Cited by 62Bioenergy crop production and managementEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityBiofuel production and bioconversion

Environmental life cycle assessment of producing willow, alfalfa and straw from spring barley as feedstocks for bioenergy or biorefinery systems

Open access
Parajuli, Ranjan, Knudsen, Marie Trydeman, Djomo, Sylvestre Njakou, Corona, Andrea, Birkved, Morten, Dalgaard, Tommy·2017·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The current study aimed at evaluating potential environmental impacts for the production of willow, alfalfa and straw from spring barley as feedstocks for bioenergy or biorefinery systems. A method of Life Cycle Assessment was used to evaluate based on the following impact categories: Global Warming Potential (GWP 100), Eutrophication Potential (EP), Non-Renewable Energy (NRE) use, Agricultural Land Occupation (ALO), Potential Freshwater Ecotoxicity (PFWTox) and Soil quality. With regard to the methods, soil organic carbon (SOC) change related to the land occupation was calculated based on the net carbon input to the soil. Freshwater ecotoxicity was calculated using the comparative toxicity units of the active ingredients and their average emission distribution fractions to air and freshwater. Soil quality was based on the change in the SOC stock estimated during the land use transformation and land occupation. Environmental impacts for straw were economically allocated from the impacts obtained for spring barley. The results obtained per ton dry matter showed a lower carbon footprint for willow and alfalfa compared to straw. It was due to higher soil carbon sequestration and lower N 2 O emissions. Likewise, willow and alfalfa had lower EP than straw. Straw had lowest NRE use compared to other biomasses. PFWTox was lower in willow and alfalfa compared to straw. A critical negative effect on soil quality was found with the spring barley production and hence for straw. Based on the energy output to input ratio, willow performed better than other biomasses. On the basis of carbohydrate content of straw, the equivalent dry matter of alfalfa and willow would be requiring higher. The environmental impacts of the selected biomasses in biorefinery therefore would differ based on the conversion efficiency, e.g. of the carbohydrates in the related biorefinery processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.207

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cultivating willow and alfalfa as feedstocks for bioenergy can potentially sequestrate more soil organic carbon and thus lead to a lower carbon footprint.

    “cultivating willow and alfalfa as feedstocks for bioenergy can potentially sequestrate more soil organic carbon and thus lead to a lower carbon footprint.”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Parajuli et al. (2017)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 92 · Cited by 62

Authors
Parajuli, R., Knudsen, M. T., Djomo, S. N., Corona, A., Birkved, M., & Dalgaard, T.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Parajuli, Ranjan
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
586
Pages
226-240
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2586412605
Cited by
62
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3
FWCI
16.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
The Danish Council for Strategic Research and The Danish Council for Technology and Innovation (0603-00522B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
willow, alfalfa, biomass feedstock, biorefinery, environmental impact, carbon footprint, soil organic carbon sequestration, nitrous oxide emissions, eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, soil quality, land occupation, energy return ratio, carbohydrate content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review