Cited by 454Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people

Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca, Sharp, Richard P., Weil, Charlotte, Bennett, Elena M., Pascual, Unai, Arkema, Katie K., Brauman, Kate A., Bryant, Benjamin P. +13 more·2019·Science

Abstract

The future of nature's contributions: A recent Global Assessment by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services has emphasized the urgent need to determine where and how nature's contribution matters most to people. Chaplin-Kramer et al. have developed a globalscale modeling of ecosystem services, focusing on water quality regulation, coastal protection, and crop pollination (see the Perspective by Balvanera). By 2050, up to 5 billion people may be at risk from diminishing ecosystem services, particularly in Africa and South Asia. Science , this issue p. 255 ; see also p. 184

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaw3372

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent modeling of natural regulation of water quality, reduction of coastal risk, and crop pollination worldwide found convergent conclusions.

    “Recent modeling of natural regulation of water quality, reduction of coastal risk, and crop pollination worldwide ( 84 ) found convergent conclusions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaplin-Kramer, R., Sharp, R. P., Weil, C., Bennett, E. M., Pascual, U., Arkema, K. K., Brauman, K. A., Bryant, B. P., Guerry, A. D., Haddad, N. M., Hamann, M., Hamel, P., Johnson, J. A., Mandle, L., Pereira, H. M., Polasky, S., Ruckelshaus, M., Shaw, M. R., Silver, J. M., Vogl, A. L., & Daily, G. C.
Affiliations
  • Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Stanford University (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Ikerbasque (ES)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Kellogg Biological Station, Department of Integrative Biology, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA.
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • World Wildlife Fund (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2019-10-11
Volume
366
Issue
6462
Pages
255-258
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2980239312
Cited by
454
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 7
FWCI
24.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation
  • German Research Foundation (FZT 118)
  • Peter and Helen Bing
  • Roger and Vicki Sant
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
nature's contributions to people, global change, water quality regulation, water pollution, coastal risk reduction, crop pollination, pollinator decline, land use change, climate change scenarios, sustainable development, food security, ecosystem services
MeSH terms
Africa, Americas, Asia, Conservation of Natural Resources, Developing Countries, Environment, Europe, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Water Pollution, Ecosystem, Crops, Agricultural, Nature, Pollination, Climate Change, Water Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review