The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES
Folke, C. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 · Cited by 7,749
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1
Rogers, R. W. (1975) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 · Cited by 6,805
At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P. M., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. J. (1994) · Cited by 6,286
Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards*
Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1540-6237.8402002 · Cited by 5,702
Adger, W. N. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 · Cited by 5,417
Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability
Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 · Cited by 5,282
Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03610-150420 · Cited by 4,764
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x · Cited by 3,885
Cited by
Climate Change and Its Impact on the Yield of Major Food Crops: Evidence from Pakistan
Ali, S., Liu, Y., Ishaq, M., Shah, T., Abdullah, Ilyas, A., & Din, I. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6060039 · Cited by 528
The Impact of Perceived Flood Exposure on Flood‐Risk Perception: The Role of Distance
O'Neill, E., Brereton, F., Shahumyan, H., & Clinch, J. P. (2016) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12597 · Cited by 204
Disaster Risk Perception of University Students
Mızrak, S., & Aslan, R. (2020) · Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy · doi:10.1002/rhc3.12202 · Cited by 60
Bhuyan, M. J., Deka, N., & Saikia, A. (2024) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.14191 · Cited by 41
Teicher, H. M. (2018) · Urban Climate · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2018.04.008 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Birkholz, S., Muro, M., Jeffrey, P., & Smith, H. M.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 478
- Pages
- 12-20
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010886942
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061
- The paper
- Birkholz, S., Muro, M., Jeffrey, P., & Smith, H. M. (2014). Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
