, 1998, Quinone moieties act as electron acceptors in the reduction of humic substances by humic-reducing microorganisms, Environ Sci Technol, 32, 2984, 10.1021/es980272q · DOI
  34. Simeoni, 2003, Effect of groundwater fulvic acid on the adsorption of arsenate by ferrihydrite and gibbsite, Appl Geochem, 18, 1507, 10.1016/S0883-2927(03)00074-X · DOI
  35. Smedley, 2002, A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters, Appl Geochem, 17, 517, 10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Smith, 2002, Chemistry of inorganic arsenic in soils: II. Effect of phosphorus, sodium, and calcium on arsenic sorption, J Environ Qual, 31, 557, 10.2134/jeq2002.0557 · DOI
  37. Strauss, 1997, Effects of crystallinity of goethite: II. Rates of sorption and desorption of phosphate, Eur J Soil Sci, 48, 101, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00189.x · DOI
  38. Stueben, 2001, Environmental monitoring of heavy metals and arsenic from Ag–Pb–Zn mining, Environ Monit Assess, 70, 181, 10.1023/A:1010663631647 · DOI
  39. Sun, 1996, An investigation of arsenate and arsenite bonding structures on goethite by FTIR, Soil Sci, 161, 865, 10.1097/00010694-199612000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Xie, 1991, Effects of autoclaving on the surface properties and sorption of phosphate and zinc in phosphate-treated soils, Soil Sci, 152, 250, 10.1097/00010694-199110000-00003 · DOI
  41. Xu, 1991, Effects of acidification and natural organic materials on the mobility of arsenic in the environment, Water Air Soil Pollut, 57–58, 269, 10.1007/BF00282890 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 476

Metadata

Authors
Bauer, M., & Blodau, C.
Affiliations
University of Bayreuth (DE)
Corresponding author
Bauer, Markus
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
354
Issue
2-3
Pages
179-190
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.027
OpenAlex
W2100619860
Cited by
476
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
arsenic mobilization, dissolved organic matter, iron oxide, arsenic sorption, arsenic desorption, arsenite, humic acid, peat, groundwater contamination, lake sediments, soil, arsenic speciation
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Arsenates, Arsenic, Humic Substances, Minerals, Oxidation-Reduction, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Arsenites, Geologic Sediments, Iron Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review