Cited by 43Bioenergy crop production and managementSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Carbon sequestration by Miscanthus energy crops plantations in a broad range semi-arid marginal land in China

Mi, Jia, Liu, Wei, Yang, Wenhui, Yan, Juan, Li, Jianqiang, Sang, Tao·2014·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Carbon sequestration is an essential ecosystem service that second-generation energy crops can provide. To evaluate the ability of carbon sequestration of Miscanthus energy crops in the Loess Plateau of China, the yield and soil organic carbon (SOC) changes were measured for three Miscanthus species in the experimental field in Qingyang of the Gansu Province (QG). With the highest yield of the three species, Miscanthus lutarioriparius contributed to the largest increase of SOC, 0.57 t ha(-1)yr(-1), comparing to the field left unplanted. Through modeling M. lutarioriparius yield across the Loess Plateau, an average increase of SOC was estimated at 0.46 t ha(-1)yr(-1) for the entire region. Based on the measurements of SOC mineralization under various temperatures and moistures for soil samples taken from QG, a model was developed for estimating SOC mineralization rates across the Loess Plateau and resulted in an average of 1.11 t ha(-1)yr(-1). Combining the estimates from these models, the average of net carbon sequestration was calculated at a rate of 9.13 t ha(-1)yr(-1) in the Loess Plateau. These results suggested that the domestication and production of M. lutarioriparius hold a great potential for carbon sequestration and soil restoration in this heavily eroded region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.047

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mi, J., Liu, W., Yang, W., Yan, J., Li, J., & Sang, T.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Sang, Tao
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
496
Pages
373-380
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023957861
Cited by
43
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institute of Botany, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91131902)
  • Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-EX-QR-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
carbon sequestration, Miscanthus, Miscanthus lutarioriparius, energy crops, soil organic carbon, soil organic carbon mineralization, biomass yield, Loess Plateau, soil restoration, soil erosion
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Carbon, China, Poaceae, Soil, Ecosystem, Crops, Agricultural, Carbon Sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review