The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
National scale evaluation of the InVEST nutrient retention model in the United Kingdom
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x · Cited by 7,945
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K. M., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., et al. (2009) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/080023 · Cited by 2,389 · cited 1×
“InVEST is widely used for modelling multiple ecosystem services and considering trade-offs (e.g. Bai et al. 2013; Leh et al. 2013; Nelson et al. 2009; Sánchez-Canales et al. 2012; Sharps et al. 2017) and is free and open-107 source.”
MethodAn ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development
Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & Chang, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705797105 · Cited by 753
Cited by
Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people
Chaplin-Kramer, R., Sharp, R. P., Weil, C., Bennett, E. M., Pascual, U., Arkema, K. K., Brauman, K. A., Bryant, B. P., Guerry, A. D., Haddad, N. M., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw3372 · Cited by 454
Self-citationGlobal trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050
Pereira, H. M., Martins, I. S., Rosa, I. M. D., Kim, H., Leadley, P., Popp, A., van Vuuren, D. P., Hurtt, G., Quoss, L., Arneth, A., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adn3441 · Cited by 308
Self-citationCong, W., Sun, X., Guo, H., & Shan, R. (2020) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106089 · Cited by 266
Alshehri, K., Harbottle, M., Sapsford, D., Beames, A., & Cleall, P. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137352 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Redhead, J. W., May, L., Oliver, T. H., Hamel, P., Sharp, R., & Bullock, J. M.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 610-611
- Pages
- 666-677
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2746512971
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National scale evaluation of the InVEST nutrient retention model in the United Kingdom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.092
- The paper
- Redhead, J. W., May, L., Oliver, T. H., Hamel, P., Sharp, R., & Bullock, J. M. (2018). National scale evaluation of the InVEST nutrient retention model in the United Kingdom. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
