Carbon sequestration by Miscanthus energy crops plantations in a broad range semi-arid marginal land in China
Abstract
Carbon sequestration is an essential ecosystem service that second-generation energy crops can provide. To evaluate the ability of carbon sequestration of Miscanthus energy crops in the Loess Plateau of China, the yield and soil organic carbon (SOC) changes were measured for three Miscanthus species in the experimental field in Qingyang of the Gansu Province (QG). With the highest yield of the three species, Miscanthus lutarioriparius contributed to the largest increase of SOC, 0.57 t ha(-1)yr(-1), comparing to the field left unplanted. Through modeling M. lutarioriparius yield across the Loess Plateau, an average increase of SOC was estimated at 0.46 t ha(-1)yr(-1) for the entire region. Based on the measurements of SOC mineralization under various temperatures and moistures for soil samples taken from QG, a model was developed for estimating SOC mineralization rates across the Loess Plateau and resulted in an average of 1.11 t ha(-1)yr(-1). Combining the estimates from these models, the average of net carbon sequestration was calculated at a rate of 9.13 t ha(-1)yr(-1) in the Loess Plateau. These results suggested that the domestication and production of M. lutarioriparius hold a great potential for carbon sequestration and soil restoration in this heavily eroded region.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602 · see citing works
Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, <i>Miscanthus</i>
CLIFTON‐BROWN, J. C., BREUER, J., & JONES, M. B. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01438.x · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Carbon sequestration in soil beneath long-term Miscanthus plantations as determined by abundance
Hansen, E. M., Christensen, B. T., Jensen, L. S., & Kristensen, K. (2004) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(03)00102-8 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Miscanthus biomass productivity within US croplands and its potential impact on soil organic carbon
Mishra, U., Torn, M. S., & Fingerman, K. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01201.x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Liu, W., Yan, J., Li, J., & Sang, T. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01157.x · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment of the production potentials of Miscanthus on marginal land in China
Xue, S., Lewandowski, I., Wang, X., & Yi, Z. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.040 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Liu, T., Huffman, T., Kulshreshtha, S., McConkey, B., Du, Y., Green, M., Liu, J., Shang, J., & Geng, X. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.126 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Xu, Y., Zhou, J., Feng, W., Jia, R., Liu, C., Fu, T., Xue, S., Yi, Z., Guillaume, T., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12990 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“…C after perennial energy crops cultivation have not separated SOC into new and old pools, which may cause a vague estimation of the effects of land use on soil C dynamics as the old pools to have a much longer mean residence time (MRT) than labile pools (Novara et al., 2013; Zang et al., 2018).”
Background
- Authors
- Mi, J., Liu, W., Yang, W., Yan, J., Li, J., & Sang, T.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Sang, Tao
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 496
- Pages
- 373-380
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023957861
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institute of Botany, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91131902)
- Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-EX-QR-1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- carbon sequestration, Miscanthus, Miscanthus lutarioriparius, energy crops, soil organic carbon, soil organic carbon mineralization, biomass yield, Loess Plateau, soil restoration, soil erosion
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Carbon, China, Poaceae, Soil, Ecosystem, Crops, Agricultural, Carbon Sequestration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review