Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors associated with second-hand smoke exposure in non-smoking pregnant women in Spain: Self-reported exposure and urinary cotinine levels

Aurrekoetxea, Juan J., Murcia, Mario, Rebagliato, Marisa, Fernández-Somoano, Ana, Castilla, Ane Miren, Guxens, Mònica, López, María José, Lertxundi, Aitana, Espada, Mercedes, Tardón, Adonina, Ballester, Ferran, Santa-Marina, Loreto·2014·Science of The Total Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.110
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.110

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Ashford, 2010, Measuring prenatal secondhand smoke exposure in mother–baby couplets, Nicotine Tob Res, 12, 127, 10.1093/ntr/ntp185 · DOI
  2. Aurrekoetxea, 2013, Determinants of self-reported smoking and misclassification during pregnancy, and analysis of optimal cut-off points of urinary cotinine: a cross sectional study, Br Med J Open, 24, 3(1)
  3. Becher, 1992, Passive smoking in Germany and Poland: comparison of exposure levels, sources of exposure, validity, and perception, Epidemiology, 3, 509, 10.1097/00001648-199211000-00008 · DOI
  4. Benowitz, 1996, Cotinine as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure, Epidemiol Rev, 18, 188, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017925 · DOI
  5. Benowitz, 2009, Urine nicotine metabolite concentrations in relation to plasma cotinine during low-level nicotine exposure, Nicotine Tob Res, 11, 954, 10.1093/ntr/ntp092 · DOI
  6. Caixeta, 2012, Current tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure among women of reproductive age — 14 countries, 2008–2010, MMWR, 61, 877
  7. Chiu, 2008, The relationship between self-reported tobacco exposure and cotinines in urine and blood for pregnant women, Sci Total Environ, 406, 331, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.005 · DOI
  8. De Chazeron, 2007, Occult maternal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke exposure, Tob Control, 16, 64, 10.1136/tc.2006.018291 · DOI
  9. Dempsey, 2002, Accelerated metabolism of nicotine and cotinine in pregnant smokers, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 301, 594, 10.1124/jpet.301.2.594 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Domingo-Salvany, 2000, Proposal for a social class measure. Working Group of the Spanish Society of Epidemiology and the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine, Aten Primaria, 25, 350
  11. Eiden, 2011, Sources and frequency of secondhand smoke exposure during pregnancy, Nicotine Tob Res, 13, 653, 10.1093/ntr/ntr053 · DOI
  12. England, 2007, Misclassification of maternal smoking status and its effects on an epidemiologic study of pregnancy outcomes, Nicotine Tob Res, 9, 1005, 10.1080/14622200701491255 · DOI
  13. Guxens, 2012, Cohort Profile: The INMA—INfancia y Medio Ambiente—(Environment and Childhood) Project, Int J Epidemiol, 41, 930, 10.1093/ije/dyr054 · DOI
  14. Iñiguez, 2012, Active and passive smoking during pregnancy and ultrasound measures of fetal growth in a cohort of pregnant women, J Epidemiol Community Health, 66, 563, 10.1136/jech.2010.116756 · DOI
  15. Jhun, 2010, Self-reported smoking and urinary cotinine levels among pregnant women in Korea and factors associated with smoking during pregnancy, J Korean Med Sci, 25, 752, 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.5.752 · DOI
  16. Kvalvik, 2012, Self-reported smoking status and plasma cotinine concentrations among pregnant women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study, Pediatr Res, 72, 101, 10.1038/pr.2012.36 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Paek, 2009, Self-reported exposure to secondhand smoke and positive urinary cotinine in pregnant nonsmokers, Yonsei Med J, 50, 345, 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.3.345 · DOI
  18. Rebagliato, 1995, Assessment of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in nonsmoking pregnant women in different environments of daily living, Am J Epidemiol, 142, 525, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117670 · DOI
  19. Rebagliato, 1998, Variations in cotinine levels in smokers during and after pregnancy, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 178, 568, 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70440-5 · DOI
  20. Regidor, 2008, Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care, BMC Health Serv Res, 14, 8
  21. Salmasi, 2010, Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 89, 423, 10.3109/00016340903505748 · DOI
  22. Sasaki, 2011, Self-reported tobacco smoke exposure and plasma cotinine levels during pregnancy — a validation study in Northern Japan, Sci Total Environ, 412–413, 114, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.019 · DOI
  23. Spierto, 1994, Urinary cotinine levels in women enrolled in a smoking cessation study during and after pregnancy, J Smoking Relat Dis, 5, 65
  24. St Helen, 2012, Exposure to secondhand smoke outside of a bar and a restaurant and tobacco exposure biomarkers in nonsmokers, Environ Health Perspect, 120, 1010, 10.1289/ehp.1104413 · DOI
  25. Strandhagen, 2010, Selection bias in a population survey with registry linkage: potential effect on socioeconomic gradient in cardiovascular risk, Eur J Epidemiol, 25, 163, 10.1007/s10654-010-9427-7 · DOI
  26. Vardavas, 2010, Factors associated with active smoking, quitting, and secondhand smoke exposure among pregnant women in Greece, J Epidemiol, 20, 355, 10.2188/jea.JE20090156 · DOI
  27. Vardavas, 2013, Exposure to different sources of second-hand smoke during pregnancy and its effect on urinary cotinine and tobacco-specific nitrosamine (NNAL) concentrations, Tob Control, 22, 194, 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050144 · DOI
  28. Wilson, 2011, Tobacco-smoke exposure in children who live in multiunit housing, Pediatrics, 127, 85, 10.1542/peds.2010-2046 · DOI
  29. Woodward, 1999, Measures of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 895, 156, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08083.x · DOI
  30. Yoo, 2010, Hair nicotine levels in non-smoking pregnant women whose spouses smoke outside of the home, Tob Control, 19, 318, 10.1136/tc.2009.033134 · DOI

Cited by

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Aurrekoetxea, J. J., Murcia, M., Rebagliato, M., Fernández-Somoano, A., Castilla, A. M., Guxens, M., López, M. J., Lertxundi, A., Espada, M., Tardón, A., Ballester, F., & Santa-Marina, L.
ORCID
Fernández-Somoano, Ana
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
470-471
Pages
1189-1196
ISSN
0048-9697
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.110
Cited by
36
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.