Cited by 282Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsWater Quality and Pollution Assessment

Selected stormwater priority pollutants — a European perspective

Open access
Eriksson, E., Baun, A., Scholes, L., Ledin, A., Ahlman, S., Revitt, M., Noutsopoulos, C., Mikkelsen, P.S.·2007·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The chemical characteristics of stormwater are dependent on the nature of surfaces (roads, roofs etc.) with which it comes into contact during the runoff process as well as natural processes and anthropogenic activities in the catchments. The different types of pollutants may cause problems during utilisation, detention or discharge of stormwater to the environment and may pose specific demands to decentralised treatment. This paper proposes a scientifically justifiable list of selected stormwater priority pollutants (SSPP) to be used, e.g., for evaluation of the chemical risks occurring in different handling strategies. The SSPP-list consists of 25 pollutant parameters including eight of the priority pollutants currently identified in the European Water Framework Directive. It contains general water quality parameters (organic and suspended matter, nutrients and pH); metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Pt and Zn); PAH (naphthalene, pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene); herbicides (pendimethalin, phenmedipham, glyphosate and terbutylazine); and other representative industrially derived compounds (nonylphenol ethoxylates, pentachlorophenol, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, PCB-28 and methyl tert-butyl ether). Tools for flux modelling, enabling calculation of predicted environmental concentrations (PECs), and for ranking the susceptibility of a pollutant to removal within a range of structural stormwater treatment systems or best management practices (BMPs) have been developed, but further work is req…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.05.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urban stormwater introduces ecologically relevant quantities of many target pollutants, including nutrients (N and P), heavy metals, herbicides, personal care products, pharmaceuticals, and several plasticizers and common industrial chemicals.

    “urban stormwater introduces ecologically relevant quantities of many target pollutants (United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 2010; Loperfido et al. 2014) including nutrients (N and P), heavy metals, herbicides, personal care products, pharmaceuticals, and several plasticizers and common industrial chemicals”
  • Eriksson et al. (2007) defined four main groups of BMPs that can be implemented over broad areas: (1) filter strips or swales; (2) infiltration systems (e.g., infiltration basins or trenches); (3) storage facilities (e.g., retention ponds, treatment wetlands; and (4) alternative roads (e.g., porous pavements).

    “Eriksson et al. (2007), defined four main groups of BMPs that can be implemented over broad areas: (1) filter strips or swales; (2) infiltration systems (e.g., infiltration basins or trenches); (3) storage facilities (e.g., retention ponds, treatment wetlands; and (4) alternative roads (e.g., porous pavements; Table 1).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 282

Authors
Eriksson, E., Baun, A., Scholes, L., Ledin, A., Ahlman, S., Revitt, M., Noutsopoulos, C., & Mikkelsen, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Middlesex University London (GB)
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Eriksson, E.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
383
Issue
1-3
Pages
41-51
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001392185
Cited by
282
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace - NTUA (National Technical University of Athens) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Miljøstyrelsen
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Keywords
stormwater pollution, urban runoff, Water Framework Directive, heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, herbicides, nonylphenol ethoxylates, pentachlorophenol, DEHP, PCB 28, methyl tert-butyl ether, predicted environmental concentration, best management practices, stormwater monitoring, chemical risk assessment
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Europe, Rain, Water Movements, Water Pollutants, Water Pollution, Waste Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review