The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms
Open accessAbstract
Ecosystem-service indicators and related accounting units are crucial for the development of decision frameworks for sustainable land management systems. With a management concept using ecosystem services, land-use expectations can be linked to quantifiable soil features in a defendable and transparent way. A method to define a set of site-specific ecosystem services and indication system for quantification was set-up and run. First, we interviewed a wide group of land users profiting from ecosystem services of the soil at four arable farms in the polder Hoeksche Waard (S-SE of Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Subsequently, site-specific ecosystem services were defined and weighted according to land use expectations at different spatial and temporal scales. Second, a practical set of indicators was taken from 'Best Professional Judgment' and used to quantify the performance of the ecosystem services for these four farms. The indicators were derived from biotic and abiotic soil parameters. The performance of ecosystem services was related to a reference situation (MEP: maximum ecological potential) with the same land use and soil type combination (i.e., arable fields on silt loam) taken from the database of our national soil survey. In many cases, the performance of ecosystem services was relatively poor if compared to MEP. However, the performances of natural attenuation and/or climate-related services were better. In addition, the different management of these farms (i.e. conventional, intensive and organic farming) was reflected in the performance of the ecosystem services of their soils. Third, land management measures to improve the targeted ecosystem services were incorporated in the outlined method, but not worked out with illustrative field data in this study. Together with concordant data, we show opportunities for a quantification of ecosystem services to improve land-users' awareness and to assess management sustainability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis
Duraiappah, A. K., Naeem, S., WRI, & Millennium Ecosystems Assessment Board (2005) · Cited by 2,836
Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies
Power, A. G. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0143 · Cited by 2,334
A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils
Dominati, E., Patterson, M., & Mackay, A. D. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002 · Cited by 1,170
Bishop, J., ten Brink, P., Gundimeda, H., Kumar, P., Neßhöver, C., Schröter‐Schlaack, C., Simmons, B., Sukhdev, P., & Wittmer, H. (2010) · Cited by 971
Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years
Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P. C., Steuer, R. E., Wallenius, J., & Zionts, S. (1992) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.38.5.645 · Cited by 621
Quantifying the Contribution of Organisms to the Provision of Ecosystem Services
Luck, G., Harrington, R., Harrison, P. A., Kremen, C., Berry, P. M., Bugter, R. J. F., Dawson, T. P., de Bello, F., Díaz, S. M., Feld, C. K., et al. (2009) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.3.7 · Cited by 403
Microbiological methods for assessing soil quality
Bloem, J., HOPKINS, D. W., & Benedetti, A. (2005) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851990989.0000 · Cited by 309
The use of microorganisms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts
Winding, A., Hund‐Rinke, K., & Rutgers, M. (2005) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.026 · Cited by 264
Self-citationHaygarth, P. M., & Ritz, K. (2009) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.016 · Cited by 237
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Boyd, 2007, The endpoint problem, Resources, 165, 26
- Didden, 2003, Development and potential of a stereotype as a references site in ecological monitoring, Newsl Enchytraeidae, 8, 33
- European Commission, 2000, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy, Off J Eur Communities, L327
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960
Self-citationSoil “ecosystem” services and natural capital: critical appraisal of research on uncertain ground
Baveye, P. C., Baveye, J., & Gowdy, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2016.00041 · Cited by 446
Morel, J., Chenu, C., & Lorenz, K. E. (2014) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-014-0926-0 · Cited by 433
Pulleman, M., Creamer, R., Hamer, U., Helder, J., Pelosi, C., Pérès, G., & Rutgers, M. (2012) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.009 · Cited by 327
Self-citationAgroforestry boosts soil health in the humid and sub-humid tropics: A meta-analysis
Muchane, M. N., Sileshi, G. W., Gripenberg, S., Jonsson, M., Pumariño, L., & Barrios, E. (2020) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.106899 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutgers, M., van Wijnen, H. J., Schouten, A. J., Mulder, C., Kuiten, A. M. P., Brussaard, L., & Breure, A. M.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Rutgers, M.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 415
- Pages
- 39-48
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990211075
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Ministry of Environment
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Keywords
- ecosystem services, soil properties, arable farms, ecosystem service indicators, sustainable land management, stakeholder analysis, natural attenuation, organic farming, conventional farming, intensive agriculture, soil survey, Hoeksche Waard
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Monitoring, Netherlands, Soil, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
